Laserfiche WebLink
<br />478 <br /> <br />JOURNAL OF APPLIED METEOROLOGY <br /> <br />VOLUME 29 <br /> <br />trometer Probe (FSSP) in the 3-45 ~m range with 3 <br />~m resolution, and the following PMS Optical Array <br />Probes: ID-C operated in the range 12.5-187.5 ~m <br />with 12.5 ~m resolution, 2D-C in the 25-800 ~m range <br />with 25 ~m resolution, and 2D-P in the 200-6400 ~m <br />range with 200 ~m resolution (Knollenberg 1981). The <br />research aircraft was capable of measuring the evolu- <br />tion of a packet of ice crystals as it drifted downwind. <br />By integrating true airspeed and heading, the computer <br />on the aircraft could direct the pilot to make repeated <br />penetrations of a point drifting with the wind (Cooper <br />and Lawson 1984; Huggins and Rodi 1985). <br />The ice nucleus counter on the aircraft was devel- <br />oped by the National Center for Atmospheric Research <br />(Langer 1973) and is essentially a small cloud chamber <br />where ice nuclei (IN) can activate and the resultant <br />ice crystals can grow to a detectable size. For the SCPP <br />the temperature of the cloud chamber was held at <br />- 200C and air was sampled at a rate of 10.0 L min -I. <br />Although the instrument easily senses high concentra- <br />tions of IN there are delays in the response and relax- <br />ation time of the instrument. Empirical tests of the <br />counter indicated a 25-40 s delay between intake of <br />IN and registration of the particles, while it frequently <br />took up to 3 min for the chamber to be purged of IN <br />sampled in a seedline. The 25-40 s delay measured <br />here is_consistevt with tests reported by Super~et-al. <br />(1988). Ice nucleIConcentrations are also difficult to <br />quantify because of a loss of nucleants and ice particles <br />to the inside walls of the chamber. Langer ( 1973) es- <br />timates a 10% counting efficiency, but Sackiw et al. <br />( 1984) reports only a I % counting efficiency. These <br />counting efficiencies are not incorporated into the IN <br />concentrations presented here. Thus the IN concen- <br />trations may be low by a factor of 10 to 100; however, <br />the IN measurements represent activity at the chamber <br />temperature, - 20oC, and will be less at warmer tem- <br />peratures, perhaps up to a factor of 100 at temperatures <br />as warm as -60C. <br />During the SCPP a variety of remote sensing and <br />surface measurements were also available. A 5-cm <br />weather radar was located at Sheridan (SHR) near the <br />base of the Sierra Nevada. Rawinsonde stations were <br />located at SHR and Kingvale (KGV), near the crest <br />of the barrier. Telemetered precipitation gauges with <br />a resolution of 0.1 mm in 5 min (Price and Rilling <br />1987) were distributed throughout the target area. In- <br />tensive surface and remote sensing observations were <br />collected at KGV with a microwave radiometer (Heggli <br />and Rauber 1988), vertically pointing Ka band radar, <br />a 2D-C particle sensor, and a high resolution precipi- <br />tation gauge. <br />The seeder aircraft, a Cessna Aero Commander, <br />burned the AgI NH4I NH4Cl04 in acetone in a pres- <br />surized stainless steel container (Carly-type generator) <br />mounted on the fuselage. The AgI was released at a <br />rate of 0.4 g km -I by burning a 3 percent by weight <br />solution of AgI NH41 NH4Cl04 with the ammonium <br /> <br />perchlorate at a 30 mole ratio. This solution was chosen <br />since tests indicated it would produce approximately <br />1013 nuclei g-I at -60C (DeMott et al. 1983). With <br />this activity a rough calculation of the ice crystal con- <br />centration (ICC) resulting from seeding can be made. <br />Assuming that the AgI disperses at 1.0 m S-I horizon- <br />tally and 0.1 m s -I vertically for winter orographic <br />clouds (Hill 1980), and that 80 percent ofthe IN have <br />activated (DeMott et al. 1983), the ICC would be ap- <br />proximately 40 L -1 after 10 min. However, if as <br />DeMott et al. ( 1983) suggest, contact nucleation is the <br />primary nucleation mechanism for AgI ~I, then this <br />estimate is too high. If the rate at which IN are scav- <br />enged by cloud droplets is included (Slinn 1971), and <br />100 cm -3 of 5 ~m radius cloud drops are assumed, <br />instead of the 2000 to 4000 cm -3 in the cloud chamber <br />where the material was tested, the expected ICC would <br />be 1.0 L -I after 10 min. If this is the case, increases in <br />ICC due to seeding would be difficult to separate from <br />the background. On the other hand, Finnegan and Pit- <br />ter ( 1987) presented evidence indicating that AgI may <br />cause nucleation by condensation freezing when the <br />AgI acetone solution is burned, due to the large amount <br />of water vapor produced. If this occurs then the earlier <br />estimate of 40 L -I is more appropriate. Finnegan and <br />Pitter point out that oxidation of 1 g of acetone pro- <br />_ Quces 0.93 g of water. With this estimate the seeding <br />generator on the aircraft was producing 1.2 g s -I of <br />water, similar to the water production rate during the <br />ground seeding experiments described by Finnegan and <br />Pitter. <br /> <br />3. Case Study <br /> <br />a. Cloud structure and organization <br /> <br />On 22 December 1986 at 1200 (all times expressed <br />in UTC) a short-wave trough moved rapidly from the <br />northwest into a split in the upper-level flow over Utah. <br />In the next 12 hours the wave weakened and moved <br />onshore with the main energy to the north of California. <br />The surface front associated with this wave was in the <br />northwest comer of California at 1200. This weak front <br />was observed to pass SHR after 1500 and KGV at 1700 <br />and preceded most of the precipitation associated with <br />it. Liquid water above 0.5 mm, with peaks to over 1.0 <br />mm, were measured with the radiometer at KGV from <br />1430-1630, but the liquid water diminished to 0.1 mm <br />as the front passed and precipitation began. In the post- <br />frontal air mass a well-defined orographic cloud de- <br />veloped with tops near 5.0 km, -150C, and cloud base <br />near 1.4 km, ooc. Precipitation began at KGV at 1700, <br />just after frontal passage and continued at over 4 mm <br />h -( until 1900. Light and intermittent precipitation, <br />0.5 to 1.0 mm h -I, and liquid water near 0.1 mm were <br />then observed until 0400 on 23 December 1986, with <br />the liquid water persisting until 0700. <br />