Laserfiche WebLink
<br />482 <br /> <br />JOURNAL OF APPLIED METEOROLOGY <br /> <br />VOLUME 29 <br /> <br />Based on research aircraft measurements during the <br />experiment, 1700-2000, the orographic cloud consisted <br />of ice, 30-100 L -Ion the 2D-C, 6-20 L -( on the 2D- <br />P, and almost no liquid water in the FSSP size range. <br />FSSP concentrations, when they existed, were <40 <br />cm -3, with droplets predominantly between 7 and 19 <br />~m diameter. Images from the 2D-C and 2D-P indi- <br />cated that the ice was primarily small graupel and nee- <br />dles. Analysis of the 2D-C, and comparison of the <br />CSIRO and JW liquid water meters, indicated the pos- <br />sibility of many regions of large drops, 100-200 ~m <br />(Rauber and Heggli 1988). At times water drops dom- <br />inated the particle concentrations sensed by the 2D-C <br />and 2D-P, still only low concentrations of drops 7-19 <br />~m were recorded by the FSSP. Needles, or spikes pro- <br />truding out of frozen drops were often seen in the 2D- <br />C images in regions of large drops. <br /> <br />b. Treatment <br /> <br />A seeding experiment was conducted as a test ofthe <br />effectiveness of AgI NH4I NH4Cl04 at -60e. The <br />seeding location was chosen based on measurements <br />by the research aircraft, Fig. 1, which showed a region <br />ofliquid water of 0.05 g m -3 at 10 km west of SHR. <br />This was nearly the only region of liquid water observed <br />during the ascent sounding and descent along the bar- <br />rier by the research aircraft. <br />From 1810 to 1818 the seeder aircraft released AgI <br />NH4I NH4Cl04 at 0.4 g km -( along one 40-km-Iong <br />seedline. The seedline was 10 km west of SHR and <br />oriented nearly north-south, although average winds <br />were from 2350. The seeder aircraft then left the area <br />while the research aircraft tracked the seedline for 1.5 <br />h making perpendicular passes through the seedline. <br /> <br />c. Results of seeding <br /> <br />Measurements by the research aircraft at the seeding <br />location 10 min prior to seeding showed 2D-C con- <br />centrations of 50 L -( . After the seeding material was <br />dispensed the research aircraft made 16 penetrations <br />of the seedline. The air parcel tracking capability of <br />the aircraft was used for the first 11 penetrations. The <br />average advection of an air parcel for these penetrations <br />was 2420 at 18 m S-I. This average advection was used <br />to determine the seedline age during each penetration <br />by the research aircraft. These ages are shown at the <br />bottom of Fig. 2 which displays the research aircraft <br />measurements during the first five penetrations. The <br />first penetration occurred 5 min and the last penetra- <br />tion 92 min after seeding. A strong signal on the IN <br />counter confirmed seedline interception for the first <br />two penetrations at 5 and 12 min after seeding, Fig. <br />2a. On the third and fourth penetrations, 19 and 24 <br />min, however, only a few IN were detected, Fig. 2b. <br />Recall that the IN concentrations are calculated based <br />only on the sampling rate and the number of IN <br />counted, and that there is a 25-40 s delay between' <br />intake of nuclei and detection. Also, because of the <br /> <br />long residence time of nuclei in the chamber and the <br />stochastic nature of ice crystal development, several <br />minutes are required for the instrument to decay to <br />background after sampling a high concentration ofIN. <br />This explains the long tail after sampling of IN at <br />181930 and at 182520. <br />No IN were measured on the next seven penetra- <br />tions, 29-61 min after seeding. Particle concentrations <br />near the seedline during these penetrations were high, <br />and although increases in particle concentration were <br />observed at the expected seedline interception times, <br />they were not different from increases observed away <br />from these locations. Examination of the 2D-C and <br />2D-P images indicated that the particles were a mixture <br />of small particles, possibly water drops ( 1825), graupel, <br />needles and frozen drops with protruding needles or <br />spikes ( 183637), Fig. 3. Decreases in the FSSP droplet <br />concentration and a shift of the droplet distribution to <br />smaller sizes at the seedline interception times at 24 <br />and 29 min indicate that evaporation was occurring <br />there; suggesting a higher depletion rate of water in the <br />seedline compared to surrounding regions. CSIR:O liq- <br />uid water concentrations also decreased between 19 <br />and 24 min; however, based on the ice nucleus mea- <br />surements, the research aircraft was not sampling the <br />seedline after the penetration at 12 min. <br />After the eighth penetration the crew on the research <br />aircraft decided to climb to attempt to intercept again <br />the line ofIN. As the aircraft ascended ice particle con- <br />centrations decreased. Definite increases in ICC were <br />then observed simultaneously with seedline penetra- <br />tions at 55 and 61 min ( not shown). These penetrations <br />were at temperatures < -80e. Because the aircraft had <br />climbed into higher winds its tracking information was <br />invalid; however, clear signals on the ice nucleus coun- <br />ter confirmed seedline penetration for the last five <br />passes, 64-92 min, Fig. 4. Increases in particle con- <br />centration were also observed during these five pene- <br />trations at temperatures between -9 and -12.60C. <br />Note that IN concentrations in the seedline had de- <br />creased from a peak near 300 L -( soon after seeding <br />to a peak near 30 L -( . Still considering the efficiency <br />of the IN counter to be between 1 and 10% a significant <br />number of nuclei were still available. In Fig. 4 the time <br />of seedline interception is based on the peaks observed <br />in ICe. In 3 of the 5 penetrations shown, the point <br />indicated precedes the increase in IN by the delay time <br />of the IN counter, 25-40 s, while in the penetrations <br />at 64 and 77 min the 25-40 s delay indicates that IN <br />were sensed on the edge of the ice crystal plume. In all <br />five penetrations shown, the IN and ICC increase nearly <br />simultaneously, providing reasonable evidence that the <br />increases in ICC are the result of seeding. For these <br />penetrations the advection speed of the seedline in- <br />creased from 18 to 20 m s -1 . After the penetration at <br />92 min the seedline was near the crest and the down- <br />wind edge of cloud. Given the age ofthe seedline and <br />the width of the ice crystal plume, the overall dispersion <br />rate was calculated to be 1.3 ill S-I. <br />