Laserfiche WebLink
<br />counter showed the leading edge, defined by the first definite rise in <br />response, to have a minimum time of 25 sec and a maximum of 37 sec. <br />Applications of 9alibrated .values o,f mean and mode times of response, <br />though possessing more variance, gave reasonable agreement to. the <br />other two means of plume positioning. It should be stressed that the <br />NCAR counter is not a "turn key" device. Its use should assume the <br />presence of an experienced operator. <br /> <br />In all cases which had westerly wind, the plume was found over the <br />Bangtail Ridge in IFR conditions. The highest level the plume was <br />detected over the target was 11 kft (3 kft AGL). Twice the plume was <br />found up to 12 kft over the Main Ridge (3 kft AGL). VFR plume tracing <br />was done in the winters of 1970-71 and 1971-72, mostly over the Main <br />Ridge to verify that the ground-released plumes did indeed get <br />transported over the ridge. For this earlier tracing, the plume from <br />the southern of the two generator sites (the one reestablished for <br />January) was always found. Plumes were found up to 10.5 kft in this <br />ear lier work. <br /> <br />] <br />I <br /> <br />The afternoon of January 15th was presented as a case study for the <br />workshop. On this day, the plume transport was such that there were <br />two control areas on the traverses; north and south of the plume. <br />There was a relative abundance of SLW (supercooled liquid water) as <br />well. For this mission the seeding generator was shut off at the <br />approximate time that a series of 9 kft passes was started over the <br />Bangtail Ridge. This introduced a temporal control as well as the <br />usual spatial control, i.e., north and south of the plume. Ambient <br />temperatures were unseasonably warm on this day as for most of the <br />month, and -10.6 to -8.70C were observed at 9 kft. The <br />hygrothermograph on top of the Main Bridger Ridge recorded -90C and <br />that of the seeding site recorded -5 to -40C. The seeding site had an <br />elevation of 7150 ft. <br /> <br />Figure 1 shows ice particle concentrations averaged over 2 km <br />intervals measured from the 2D-C probe. The approximate plume core <br />positions are indicated by an "X". The concentrations are clearly <br />higher in the vicinity of the plume. There was a tendency for <br />elevated concentrations over the southern control area. It is <br />plausible for this to be caused by the AgI plume because of horizontal <br />wind shear with ice particles settling downward from higher levels <br />where the wind was more northerly. It took approximately 1 hr after <br />the generator was shut off to detect a decrease of ice nuclei in the <br />"seeded" volume. The ice nuclei plume disappeared 20 minutes later. <br />It would have taken approximately 1 hr. for the 9 kft winds to advect <br />the AgI from the seeding site to the flight path. The additional 20 <br />min lag was probably due to slack winds in the vicinity of the seeding <br />site and residual AgI within the tree cover. Prior to the decrease <br />ifi counts, an average of 88 counts were registered by the NCAR counter <br />for each pass (not adjusted for chamber losses). <br /> <br />Software developed by E. Holroyd, BUREC Montrose, CO., had the <br />capability of estimating the precipitation rate using the 2D-C data <br />(described in a workshop presentation). Figure 2, second panel, <br />shows the average precipitation rates for the 9 kft passes prior to <br />plume reduction over the same 2 km intervals as for Fig. 1. The <br />precipitation rates were clearly elevated in the vicinity of the <br />plume. Figure 2 also graphs ice particle concentrations showing a <br />strong correspondence between this and precipitation, with the high <br />values occurring in the vicinity of the plume. Figure 3 is analogous <br />to Fig. 2 but for the single pass having only one count indicated by <br />the NCAR counter. Both the ice crystal concentrations and calculated <br />snowfall for 2 km averaged intervals are far lower than for the <br /> <br />30 <br />