My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WMOD00509
CWCB
>
Weather Modification
>
DayForward
>
WMOD00509
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/28/2009 2:40:26 PM
Creation date
4/24/2008 2:49:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Weather Modification
Title
Physics of Winter Orographic Precipitation and it's Modification - Summary of Presentations
Date
10/1/1985
Weather Modification - Doc Type
Report
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
93
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />about 5 NM. <br />The points on Figure 3 with the crosses are copied from <br />Figure 4, where the major SF6 detection points are marked. <br />The comparison of the points on Figure 3 with the release <br />point marked on the map, where distances are about the same scale <br />suggests an apparent change in the drift direction from about <br />1100 T to 1600 T after crossing the peak. <br />There is a strong correlation between altitude changes and <br />SF6 signal which is evident from the plot. There is little <br />doubt, however, that no SF6 was detected upstream from points 4 <br />and 5 in Figure 4 on the higher run, at a location just before <br />point K. On the following reverse leg there does seem to be some <br />SF6 after point L. The aircraft altitude was reduced by about <br />500 ft to about 100 or 200 ft above terrain for the detection at <br />points 4 and 5. Since SF6 was not found at one of the higher <br />runs upstream this seems to indicate that the SF6 may tend to <br />remain close to the ground even when there is appreciable convec- <br />tion. <br />Flights were conducted on the following days: 26 March, and <br />7, 9, 10, 11 and 22 April. The most satisfactory flight was the <br />last one, which is discussed above. <br />Thus the SF6 tracing program has proved to be a viable <br />operating scheme and the initial results have been of interest in <br />that on very convective days with little wind the SF6 was found <br />only within about a mile of the release point. When wind is <br />present the SF6 is found several hundred feet above the ground in <br />convective conditions but in a comparatively narrow band. The <br />SF6 flowed around the 1500 ft hill we investigated but <br />experienced a clear change in direction after passing the hill, <br />possibly due to the wind funneling down a valley upstream. <br /> <br />2. The Convection Over Snow <br />Earlier work has indicated that over the ocean evaporation <br />from the sea will provide water vapor which will drive convec- <br />tion, because it is less dense than air. Over a snow field the <br />same mechanism will apply, since snow also evaporates. Although <br />the convection is slow it will operate in completely overcast <br />conditions and may provide a mechanism whe~eby ground release of <br />seeding material can find its way into clouds. <br />The model based on the entity entrainment concept of plume <br />structure has been reconfigured to describe these conditions, and <br />the calculations indicate that such behavior will occur. Some <br />new restrictions relate to the higher vapor pressure of the water <br />which condenses at cloud base, relative to the surface ice, so <br />that the cloud base must be high enough to be colder than the <br />surface and hence have a lower mixing ratio. <br /> <br />3. Ice Formation <br />Consideration of the continuing turbulent motion in cumulus <br />clouds has led to the idea that as the cloud dilutes from the <br /> <br />6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.