Laserfiche WebLink
<br />.. <br /> <br />Subtle biological effects might arise from the partly electrical <br />nature of living cells and their components. Nerve cells communicate <br />through electrical impulses and electrochemical substances, and macromolecules <br />assembled within cells have characteristic resonant electrical frequencies, <br />The assembly process may be affected by electric fields. There is suggestive <br />empirical evidence for biological effects of electric fields but basic <br />research on the subject is just beginning. The Department of Energy has <br />initiated research on possible pathology associated with electrical fields <br />and expects to have preliminary results before 1981 ~2. The possibility of <br />mitigation to reduce the ground-level electric field to those of the natural <br />environment has not yet been investigated. Shielding by grounded conductors <br />strung beneath the high-voltage conductors would appear to be a simple means <br />of mitigation, <br /> <br />The environment exposed to these effects would be mostly the forests <br />and tundra of arctic North America, In forested zones, the largest environ- <br />mental disturbance would be tree-cutting under the transmission line and the <br />building of access road. In tundra country, the problem of roadbuilding <br />would become more acute because of sensitivity of tundra vegetation to <br />disturbance, In transition regions, forests are restricted to low, sheltered <br />habitats and placement of powerline towers on elevated points would minimize <br />the need for cutting, <br /> <br />If the project were to speed commercialization of superconductive <br />transmission lines, the impacts of constructing these lines (not unlike <br />those of today's large pipelines) would be substituted for those of overhead <br />transmission lines, not only in the project area but probably elsewhere in <br />the country and the world, <br /> <br />4, Cumulative Impact of the Whole Projected Complex <br /> <br />By far the greatest environmental impact of the projected complex <br />taken as a whole would come from displacement of fuel-burning, fossil and <br />nuclear, in conventional power plants. It would at least temper the growing <br />impacts of air pollution, waste disposal" acid rain, and atmospheric carbon <br />dioxide. 'As world fuel prices rise, the beneficial effect on the cost of <br />electricity and the international balance of trade could be considerable, <br />and would spread a ripple effect to all parts of the economy. Diminished <br />reliance on foreign resources and trade routes would strengthen the national <br />defense. The inexorable exhaustion of fossil fuels and petrochemicals would <br />be at least delayed. <br /> <br />Adverse impacts of the project as a whole would be mainly those <br />incident to construction. These also may be considered as displacing the <br />impacts of constructing conventional power plants that would otherwise be <br />built to serve the same demands. Most of the projected construction would <br />be in remote, unpopulated areas where. it would be least objectionable, <br />Although there are unresolved questions of long-term indirect effects on <br />some elements of the environment, especially wildlife, these are far less <br />acute than those posed by great enlargement of conventional power plants. <br /> <br />D, Conclusions and Implications <br /> <br />It is essential to recognize that it has been appropriate within the <br />frame of reference of this presentation to visualize the environmental <br />