Laserfiche WebLink
<br />5. Conclusions <br /> <br />It proved feasible to clear the administrative path for an <br />emergency cloud-seeding operation, organizl~ it, and <br />put it in the field, all in the space of thirty days. The <br />operation thus initiated was performed in cornplianc'~ <br />with the best current state-of-the-art except for a few <br />equipment and supply problems that usually occur <br />arising from the lack of sufficient time for preparation. <br /> <br />There were 33 days when seeding was done over both <br />watersheds (Gatun/Madden and Bayano), 21 days <br />when only Gatun-Madden was seeded, and 5 days <br />when only Bayano was seeded. Thus the total of <br />Gatun/Madden, seeding days was 54 and the: total of <br />Bayano seeding days was 38. There were 21 days when <br />no seeding was done because suitable clouds were not <br />seen in either watershed, and 10 days when both <br /> <br />aircraft were out of service due to mechanical prob- <br />lems. <br /> <br />The indications of precipitation response to the seeding, <br />hased on very limited data, were all in the direction of <br />increase and were fully consistent with expectations <br />derived from cloud models and general precipitation <br />physics. On 9 occasions, cloud developments strongly <br />suggestive of favorable seeding influence were seen <br />from the air on the radar screen, with 19 other <br />occasions of weakly favorabl,e indications and a further <br />24 occasions with no indications of effect. A strong <br />connection was noted between the appearance of <br />favorable influence and the amount of rain that fell, but <br />the data were insufficient to establish whether or not <br />this could be attributed to the seeding. <br /> <br />13 <br />