Laserfiche WebLink
<br />JUNE 1990 <br /> <br />TERRY DESHLER AND DAVID W. REYNOLDS <br /> <br />487 <br /> <br />ing would have been below the altitude of the research <br />aircraft before natural particle concentrations had de- <br />creased to a level where the seeding effects could have <br />been observed. Also, CO2 may have been ineffective <br />on this day considering the low liquid-water content <br />observed at the seedline. <br />No effects from seeding were observed with radar; <br />however, considering the intensity of natural echo, rel- <br />ative to echoes anticipated from seeding (Deshler et <br />al. 1990), no radar seeding effects were anticipated. <br />Similarly no seeding effects were observed with the <br />surface instrumentation; however, the resolution of the <br />precipitation gauges was above what may be expected <br />from the passage of one seedline, and the seedline did <br />not pass over the heavily instrumented surface station. <br />The final penetration of the seedline, 10 km from <br />the downwind edge of cloud, Fig. 4b, still showed a <br />significant concentration of ice nuclei, suggesting that <br />seeding effects would be limited by the dimensions of <br />the cloud and not by the amount of seeding material <br />released. The unscavenged nuclei at the downwind edge <br />of cloud will pass over the barrier. If they enter another <br />cloud system they could be expected to contribute to <br />the ice formation process in that cloud. Thus, these <br />measurements lend credence to predictions of extra <br />area effects from seeding with AgI (Brown et al. 1978). <br />Although the goal of documenting ice crystal nucle- <br />ation at -60C with AgI NH41 NH4Cl04 was not met, <br />this case presents an outstanding example ofthe ability <br />to track seeding material for a long period of time. It <br />also suggests that AgI NH41 NH4Cl04 is an effective <br />cloud seeding agent with properties in the field that <br />meet or exceed those measured in the laboratory. Using <br />the width of the ice crystal plume on the last penetration <br />(7 km), the length of the seedline (40 km), and as- <br />suming the ice crystal curtain reached the surface 2.5 <br />km below, the volume of cloud affected by seeding can <br />be roughly calculated. The result is 7 X 10 14 L. Sixteen <br />grams of AgI were released, which according to DeMott <br />et al. ( 1983) would give approximately 1016 nuclei ac- <br />tive at -lOoC, assuming all ice nuclei have activated. <br />This amounts to an ice particle concentration of 14 <br />L -1 from seeding in agreement with measurements at <br />92 min that show 10-20 L -1 in the seeded curtain. <br />DeMott et al.'s measurements indicate that all ice nuclei <br />in the cloud chamber activate within 20-30 min, while <br />these field measurements indicate approximately 10% <br />of the ice nuclei still available after 90 min. Given the <br />1-10% counting efficiency of the ice nucleus counter, <br />the 30 L -1 shown in Fig. 4 may represent a relatively <br />high concentration of ice nuclei. This difference in ice <br />nucleus scavenging rate could be attributed to the lower <br />droplet concentration in the natural cloud compared <br />to the cloud chamber where droplet concentrations are <br />higher by a factor of 100. The collection rate in the <br />cloud chamber would be significantly faster because of <br />the high droplet concentration. Considering the ice <br />crystal concentrations observed and the ice nuclei still <br /> <br />available these observations indicate that the activity <br />of this AgI mixture meets or exceeds laboratory mea- <br />surements. In particular they suggest that contact nu- <br />cleation is not the primary mode of nucleation. If the <br />above calculation is repeated, including a scavenging <br />rate for the ice nuclei (Slinn 1971), the prediction is <br />an ice crystal concentration of 5 L -1 after 90 min. <br />Based on these observations, AgI is active at tem- <br />peratures> -lOoC, which is necessary for seeding in <br />the Sierra Nevada, and has several advantages over <br />CO2. For CO2, liquid water is necessary at the time of <br />seeding and all nucleation occurs instantaneously; for <br />AgI, this is not the case. Seeding could even be done <br />upwind of cloud to allow more time for the material <br />to disperse, before the AgI nuclei encounter liquid water <br />and become active (Hill 1980). Also, with AgI, nucle- <br />ation will be spread out over a longer time, thus perhaps <br />making better use of the liquid water available. <br /> <br />Acknowledgments. This research was sponsored by <br />the Bureau of Reclamation, U.S. Department of the <br />Interior. The support of all Sierra Cooperative Pilot <br />Project personnel is appreciated. Particular thanks to <br />the crew of the research aircraft, Dr. J. D. Marwitz, <br />Mr. G. V. Bershinsky, and Mr. G. L. Gordon for the <br />scientific and technical expertise to capitalize on this <br />experiment. <br /> <br />REFERENCES <br /> <br />Brown, K. J., R. D. Elliott and M. W. Edelstein, 1978: Transactions <br />of workshop on total area effects of weather modification, NSF <br />report under Contract ENV-77.15028. Available from North <br />American Weather Consultants, 3761 South 700 East, Salt Lake <br />City, UT 84106. <br />Cooper, W. A., and R. P. Lawson, 1984: Physical interpretation of <br />results from the HIPLEX-I experiment. J. Climate Appl. Me. <br />teor., 23, 523-540. <br />-, W. R. Sand, M. K. Politovich and D. L. Veal, 1984: Effects of <br />icing on performance of a research aircraft. J. Aircraft, 21,708- <br />715. <br />DeMott, p, J., W. G, Finnegan and L. O. Grant, 1983: An application <br />of chemical kinetic theory and methodology to characterize the <br />ice nucleating properties of aerosols used for weather modifi. <br />cation. J. Climate Appl. Meteor., 22, 1190-1203, <br />Deshler, T" 0, W. Reynolds and A. W. Huggins, 1990: Physical <br />response of winter orographic clouds over the Sierra Nevada to <br />airborne seeding using dry ice or silver iodide. J. Appl. Meteor., <br />29, 288-330. <br />Finnegan, W. G., and R. L. Pitter, 1987: Rapid ice nucleation by <br />acetone-silver iodide generator aerosols. J. Wea. Mod., 20, <br />51-53. <br />Gordon, G. L., and J. D. Marwitz, 1986: APIPS testing using a tracer. <br />Pre prints, Tenth Conference on Weather Modification, Wash. <br />ington, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 61-63. <br />Heggli, M. F., and R. M. Rauber, 1988: The characteristics and evo. <br />lution of supercooled water in wintertime storms over the Sierra <br />Nevada: A summary of microwave radiometric measurements <br />taken during the Sierra Cooperative Pilot Project. J. Appl. Me- <br />teor., 27,989-1015. <br />Heymsfield, A, J., 1986: Aggregates as embryos in seeded clouds. <br />Precipitation Enhancement-A Scientific Challenge, R. R. <br />Brahm, Jr., Ed" Meteor, Monog" 21, 33-41. <br />Hill, G. E., 1980: Dispersion of airborne-released silver iodide in <br />winter orographic clouds. J. Appl. Meteor., 19,978-985. <br />