Laserfiche WebLink
<br />DECEMBER 1981 <br /> <br />SILVERMAN, ROGERS AND DAHL <br /> <br />1477 <br /> <br />tation experiment. The network sampling variance <br />component is responsible for < 10% of the total sam- <br />ple size requirement with a gage density of at least <br />two per rain cell (an average of four per storm) and <br />< 27% with a gage density of only one per raincell <br />(an average of two per storm). Based on the observed <br />raincell areas and their contribution to the storm's <br />total rainfall, this corresponds to moderately dense <br />raingage networks of 45-80 km2 per gage and 90- <br />160 km2 per gage, respectively. In view of the large <br />natural variability, there does not appear to be any <br />advantage in using higher density gage networks. <br />The main thrust should, for the present, be in the <br />direction of reducing the natural variability by phys- <br />ically meaningful stratifications according to predic- <br />tor variables and covariates. ,It, however, should be <br />noted that as the efforts to reduce the natural vari- <br />ability succeed, the importance of network sampling <br />variance will increase and higher density gage net- <br />works will be required to attain reasonable sample <br />sizes in precipitation augmentation experiments. <br />These results are consistent with the conclusions <br />of Heimbach and Super (1980) and Olsen and <br />Woodley (1955) who also assessed the effect of rain- <br />gage density on the evaluation of simulated precip- <br />itation enhancement experiments and found that nat- <br />ural rain variability is the major obstacle in the <br />determination of a seeding effect. They too stressed <br />the need for developing covariates and/or predictor <br />variables to effectively deal with the rain variability <br />issue. <br />The large natural variability in convective storm <br />precipitation volume and the resulting large sample <br />size requirements to evaluate precipitation augmen- <br />tation experiments led Huff (1968b) to suggest an <br />evaluation approach that is based on detecting <br />changes in the spatial distribution of precipitation <br />as given by its area-depth relationship. Implicit in <br />this suggestion, assuming that seeding does, in fact, <br />cause such changes, is that gage networks of suffi- <br />cient density to define the area-depth curves of the <br />experimental storms accurately are used in the pre- <br />cipitation augmentation experiments. Also implicit <br />in this suggestion is the assumption that the char- <br />acteristic parameters of the area-depth curves exhibit <br />less natural variability with respect to the magnitude <br />of the changes due to seeding than does mean pre- <br />cipitation. Eddy (1976) has shown that considerably <br />higher gage densities are needed to define the struc- <br />ture of an isohyetal pattern with reasonable accuracy <br />than are needed to determine total storm precipita- <br />tion volume. Huffs suggestion is, nevertheless, in- <br />triguing and, since the overall cost of an experiment <br />is affected more by the number of seasons it must <br />run than the number of precipitation gages it em- <br />ploys, it would be worthwhile to pursue his suggestion <br />further by examining the statistical properties of <br />area-depth curve parameters. <br /> <br />i <br /> <br />TABLE 5, Percentage contribution of total sample size to detect <br />a 25% cha.nge in mean Montana storm precipitation due to sam- <br />pling variance as a function of gage density (based on both the <br />median art:a of all rain cells A I, and the median area of the primary <br />raincells ,<(2)' <br /> <br /> Gage density <br /> (km2 fgage) Percentage contribution <br /> by network sampling <br />GPR Al A2 variance <br />100 0,9 1.6 0,05 <br />50 1.8 3,2 0,05 <br />10 9,0 16,0 0,5 <br />5 18,0 32,0 1.9 <br />2 45,0 80,0 9,9 <br />I 90,0 160,0 26,9 <br />0,5 180,0 320,0 50,7 <br /> <br />An examination of Table 5 reveals other possibil- <br />ities. Since the values of the coefficient of variation <br />(log-normal standard deviation for log-normally dis- <br />tributed variables) for storm area and storm duration <br />are considerably less than that for storm rainfall vol- <br />ume, a smaller sample size will be required to detect <br />an equivalent or even smaller seeding effect if the <br />evaluation of the experiment were based on these <br />rain characteristics. Ackerman et al. (1976)6 ob- <br />tained similar results from an investigation of sample <br />size requirements for various rain parameters of <br />METROMEX raincells. Increases in the values of <br />both parameters have been postulated as a result of <br />seeding for dynamic effects (Simpson, 1980) which <br />is thought to induce the merger of neighboring <br />storms and/or sustain the propagation of the storm <br />by encouraging the development of additional rain- <br />cells. <br /> <br />8. Summary <br /> <br />Estimates of precipitation volume from preCIpI- <br />tation gage networks are subject to a component of <br />variability that is caused by the random direction of <br />movement and orientation of the storm and the vari- <br />ations in storm structure. A computer model of rain- <br />cell isohyetal patterns has been used to assess quan- <br />titatively the sampling variance of gage networks. <br />We have shown that the coefficient of variation in- <br />creases with decreasing gage density and increasing <br />precipitation gradient. Contrary to the sampling er- <br />ror studies of other investigators, it was found that <br />the mean precipitation remained unbiased as the <br />gage density decreased but its standard deviation in- <br />creased. <br /> <br />6 Ackerman, 8., G, L. Achtemeier, H, Appleman, S,A. Chang- <br />non, F. A., Huff, G, M, Morgan, P. T, Schickedanz, and R, G, <br />Semonin, 1976: Design of the High Plains Experiment with specific <br />focus on Phase 2, single cloud experimentation, Illinois State <br />Water Survey Final Report, Contract 14-06-D-7197 Div, of At- <br />mos, Water Resour, Management, Bureau of Reclamation, 231 <br />pp. <br />