My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WMOD00525
CWCB
>
Weather Modification
>
DayForward
>
WMOD00525
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/28/2009 2:40:33 PM
Creation date
4/24/2008 2:52:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Weather Modification
Title
A Proposed Wintertime Weather Modification Research Program for Colorado
Date
1/1/1980
Weather Modification - Doc Type
Report
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />go parallel to the barrier. Temperature inversions or stable <br />layers near the surface accentuate this effect and may cause ice <br />nuclei from ground generators to be trapped and thus not seed <br />the clouds at all. Another possibility is that artificial nuclei <br />may continue to enter the clouds after it is desirable if disper- <br />sion has been retarded. Perhaps the best delivery technique for <br />the treatment of seeding opportunities is a combination of ground- <br />based and airborne systems, depending upon atmospheric conditions. <br />Uncertainties related to the targeting of the cloud seeding <br />material that were stated above demonstrate the need to conduct <br />diffusion and tracer studies in conjunction with cloud seeding <br />operations. These studies would be directed toward identifying <br />the meteorological conditions for which seeding with ground-based <br />artificial ice nucleus generators is the most effective and 1:hose <br />which are not effective. A related question that needs to be <br />addressed is at what elevations on the mountain barrier can <br />tracer material be identified? The target for winter orographic <br />cloud seeding is the mountainous area generally located at <br />elevations above 9,000 feet MSL. The local populace desires the <br />documentation that there is no seeding effect below 8,000 feet <br />MSL upwind of the target area. They also desire to know to ~mat <br />extent the region between 8,000 and 9,000 feet MSL is affected. <br />Observations need to be made that will provide this assurance and <br />information. <br />The ecological and sociological interactions of cloud <br />seeding progranls definitely need to be considered. These con- <br />siderations cannot be an afterthought; they have to be part of <br />the planning process for any precipitation augmentation project. <br />Studies which have been conducted, specifically the San Juan <br />Ecology project~,9 have led to a consensus in the scientific <br />community that no significant environmental effects will occur <br />during the time frame spanned by a five-to-ten-year cloud seeding <br />program. However, some environmental monitoring should accompany <br />long-term opera.tional programs to act as a barometer for any <br />subtle environrr~ntal changes that could indicate future significant <br />effects upon the ecology of the area. <br /> <br />-14- <br /> <br />K~ <br /> <br /> <br />~ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.