|
<br />DECEMBER 1981
<br />
<br />SILVERMAN, ROGERS AND DAHL
<br />
<br />1477
<br />
<br />tation experiment. The network sampling variance
<br />component is responsible for < 10% of the total sam-
<br />ple size requirement with a gage density of at least
<br />two per rain cell (an average of four per storm) and
<br />< 27% with a gage density of only one per raincell
<br />(an average of two per storm). Based on the observed
<br />raincell areas and their contribution to the storm's
<br />total rainfall, this corresponds to moderately dense
<br />raingage networks of 45-80 km2 per gage and 90-
<br />160 km2 per gage, respectively. In view of the large
<br />natural variability, there does not appear to be any
<br />advantage in using higher density gage networks.
<br />The main thrust should, for the present, be in the
<br />direction of reducing the natural variability by phys-
<br />ically meaningful stratifications according to predic-
<br />tor variables and covariates. ,It, however, should be
<br />noted that as the efforts to reduce the natural vari-
<br />ability succeed, the importance of network sampling
<br />variance will increase and higher density gage net-
<br />works will be required to attain reasonable sample
<br />sizes in precipitation augmentation experiments.
<br />These results are consistent with the conclusions
<br />of Heimbach and Super (1980) and Olsen and
<br />Woodley (1955) who also assessed the effect of rain-
<br />gage density on the evaluation of simulated precip-
<br />itation enhancement experiments and found that nat-
<br />ural rain variability is the major obstacle in the
<br />determination of a seeding effect. They too stressed
<br />the need for developing covariates and/or predictor
<br />variables to effectively deal with the rain variability
<br />issue.
<br />The large natural variability in convective storm
<br />precipitation volume and the resulting large sample
<br />size requirements to evaluate precipitation augmen-
<br />tation experiments led Huff (1968b) to suggest an
<br />evaluation approach that is based on detecting
<br />changes in the spatial distribution of precipitation
<br />as given by its area-depth relationship. Implicit in
<br />this suggestion, assuming that seeding does, in fact,
<br />cause such changes, is that gage networks of suffi-
<br />cient density to define the area-depth curves of the
<br />experimental storms accurately are used in the pre-
<br />cipitation augmentation experiments. Also implicit
<br />in this suggestion is the assumption that the char-
<br />acteristic parameters of the area-depth curves exhibit
<br />less natural variability with respect to the magnitude
<br />of the changes due to seeding than does mean pre-
<br />cipitation. Eddy (1976) has shown that considerably
<br />higher gage densities are needed to define the struc-
<br />ture of an isohyetal pattern with reasonable accuracy
<br />than are needed to determine total storm precipita-
<br />tion volume. Huffs suggestion is, nevertheless, in-
<br />triguing and, since the overall cost of an experiment
<br />is affected more by the number of seasons it must
<br />run than the number of precipitation gages it em-
<br />ploys, it would be worthwhile to pursue his suggestion
<br />further by examining the statistical properties of
<br />area-depth curve parameters.
<br />
<br />i
<br />
<br />TABLE 5, Percentage contribution of total sample size to detect
<br />a 25% cha.nge in mean Montana storm precipitation due to sam-
<br />pling variance as a function of gage density (based on both the
<br />median art:a of all rain cells A I, and the median area of the primary
<br />raincells ,<(2)'
<br />
<br /> Gage density
<br /> (km2 fgage) Percentage contribution
<br /> by network sampling
<br />GPR Al A2 variance
<br />100 0,9 1.6 0,05
<br />50 1.8 3,2 0,05
<br />10 9,0 16,0 0,5
<br />5 18,0 32,0 1.9
<br />2 45,0 80,0 9,9
<br />I 90,0 160,0 26,9
<br />0,5 180,0 320,0 50,7
<br />
<br />An examination of Table 5 reveals other possibil-
<br />ities. Since the values of the coefficient of variation
<br />(log-normal standard deviation for log-normally dis-
<br />tributed variables) for storm area and storm duration
<br />are considerably less than that for storm rainfall vol-
<br />ume, a smaller sample size will be required to detect
<br />an equivalent or even smaller seeding effect if the
<br />evaluation of the experiment were based on these
<br />rain characteristics. Ackerman et al. (1976)6 ob-
<br />tained similar results from an investigation of sample
<br />size requirements for various rain parameters of
<br />METROMEX raincells. Increases in the values of
<br />both parameters have been postulated as a result of
<br />seeding for dynamic effects (Simpson, 1980) which
<br />is thought to induce the merger of neighboring
<br />storms and/or sustain the propagation of the storm
<br />by encouraging the development of additional rain-
<br />cells.
<br />
<br />8. Summary
<br />
<br />Estimates of precipitation volume from preCIpI-
<br />tation gage networks are subject to a component of
<br />variability that is caused by the random direction of
<br />movement and orientation of the storm and the vari-
<br />ations in storm structure. A computer model of rain-
<br />cell isohyetal patterns has been used to assess quan-
<br />titatively the sampling variance of gage networks.
<br />We have shown that the coefficient of variation in-
<br />creases with decreasing gage density and increasing
<br />precipitation gradient. Contrary to the sampling er-
<br />ror studies of other investigators, it was found that
<br />the mean precipitation remained unbiased as the
<br />gage density decreased but its standard deviation in-
<br />creased.
<br />
<br />6 Ackerman, 8., G, L. Achtemeier, H, Appleman, S,A. Chang-
<br />non, F. A., Huff, G, M, Morgan, P. T, Schickedanz, and R, G,
<br />Semonin, 1976: Design of the High Plains Experiment with specific
<br />focus on Phase 2, single cloud experimentation, Illinois State
<br />Water Survey Final Report, Contract 14-06-D-7197 Div, of At-
<br />mos, Water Resour, Management, Bureau of Reclamation, 231
<br />pp.
<br />
|