Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />(1.4 million acre-ft) per year in the Colorado River Basin <br />and 490 million m3 (400,000 acre-ft) per year in adjoining <br />bas ins. <br /> <br />Figure 2 shows the components of the Colorado River Basin <br />augmentation plan with the core San Juan program. Two important <br />studies are recommended as parallel efforts with the core pro- <br />gram. The transferability studies are considered a scientific <br />prerequisite to extension of operational precipitation manage- <br />ment in other Colorado River subbasins. The parallel effort will <br />insure that these studies are completed in time to meet the 1989 <br />Basinwide operational date. The estimated cost of the 7-year <br />transferability study program is 58.20 million. <br /> <br />The second parallel study is the ground-based seeding feasibility <br />study. Although it is not a prerequisite to beginning Basinwide <br />operations in 1989, it is a highly desirable option to determine <br />the viability of this seeding mode in view of its potential cost <br />savings over aircraft seeding. The estimated cost of this 6-year <br />optional study is $5.60 million. <br /> <br />Funding requirements for the San Juan Operational Cloud Seeding <br />Project and the parallel studies are shown by fiscal year in <br />table 1. <br /> <br />The proposed program outlines a plan to meet environmental and <br />social impact analyses and the reporting requirements involved <br />in the transition from research to operational precipitation <br />management by the Federal Government. The San Juan Initiation <br />and Preoperational Phases may qualify for a "categorical <br />exclusion" frOD formal reporting requirements under Departmental <br />and Water and Power Instructions. A formal environmental state- <br />ment will be required to begin the Operational Phase. Public <br />involvement and community response programs are highlighted as <br />a key component of the overall project effort. Legal considera- <br />tions and continuing questions concerning social costs related <br />to precipitation management are discussed. <br /> <br />1-2 <br />