My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WMOD00541
CWCB
>
Weather Modification
>
DayForward
>
WMOD00541
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/28/2009 2:40:40 PM
Creation date
4/24/2008 2:54:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Weather Modification
Title
Adaptation of the Rhea Winter Orographic Precipitation Model to Morocco
Date
4/1/1989
Weather Modification - Doc Type
Report
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
64
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />but most are two-dimensional (2-D) (in the x-z plane) [e.g., Myers, <br />1962; Sarker, 1967; Willis, 1970; Fraser et a1., 1973; P100ster and <br />Fukuta, 1974; and Young, 1974]. The majority of the above mentioned 2-D <br />models are steady-state and are based on simple assumptions (adiabatic <br />flow, no friction, idealized sinusoidal mountains). Some exceptions to <br />the above simplified 2-D models (designed for a flow solution) are found <br />in Myers (1962) and Elliott (1969) who use a more realistic approach, <br />such as simulating a more realistic topography and using the mass <br />continuity, hydrostatic, and thermodynamic energy equations. <br />We mentioned that a few 3-D models have been developed. These <br />models certainly have the advantage of more realistic simulation of the <br />overall topographic effects on the flow, which the 2-D models do not <br />have. On the other hand, more computational time is required (10 to 100 <br />times more than that required by the 2-D models), which can constitute a <br />serious disadvantage. For example, the present version of the 2-D model <br />being used for this study requires only 30 seconds for one "wetn sound- <br />ing to be processed on an IBM-PC. <br />In these 2-D and 3-D models, treatment of atmospheric water <br />substances varies from the assumption that all water which condenses <br />precipitates (Myers, 1962; Sarker, 1967; Colton, 1975) to rather complex <br />cloud physics considerations for the amount of precipitation (Young, <br />1974; Nickerson et a1., 1976). With some exceptions, these models were <br />essentially developed to be used as aids to cloud physics or weather <br />modification research. <br />The model results have had limited comparisons with observations. <br />In a test over a winter season of the model by Myers (1962), the linear <br /> <br />6 <br /> <br />I <br />t <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />, <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.