Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Of the ten experimental units observed, only five were <br />randomized. The first two cases were deliberately seeded to <br />shakedown the procedures while seeding was known to be <br />occurring. The January 21, March 18, and March 19. cases <br />were conducted under suspension so no seeding was pos- <br />sible. <br /> <br />MEASUREMENTS <br /> <br />Seeding effects were measured with three basic systems: <br />1) a microphysics aircraft, 2) radar, and 3) precipitation <br />instrumentation at the ground. Sufficient observations were <br />not obtained during 1981-82 to permit conclusive state- <br />ments about seeding effects. Two to four years are required <br />to obtain enough cases to detect the seeding signal above <br />the natural variability. The purpose of the 1981-82 season <br />was to shakedown the field and analysis procedures. <br />Although the quality of observations from prior calibra- <br />tion years is less than that in 1981-82, inclusion of that <br />data allows some comparison of seeded and non-seeded <br />cases. <br /> <br />Microphysics Aircraft <br /> <br />The microphysics aircraft observed many variables as it <br />penetrated seeded and non-seeded clouds, (1. D. Marwitz <br />and R. E. Stewart, 1981). Figure la and Ib show the <br />average change in time of one of the primary response <br />variables measured. by the aircraft. Figure la shows the <br />average ice crystal concentration measured with a Particle <br />Measuring System 2D-C optical imaging probe in four <br />seeded and 16 non-seeded A-type cells. <br />It is evident that the seeded cells had considerably more <br />ice crystals than the non-seeded cells. In fact, after the first <br />few minutes the seeded cells exceeded the non-seeded cells <br />by over an order of magnitude. Figure 1 b shows the same <br />variable as Figure la but for C-type clouds. In this case the <br />non-seeded cells show more ice crystals than the seeded <br />cells. <br /> <br />Radar Analysis <br /> <br />The radar analysis for the 1981-82 season has not been <br />completed as of this paper. However, one of the main <br />analysis procedures, shown in Figure 2, is the percent <br />coverage of radar reflectivity within boxes downwind of <br />the seeding line (A. W. Huggins, 1981). Figure 2 shows <br />boxes centered at 30 and 60 minutes after seeding for the <br />14 February 1979 case. The boxes are moved downwind at <br />the speed of the cell motion and the sides of the boxes <br />diverge to allow for dispersion of seeding material laterally . <br />The coverage greater than 20 decibels of radar reflectivity <br />(DBZ) at 30 and 60 minutes after seeding is 23.3 percent <br />and 57.3 percent, respectively. Similar boxes are evaluated <br />each 30 minutes after seeding and averaged together over <br />the experimental unit. Percentage coverage greater than a <br /> <br />Vardiman <br /> <br />,....:::-~~. .t <br /> <br />fixed DBZ level is expected to be greater for seeded cases <br />than for non-seeded cases. <br /> <br /> 150 <br />~ (a) <br />... <br />~ <br />..J <br />....... <br /># <br /> 100 <br /> <br />c: <br />.2 <br />.. <br />~ <br />.. <br />c: <br />III <br /><.J <br />c: <br /><3 50 <br /> <br />E <br />en <br />>- <br />... <br />(.) <br />III <br />..!:! <br /> <br />--~ <br />-- ....... <br />~---- .............. <br />/ ........ <br />/ <br />/ <br />o ./ <br />o <br /> <br />20 <br /> <br />........ <br />......... <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />, <br />5 10 15 <br />Time after initial pass (min.) <br /> <br /> 150 <br />~ (b) <br />j! <br />..J <br />....... <br /># <br /> 100 ~ <br />c: /' <br />.2 "..- <br />.. "..- <br />~ ,/ <br />.. <br />c: ,/ <br />III "..- <br /><.J .A" <br />c: <br />0 50 <br />(.) /' <br /> /' <br />0 ............-..........- <br />-:;; <br />>- <br />U <br />III <br />..!:! 0 <br /> 0 5 10 15 20 <br /> Time after initial pass (min.) <br /> <br /> <br />Figure 1. Average Ice Crystal Concentration Versus Time. <br />(a) A-type cells. (b) C-type cells. <br /> <br />Precipitation Instrumentation <br /> <br />Gages - A network of approximately 40 Belfort weigh- <br />ing bucket rain gages was distributed over the American and <br />Truckee- Tahoe River Basins. These gages were organized <br />in 20 kIn wide regions parallel to the crest. By overlaying <br />the expected seeding plume for each case over the gage <br />regions, the contribution of seeding by elevation zone may <br />be estimated. The average intensity and probability of <br />exceeding fixed precipitation rates were calculated for each <br />region within the seeding plume (Solak, et. al., 1981). <br />Table 2 shows the average intensity and precipitation <br />probability for the region 20-40 km upwind of the crest for <br />the 10 cases observed in 1981-82. Although the average <br />intensity is greater for the seeded cases than for the non- <br />seeded cases, the average probability of exceeding 0 mm/hr <br />is less. The random noise for such a small sample is too great <br /> <br />420 <br />