Laserfiche WebLink
<br />1340 <br /> <br />JOURNAL OF APPLIED METEOROLOGY <br /> <br />VOLUME 28 <br /> <br />data) to 5.3:1 (summer convective storm data) when <br />compared with the raw data. <br />The contents of the compressed archival file are listed <br />in Fig. 2. The frames are not all 8-bit bytes as they <br />were in Fig. 1. Whereas the raw radar record has one <br />header (housekeeping) field and four radials of range- <br />bin data, the basic archival file logical record structure <br />has a header for each radial, and each radial primarily <br />has range bins with above-noise threshold DVIP values. <br />The logical records are concatenated to create a large <br />blocked physical record. The error flag information (if <br />at least one condition has been flagged) is appended <br />to each logical record as a 160-bit flag array. Each bit <br />set in the flag array has a specific meaning that pertains <br />to the radial (logical record) of which it is a part. <br />All of the header information from the raw records <br />except RHI/PPI (which indicates whether antenna <br />scan was at constant elevation or azimuth angle) and <br />record count is carried over to the archival records. In <br />addition, certain parameters computed during the pro- <br />cessing become part of the archival records. Examples <br />are elevation increment, beginning of new volume <br />scans, DVIP noise threshold, and a bit map that de- <br />scribes the elevation steps found in each volume scan. <br />Each subfield contains one or more (consecutive) <br />range bins with above-noise threshold DVIP values, <br />and, at most, pairs of noise bins enclosed between non- <br />noise signals. If a radial (250 bins) has an echo signal <br />in at least every third range bin, there would be one <br />subfield for that logical record. If range bins 10, 12, 13, <br />16, 19, 30 to 35, and 164 of a particular radial have <br />echo signals, there would be three subfields in that log- <br />ical record: 10 bins starting at bin 10; 6 bins starting <br />at 30; and 1 bin starting at 164. <br />DVIP values for bins 254 to 256 in the three range <br />bins following aircraft location information in each of <br />four radials in the raw records (see Fig. 1) are not pro- <br />cessed over to the archival file. <br />The archival files are used by scientists and engineers <br />for meteorological data analyses. These analysts gen- <br />erally convert the DVIP units to meteorological reflec- <br />tivity units using a modified version of the Probert- <br />Jones ( 1962) radar equation. Schroeder and Klazura <br />( 1978) discuss pertinent calibration and transfer func- <br />tion information that is relevant to this conversion. <br /> <br />4. Concluding remarks <br /> <br />This paper describes a digital radar data-processing <br />scheme that has evolved during a 12-year period from <br />a time-consuming computer/human procedure to a <br /> <br />fully automated system. The edit checking flags, which <br />until recently could only be scanned visually, have now <br />been incorporated into the data records. This allows <br />analysts to use marginal data records much less te- <br />diously than in the past by allowing them to automate <br />special treatment of selected problems as opposed to <br />conducting visual searches for problems from micro- <br />fiche reports. <br />This automated processing system, which includes <br />flagging into the archival format, was used for data <br />collected during a full season. Raw radar tapes for any <br />given day were processed to a final archival version <br />within a couple of days. Previously, human inspection <br />and decisions to correct or discard records slowed this <br />process immensely. <br />Before implementing a scheme such as this, data <br />managers need to consider carefully the risks along with <br />the advantages. One obvious risk that needs to be con- <br />sidered, especially when raw data are not kept per- <br />manently, is the possibility of irretrievable data loss <br />due to software errors in processing raw data to a new <br />format. It is safer to retain the raw data as the archival <br />form. However, the advantages of significantly reduced <br />data volumes and data that are quality checked are <br />great motivators to assume some of the risks. In ad- <br />dition, risks are significantly reduced by employing a <br />processing step that compares information contained <br />within the archival file with original information in the <br />raw file. (Note: This is performed on each radar tape.) <br />As breakthroughs in data storage technology continue <br />to occur, it may become feasible not to destroy raw <br />data. Even now, the optical disk and related WORM <br />(Write Once Read Many) technologies may make this <br />option viable for some. However, the raw data should <br />be considered only a safety backup source. <br />The archival format has other advantages over the <br />raw format in addition to saving space. Analysts are <br />relieved of the complexity of comparing and detecting <br />suspicious values, determining data noise thresholds, <br />or deciding when a new sweep or volume scan starts. <br /> <br />Acknowledgments. The authors would like to thank <br />Ron Miller for his assistance in computer-generating <br />Figs. 1 and 2. <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />"1 <br /> <br />REFERENCES <br /> <br />'t, <br /> <br />Probert-Jones, J. R., 1962: The radar equation in meteorology. Quart. <br />1. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 88,485-495. <br />Schroeder, M. J., and G. E. Klazura, 1978: Computer processing of <br />digital radar data gathered during HIPLEX. J. Appl. Meteor., <br />17,498-507. <br />