Laserfiche WebLink
<br />tried to obtain estimates of the average sampl ing error in determing areal <br />mean rainfall from precipitation gage measurements. The usual procedure is <br />to represent the sampl i ng error as the difference between the best est imate <br />of the true mean obtained from the maximum density of gages and sample means <br />calculated from successively reduced gage densities. Sampling errors calculatE!d <br />in this way are at best relative errors since the true mean is not known in <br />an absolute sense. The approa:ch used herein differs from those of previous <br />studies in that the isohyetal patterns of interest are not initially derived <br />from point measurements of pr,ecipitation but are theoretically generated by a <br />continuous spatial distribution function so that the true precipitation <br />characteristics are known quantities. <br /> <br />2. Approach <br /> <br />Storm characteristics such as type, structure, duration, and spel~d and <br />direction of movement affect the size, shape, and precipitation gradient of <br />the isohyetal pattern it produces. The distribution of surface rainfall will <br />vary greatly between storms of similar area and duration, particularly for <br />convective storms in which cells develop and coexist at various times and <br />locations during the storm's 'lifetime (Crane, 1979). The isohyetal pattern <br />of moving convective storms w'ill, therefore, frequently contain multiple <br />peaks and will rarely be regu'lar in shape. An example of a convE~ctive storm <br />isohyetal pattern is shown in Fig. 1. <br /> <br />The complexity and variability of convective storm isohyetal patterns make it <br />difficult to model the entire storm pattern in a general manner. However, we <br />can cons ider that the i sohyetal pattern of the storm is composed of smaller <br />isolated precipitation areas which are characterized by closed isohyets and <br /> <br />2 <br />