Laserfiche WebLink
<br />prognostic gridded field input data out to 48 hours, needs to be verified. To examine how <br />well the NWS large scale models estimate OAK upper-air atmospheric sounding profiles, <br />NWS personnel at the CNRFC are comparing prognostic grid point data with observed OAK <br />rawinsonde data. How accurately the orographic precipitation model computes QPFs depends <br />substantially on the quality of the input data. If the ongoing NWS model comparisons are <br />encouraging, as anticipated, the CNRFC intends to use the orographic precipitation model <br />operationally with NWS model prognostic gridded field data for input. <br /> <br />As mentioned previously, the orographic precipitation model has already been set up to run <br />for other Central Valley Project watersheds in California. However, the model still has to <br />be "calibrated" for those individual watersheds. <br /> <br />Of particular interest to the Mid-Pacific Region's Central Valley Project Water and Power <br />Operations Office are the Shasta-Trinity watersheds locatedin the northern part ofthe State. <br />The area that produces inflow into the reservoir behind Spring Creek Debris Dam is of <br />particular interest. Once this reservoir is full, the Spring Creek Debris Dam has a high <br />probability of spilling. Unfortunately, the topographic effects which largely control the <br />precipitation regime in the Shasta area are quite complex. Among other things, the airflow <br />is greatly distorted. Sample runs of the orographic precipitation model indicate that it does <br />not produce enough precipitation in the lower elevations of the Shasta area, even when <br />constraining the flow to be directly up-valley. Thus, other objective QPF techniques are <br />necessary for this area. From observation, precipitation rate is still usually directly <br />proportional to wind speed. A dependency on 700-mb wind direction also exists. Better <br />quantification of these wind dependencies is needed. Causal mechanisms that occasionally <br />produce slow moving to quasi-stationary narrow convective bands in the area also need to be <br />identified. <br /> <br />. Recommendation - Reclamation should perform a climatological study of major storms <br />that have occurred in the Shasta-Trinity watersheds during the past 10 to 12 yr for the <br />purpose of calibrating existing objective aids and developing new objective aids. The data <br />should be partitioned in 10-degree intervals based upon the 700-mb wind direction, using <br />Oakland, California, and Medford, Oregon, rawinsondes. <br /> <br />2.8.2 Future NWS Hydrologic Forecasting Support <br /> <br />The NWS has the hydrologic forecasting responsibility for the Nation. The mission of the <br />NWS hydrologic service program is to save lives, reduce property damage, and contribute to <br />the maximum use of the Nation's water resources. At the present time, the NWS meets its <br />hydrologic responsibility through the efforts of 13 RFCs (River Forecast Centers) located <br />throughout the United States (fig. 8). The CNRFC located in Sacramento is the forecast <br />center responsible for the Central Valley Project area. The NWS takes great care to ensure <br />that hydrologic forecasts come from only one source so as to not confuse the public. <br /> <br />. Recommendation - Reclamation's research work to improve QPFs and/or runoff forecasts <br />for specific watersheds, such as the work done in this study for the ARB, should be closely <br />coordinated with the NWS's RFC that is responsible for the area. <br /> <br />A good data reporting network is the most important element required to support hydrologic <br />forecasting. Reclamation is a close cooperator with the NWS on developing and maintaining <br />a large part of the hydrologic data reporting network (e.g., the Early Warning Systems). Of <br /> <br />20 <br />