My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WMOD00510
CWCB
>
Weather Modification
>
DayForward
>
WMOD00510
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/28/2009 2:40:26 PM
Creation date
4/24/2008 2:49:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Weather Modification
Title
The Practicability of Dry Ice for On-Top Seeding of Convective Clouds
Date
1/1/1978
Weather Modification - Doc Type
Report
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />52 <br /> <br />JOURNAL OF APPLIED METEOROLOGY <br /> <br />VOLUME 17, <br /> <br />TABLE 3. Approximate normalization of ice concentration <br />measurements (CSI's IPC= 100 i-I). <br /> <br />Counter code <br /> <br />Date <br /> <br />IPC <br />CSI UW <br /> <br />PMS2 <br />CSI UW <br /> <br />16 June 76 <br />8 July 76 <br /> <br />100 <br />100 <br /> <br />23 <br /> <br />42 <br />33 <br /> <br />50 i-I <br />i-I <br /> <br />[ice particle counters (IPC) and Particle Measuring <br />Systems (PMS) probes] readily produce data (Turner <br />and Radke, 1973; Knollenberg, 1970), but spurious <br />measurements can occur. Scattered sunlight and large <br />waterdrops can increase the counts of the IPC. devices, <br />and an adjustable detector threshold prevents detection <br />of miniature crystals. Theoretically, crystals having <br />their c axis parallel to the laser beam should not be <br />detected at all. Heavily rimed crystals may block the <br />beam rather than rotate it and thus escape detection. <br />The PMS one dimensional counters cannot distinguish <br />among water drops, ice and artifacts. Crystals whose <br />smallest dimension is small compared to a channel <br />width may not be counted. The 50% light extinction <br />threshold may allow some flat transparent crystals to <br />escape detection. Intercomparisons of all the instru- <br />ments in the same cloud are therefore needed. <br />For a preliminary intercomparison, data from two <br />abundantly glaciated clouds were examined. One was <br />a natural cloud top penetrated by both the Convergence <br />Systems, Inc. (CSI) Aero Commander and the Univer- <br />sity of Washington (UW) B-23 on 16 June 1976. The <br />cloud had crystal concentrations well in excess of <br />100 t-1. The other was a dry ice seeded cloud penetrated <br />by CSI on 8 July 1976 and having typical concentra- <br />tions of about 45 t-1. CSI's ice particle counter almost <br />always yielded the highest readings. Table 3 presents <br />the approximate measurements of three other instru- <br />ments when CSI's IPC is normalized to 100 crystals <br />t-1. These normalization factors have a variance of at <br />least 25%, due especially to crystal size and type, and <br />should be used as general guides only. The instruments <br />have been normalized to CSI's IPC for convenience and <br />because all optical counters are likely to miss some <br />crystals; unless a counter gives multiple counts for <br />some crystals or has an incorrectly determined sample <br />volume, the highest counting instrument should be <br />most nearly correct. The time constant on the CSI-IPC <br />lets ice particles up to 1 cm diameter be counted only <br />once. <br />On the 16 June 1976 intercomparison flight, the <br />two aircraft flew a similar but not necessarily identical <br />track through the same cloud with about a 3 km <br />separation between aircraft. Intercomparison data <br />between the other instruments in Table 2 have not <br />yet been examined. In discussions with CSI and UW <br />personnel it was agreed that the UW-IPC instrument <br />was less sensitive than the CSI-IPC; its threshold was <br /> <br />adjusted to ensure no counting of large water drops but _ <br />at the expense of not counting all small crystals. ., <br />Cold room calibrations (CSI, personal communica- <br />tion) of the CSI-IPC (modeled after the UW version) <br />showed near zero counting efficiency for 50 J.lm diameter <br />crystals and about 20% counting efficiency for 150 J.lm <br />diameters for presumably planar crystals grown <br />between - 16 and - 20oC. A personal communication <br />from PMS personnel confirms a counting efficiency <br />of about 20% for depolarization instruments, with <br />variations due to crystal type and orientation. The <br />efficiency-size trend was confirmed on the 8 July 1976 <br />experiment. While the crystals were still very small <br />immediately after seeding, the CSI-IPC counted fewer <br />crystals than the PMS2 instrument; after the crystals <br />had grown, it counted more than the PMS2 instrument. <br />These efficiency corrections have not been applied to <br />the data discussed herein; to apply them would, of <br />course, increase the crystal concentration values given. <br />The CSIRO foil impactor (Bethwaite et at., 1966; <br />Hobbs, 1977) was cautiously used because it did not <br />have heaters to prevent rime from building up and <br />immobilizing the shutter or tearing the foil. It was <br />rarely operated on initial passes to avoid the rime <br />problems. Its use was delayed until the cloud began <br />to visibly glaciate or could be assumed to have a <br />significant consumption 'of supercooled water by the <br />growing crystals. The natural background of ice <br />crystals at the time of seeding is therefore not available a <br />for most Australian clouds. The CSIRO impactor was ., <br />operated at about 6 s intervals with an exposure time <br />of about 0.2 s to avoid overexposure of the foil. These <br />values were varied slightly from year to year but were <br />precisely determined with an oscilloscope. <br />No absolute calibration of the collection efficiency <br />of the foil impactor was made. The 25 J.lm thick <br />aluminum foil was examined under an 8 to 40 X <br />microscope. The illumination was adjusted so that the <br />clean foil appeared bright and any dents dark. Unex- <br />posed portions were also examined for comparison. <br />On 8 December 1972 an altocumulus cloud was <br />seeded along a line with dry ice. The - 70C columns <br />produced were sampled 12-36 min later. Linear <br />impressions of random orientation could be observed <br />among the dents in the exposed portions of the foil. <br />It is assumed that these are crystal length impressions. <br />A spectrum of these lengths (sample size 829 impres- <br />sions) is shown in Fig. 2. Ryan et at. (1974) have <br />indicated that -70C columns can reach these lengths ' <br />in about 5 min. The lower sizes represent either the <br />smallest sizes sampled or the threshold of detecta.bility <br />on foil, or a combination of the two. <br />In Fig. 2b the cumulative distribution appears to be <br />lognormal (straight line). The departures from the line <br />are possibly indicative of irregularities in the selection <br />of crystals to be measured. Departures to the left of <br />the line at small sizes, had they occurred, could have <br />been indicative of possible truncation due to insensitiv- _ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.