Laserfiche WebLink
<br />.13 <br /> <br />4.0 INTENSIVE CASE STUDIES <br /> <br />." <br /> <br />4.1 9 March 1977 CASE STUDY <br /> <br />? <br />.. <br /> <br />The 9 March storm was one of the few significant storms that <br /> <br />occurred in the drought-stricken winter of 1976-77 in California. A <br /> <br />deepening middle-level trough formed along the West Coast in response <br /> <br />to strong cold advection to its rear. Pre-frontal precipitation was <br /> <br />falling over the mountains from a fairly warm (-10 to -15oC) orographic <br /> <br />cloud at 0945 GMT. The main part of the storm swept through southern <br /> <br />Oregon. As a result, no extensive high cloud covered the frontal band <br /> <br />in the target area. <br /> <br />Decreasing CTT preceded the surface cold front as the frontal cloud <br /> <br />band entered the target (Figure 2). Coldest cloud tops over the target <br /> <br />t4\ <br /> <br />were at 1445 just before the front, where mean CTT in the target was <br /> <br />".. <br /> <br />o 0 <br />-33 C and the coldest cloud element seen in the target was -38 C. Radar <br /> <br />observed cloud tops agreed fairly well with the satellite cloud tops.l <br /> <br />o <br />The radar top of -41 C at 1530 GMT was not verified by the satellite <br /> <br />(Figure 2), due to the lower resolution of the satellite IR sensor <br /> <br />averaging out this small perturbation. <br /> <br />Precipitation began increasing sharply around 1345 at Plavapa to <br /> <br />a maximum of 9 rom per hour with the frontal passage (Figure 3). No <br /> <br />rain fell at Auburn in the Central Valley until the frontal band passed <br /> <br />over. Precipitation rates at all stations shown in Figs. 3 and 4 are <br /> <br />closely related to the decreasing target area CTT. In a storm such as <br /> <br />this one, the above result is to be expected. The decreasing CTT is <br /> <br /><# <br /> <br />; <br /> <br />1 Using the Sheridan sounding the satellite cloud-top temperatures <br />could be converted to km above mean-sea level and the radar heights <br />could be converted to temperature for comparisons. <br />