Laserfiche WebLink
<br />WORKSHOP SUMMARY <br /> <br />Re-examination of Some Results from the CRBPP <br />William A. COQlper <br /> <br />1.. Summary of the experiment <br /> <br />Although the Colorado River Basin pilot Project (CRBPP) <br />has many weaknesses in comparison to more modern field <br />experiments (e.g., because of the lack of radar or radar <br />data, and the limited and early-generation airborne <br />measurements), it is still the last fully randomized <br />operational program incorporating physical observations in <br />the Colorado River Basin. A strength of the experiment is <br />that there were physical observations (surface and airborne) <br />collected in context of the randomized experiment, where <br />seeding was conducted and effects on snowfall could be <br />assessed. Many aspects of the results appear clearer in the <br />context of the last 10 yrs and subsequent field experiments <br />in nearby areas. The observations of high ice concentrations <br />and low liquid water contents have generally been supported <br />by subsequent measurements. <br />The randomized experiment was conducted for 5 yrs, during <br />the winters of 1970-1 to 1974-5. The experiment was <br />generally based on the successful results from CLIMAX, <br />although the CLIMAX design was not followed in detail. The <br />earlier CLIMAX results led to the prediction that a 10:1 <br />cost:benefit ratio could be expected for added precipitation <br />in the Colorado River Basin. The experiment was a target- <br />only design, with a 24 hr experimental unit. The <br />experimental day was declared according to criteria which <br />varied slightly during the experiment, but included <br />requirements that there be forecast precipitation in the <br />target area, that the 500 mb temperature be >-230C, that the <br />mean wind be toward the barrier, and that previous snowpack <br />fell below the suspension criteria. There were 33 ground- <br />based generators, dispersing a NaIjAgI mixture. Averge <br />precipitation in the target area varies from 20-100 cm, and <br />typically falls on about 90 days. Approximately half have <br />500 mb temperatures suitable, and ac:count for about half of <br />the total precipitation. The hope was that a 50% increase on <br />these suitable days would thus lead to a 25% overall increase <br />in precipitation. <br /> <br />2. The statistical evaluations <br /> <br />The primary evaluation of the experiment was performed <br />by Elliott et ale (1978). The snowfall on seeded days tended <br />to be less than on unseeded days, although the results were <br /> <br />9 <br />