Laserfiche WebLink
<br />292 <br /> <br />JOURNAL OF APPLIED METEOROLOGY <br /> <br />VOLUME 29 <br /> <br />chopper on the aircraft which produced pellets 5 to 20 <br />mm in diameter. Clear air tests indicated that the CO2 <br />formed a vertical curtain extending 700 m below the <br />aircraft. <br />Although initially one successful experiment was <br />conducted with 20 g AgI pyrotechnic flares (Stewart <br />and Marwitz 1982), difficulties that appeared in later <br />years, coupled with the expense of the flares and the <br />warm temperatures at which seeding was required, <br />nearly precluded their use. Clear air tests indicated that <br />in some batches less than half of the flares burned for <br />the 30 s required. Activity tests in a cloud chamber <br />indicated reduced yield of ice nuclei by two to three <br />orders of magnitude compared to AgI burned in ace- <br />tone, particularly for flares with the tracer cesium added <br />(DeMott and Grant 1986). Thus to ensure glaciation <br />in clouds seeded at temperatures> -lOoC, CO2 was <br />believed to be the best material. <br />During the last year of the experiment the seeding <br />material was changed to an AgI NH41 NH4Cl04 mix- <br />ture burned in an acetone solution. This was done for <br />several reasons. The seeding material is economical <br />and easier to handle than CO2. The delivery system is <br />simple, and the dispensing of seeding material can be <br />directly confirmed by measuring the flame temperature <br />of the acetone burner. Seeding can be conducted for <br />long periods of time with a small amount of material, <br />and finally, the AgI can be used as a tracer since it can <br />be measured with an ice nucleus counter. The AgI was <br />released at a rate of 0.4 g km -1 using a generator con- <br />taining a 3 percent by weight solution of AgI NH41 <br />NH4Cl04 with the ammonium perchlorate at a 30 mole <br />ratio. This solution was chosen since tests indicated it <br />would produce approximately 10 13 nuclei g-l at -60C <br />(DeMott et al. 1983). With this activity a rough cal- <br />culation of the ICC resulting from seeding can be made. <br />Assuming that the AgI "cylinder" expands at 1.0 m <br />S-1 and that 80 percent of the ice nuclei have activated <br />(DeMott et aI. 1983), the ICC would be approximately <br />10 L -1 after 10 min. However, if contact nucleation is <br />the primary nucleation mechanism for AgI NH41, as <br />DeMott et al. suggest, then this estimate is too high. <br />Including the rate at which ice nuclei are scavenged by <br />cloud droplets (Slinn 1971), and assuming 100 cm -3 <br />of5 11m cloud drops, instead of the 2000 to 4000 cm-3 <br />in the cloud chamber where the material was tested, <br />the expected ICC would be <1.0 L -1 after 10 min. If <br />this is the case, increases in ICC due to seeding would <br />not be measurable. <br /> <br />3. Case studies <br /> <br />The following two case studies present results from <br />one placebo experiment and two experiments that <br />demonstrate seeding effects. The first case study in- <br />cludes the placebo experiment and a seeding experi- <br />ment using AgI NH41 NH4Cl04. The second case study <br />is a seeding experiment using dry ice on a day when <br /> <br />the cloud was too shallow for the research aircraft to <br />conduct its normal measurement profile. <br />To infer seeding effects from aircraft data requires <br />knowing coincidence times between aircraft and seed- <br />line position. To accomplish this, seedlines were ad- <br />vected downwind using aircraft measured winds, or <br />the aircraft pointer data, and were then compared with <br />the aircraft flight path to determine intersection times. <br />Data from the particle probes on the aircraft were then <br />examined for ice crystal plumes at the intersection <br />times. Peaks in the ICC data were expected for seeded <br />cases. The largest source of error in this technique oc- <br />curs from the use of a constant advection speed for the <br />seedlines; however, an error of 2 m s -I results in a <br />displacement of only 3.6 km in seedline position after <br />30 min, which corresponds to < 1 min of aircraft data. <br />Thus, this technique should provide a good indication <br />of where to expect seeding effects in the aircraft data. <br />When AgI was used seedline penetration could be <br />confirmed directly using the NCAR ice nucleus counter <br />on the aircraft. Empirical tests of the NCAR counter <br />indicated a 25-40 s delay between intake of ice nuclei <br />and registration of the particles. This delay is consistent <br />with Super and Boe ( 1988). The ice nucleus concen- <br />trations to be presented here only account for sampling <br />volume. Loss to sidewalls and other problems noted <br />by Langer (1973) and Sackiw et al. (1984) were not <br />considered. <br /> <br />'1 <br />I <br /> <br />a. 18 December 1986 <br /> <br />1) CLOUD STRUCTURE AND ORGANIZATION <br /> <br />On the morning of 18 December a weak short-wave <br />trough moved into a split in the upper-level flow over <br />California. The trough weakened considerably by 0000 <br />(all times UTC) 19 December 1986. Preceding the as- <br />sociated surface front was an upper-level cold surge, <br />of the type described by Hobbs (1978), that passed <br />SHR just after the 1500 sounding, Fig. 2. Satellite im- <br />ages (not shown) indicated that a cloud band moved <br />through the Sacramento Valley with the cold surge. <br />The precipitation associated with this cold surge moved <br />over the American River basin between 1430 and 1630. <br />The surface frontal band passed SHR between 1800 <br />and 2100, evidenced by the substantial warming aloft <br />from subsidence behind the front. The frontal band <br />could not be characterized well in the lowest 1400 m, <br />although an increase in precipitation marked passage <br />over KGV between 2300 and 0100. Lack of a strong <br />thermal discontinuity (Fig. 2) and the 4 to 5 hours <br />required to move from SHR to KGV indicate the <br />weakness of the front. Two fixed-target experiments <br />were conducted between 1800 and 2000, after passage <br />of the upper-level cold surge, but prior to passage of <br />the surface cold front. This has been noted by Reynolds <br />and Kuciauskas ( 1988) to be a favonlble location for <br />the development ofSLW. <br />The ascent sounding and MOCA descent by the <br />