Laserfiche WebLink
<br />DA V1D W. REYNOLDS AND ARUNAS P. KUCIAUSKAS <br /> <br />145 <br /> <br />:ISCPP 15MI7~TI.: .:..:. .:.. ~. .:.. <br />::~.:..:~. <br /> <br />24 2i 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 Om 2i m20 18 16 14 12 <br /> <br />FEBRUARY 1988 <br /> <br />.c.... <br />.. . :. '. n: t...J ......-:..: (: "".. ~...:. I. <br />. <br /> <br /> <br />FIG. 3. One km resolution visible satellite image from the GOES- <br />W satellite for 2131 UTC 7 February 1985. Enhanced infrared data <br />replaces the visible data for CTT's colder than - 30oC. Gray-scale <br />enhancement is shown at top of image. <br /> <br />This second overrunning period is followed by pas- <br />sage of a complex cold front consisting of an upper <br />cold surgeJhurnidity front and a surface front having <br />cold katafront characteristics in all but the lowest layers. <br />Ragette (1984) described a storm over central Europe <br />having very similar frontal characteristics and at- <br />tempted, through use of serial soundings, to derive ver- <br />tical motion fields associated with the frontal bound- <br />aries. This technique showed strong subsidence behind <br />the upper cold surge and above the surface cold front <br />down to about 3 km MSL, similar to what would be <br />inferred here from the rapid drying aloft shown in <br />Fig. 2a. <br />The radar PPI sequence shown in Fig. 5a illustrates <br />the passage of the cold-frontal rainband with a well- <br />defined back edge of echoing cloud approaching the <br />radar at 1730 in close proximity to the upper-level cold <br /> <br />9: <br /> <br />f <br /> <br />~ <br />& <br />t= <br />~ <br />R' <br /> <br />surge. By 1845 the back edge of this band was posi- <br />tioned near Kingvale. The vertical cross section shown <br />in Fig. 5b, corresponding to the short line segment <br />shown in Fig. 5a, depicts the main band of precipitation <br />as a stratiform echo with a well-defined back edge and <br />tops generally 5 to 6 km.Behind the band, widely scat- <br />tered echo tops were briefly seen to extend to only 3 <br />to 4 km. Figure 2b shows that SL W increased with the <br />band as strong vertical motions existed in the band's <br />leading edge much like Hobbs (1978) describes. The <br />SL W remained substantially above background levels <br />in the shallow convectively enhanced orographic cloud <br />remaining over the barrier until 2200, when rnixing of <br />the drier air aloft eroded the cloud into individual con- <br />vective elements. <br />The satellite sequence in Fig. 6 shows the relationship <br />between the CTT field and the position of the surface <br />cold front. These can be compared to Fig. 2 and Fig. <br />5. The enhanced infrared image taken at 1500 shows <br />the very cold CTT associated with the increased pre- <br />cipitation rate between 1300 and 1700 at Kingvale. By <br />1700 the higher clouds passed Kingvale, with precip- <br />itation decreasing slightly and SL W increasing slightly. <br />The back edge of the upper cloud can best be associated <br />with the upper-level jet which can, at times, be located <br />as much as 60 to 120 n mi into the clear region or <br />cyclonic shear side of the jet (Oliver et ai., 1964). Pre- <br />cipitation rates increased again as the main rainband <br />passed Kingvale between 1700 and 2000. The cold <br />front appeared to lose speed from crossing the Sierra <br />Nevada. This may, in part, be due to the barrier in- <br />duced southerly jet and surface drag. This barrier effect <br />may have contributed to splitting of the upper and <br />lower cold front for this event. <br />In summary, similarities have been found in the <br />structure and organization of this precipitation event <br />to Browning's (1985) split-front model and to rneso- <br />scale features observed by Hobbs (1978) in the Pacific <br />Northwest. Satellite and radar features are shown to <br />be associated with upper-level wind maxima, their as- <br />sociated vertical circulations, and frontal boundaries. <br />These transitions have a significant impact on the <br />cloud's precipitation process, and, in turn, lead to spe- <br />cific increases or decreases in cloud SLW. Increases or <br />higher values in SLW are associated with either gen- <br />erally lower precipitation rates and decreasing cloud <br />depth or an increasing CSR. <br /> <br />rEB 7,1985 <br /> <br />10 <br /> <br />8 <br /> <br />HOUR (UTe) <br />FIG. 4. Precipitation rate as measured by the Auburn weighing gauge for 7-8 February 1985. <br />