<br />JUNE 1990
<br />
<br />TERRY DESHLER AND DAVID W. REYNOLDS
<br />
<br />487
<br />
<br />ing would have been below the altitude of the research
<br />aircraft before natural particle concentrations had de-
<br />creased to a level where the seeding effects could have
<br />been observed. Also, CO2 may have been ineffective
<br />on this day considering the low liquid-water content
<br />observed at the seedline.
<br />No effects from seeding were observed with radar;
<br />however, considering the intensity of natural echo, rel-
<br />ative to echoes anticipated from seeding (Deshler et
<br />al. 1990), no radar seeding effects were anticipated.
<br />Similarly no seeding effects were observed with the
<br />surface instrumentation; however, the resolution of the
<br />precipitation gauges was above what may be expected
<br />from the passage of one seedline, and the seedline did
<br />not pass over the heavily instrumented surface station.
<br />The final penetration of the seedline, 10 km from
<br />the downwind edge of cloud, Fig. 4b, still showed a
<br />significant concentration of ice nuclei, suggesting that
<br />seeding effects would be limited by the dimensions of
<br />the cloud and not by the amount of seeding material
<br />released. The unscavenged nuclei at the downwind edge
<br />of cloud will pass over the barrier. If they enter another
<br />cloud system they could be expected to contribute to
<br />the ice formation process in that cloud. Thus, these
<br />measurements lend credence to predictions of extra
<br />area effects from seeding with AgI (Brown et al. 1978).
<br />Although the goal of documenting ice crystal nucle-
<br />ation at -60C with AgI NH41 NH4Cl04 was not met,
<br />this case presents an outstanding example ofthe ability
<br />to track seeding material for a long period of time. It
<br />also suggests that AgI NH41 NH4Cl04 is an effective
<br />cloud seeding agent with properties in the field that
<br />meet or exceed those measured in the laboratory. Using
<br />the width of the ice crystal plume on the last penetration
<br />(7 km), the length of the seedline (40 km), and as-
<br />suming the ice crystal curtain reached the surface 2.5
<br />km below, the volume of cloud affected by seeding can
<br />be roughly calculated. The result is 7 X 10 14 L. Sixteen
<br />grams of AgI were released, which according to DeMott
<br />et al. ( 1983) would give approximately 1016 nuclei ac-
<br />tive at -lOoC, assuming all ice nuclei have activated.
<br />This amounts to an ice particle concentration of 14
<br />L -1 from seeding in agreement with measurements at
<br />92 min that show 10-20 L -1 in the seeded curtain.
<br />DeMott et al.'s measurements indicate that all ice nuclei
<br />in the cloud chamber activate within 20-30 min, while
<br />these field measurements indicate approximately 10%
<br />of the ice nuclei still available after 90 min. Given the
<br />1-10% counting efficiency of the ice nucleus counter,
<br />the 30 L -1 shown in Fig. 4 may represent a relatively
<br />high concentration of ice nuclei. This difference in ice
<br />nucleus scavenging rate could be attributed to the lower
<br />droplet concentration in the natural cloud compared
<br />to the cloud chamber where droplet concentrations are
<br />higher by a factor of 100. The collection rate in the
<br />cloud chamber would be significantly faster because of
<br />the high droplet concentration. Considering the ice
<br />crystal concentrations observed and the ice nuclei still
<br />
<br />available these observations indicate that the activity
<br />of this AgI mixture meets or exceeds laboratory mea-
<br />surements. In particular they suggest that contact nu-
<br />cleation is not the primary mode of nucleation. If the
<br />above calculation is repeated, including a scavenging
<br />rate for the ice nuclei (Slinn 1971), the prediction is
<br />an ice crystal concentration of 5 L -1 after 90 min.
<br />Based on these observations, AgI is active at tem-
<br />peratures> -lOoC, which is necessary for seeding in
<br />the Sierra Nevada, and has several advantages over
<br />CO2. For CO2, liquid water is necessary at the time of
<br />seeding and all nucleation occurs instantaneously; for
<br />AgI, this is not the case. Seeding could even be done
<br />upwind of cloud to allow more time for the material
<br />to disperse, before the AgI nuclei encounter liquid water
<br />and become active (Hill 1980). Also, with AgI, nucle-
<br />ation will be spread out over a longer time, thus perhaps
<br />making better use of the liquid water available.
<br />
<br />Acknowledgments. This research was sponsored by
<br />the Bureau of Reclamation, U.S. Department of the
<br />Interior. The support of all Sierra Cooperative Pilot
<br />Project personnel is appreciated. Particular thanks to
<br />the crew of the research aircraft, Dr. J. D. Marwitz,
<br />Mr. G. V. Bershinsky, and Mr. G. L. Gordon for the
<br />scientific and technical expertise to capitalize on this
<br />experiment.
<br />
<br />REFERENCES
<br />
<br />Brown, K. J., R. D. Elliott and M. W. Edelstein, 1978: Transactions
<br />of workshop on total area effects of weather modification, NSF
<br />report under Contract ENV-77.15028. Available from North
<br />American Weather Consultants, 3761 South 700 East, Salt Lake
<br />City, UT 84106.
<br />Cooper, W. A., and R. P. Lawson, 1984: Physical interpretation of
<br />results from the HIPLEX-I experiment. J. Climate Appl. Me.
<br />teor., 23, 523-540.
<br />-, W. R. Sand, M. K. Politovich and D. L. Veal, 1984: Effects of
<br />icing on performance of a research aircraft. J. Aircraft, 21,708-
<br />715.
<br />DeMott, p, J., W. G, Finnegan and L. O. Grant, 1983: An application
<br />of chemical kinetic theory and methodology to characterize the
<br />ice nucleating properties of aerosols used for weather modifi.
<br />cation. J. Climate Appl. Meteor., 22, 1190-1203,
<br />Deshler, T" 0, W. Reynolds and A. W. Huggins, 1990: Physical
<br />response of winter orographic clouds over the Sierra Nevada to
<br />airborne seeding using dry ice or silver iodide. J. Appl. Meteor.,
<br />29, 288-330.
<br />Finnegan, W. G., and R. L. Pitter, 1987: Rapid ice nucleation by
<br />acetone-silver iodide generator aerosols. J. Wea. Mod., 20,
<br />51-53.
<br />Gordon, G. L., and J. D. Marwitz, 1986: APIPS testing using a tracer.
<br />Pre prints, Tenth Conference on Weather Modification, Wash.
<br />ington, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 61-63.
<br />Heggli, M. F., and R. M. Rauber, 1988: The characteristics and evo.
<br />lution of supercooled water in wintertime storms over the Sierra
<br />Nevada: A summary of microwave radiometric measurements
<br />taken during the Sierra Cooperative Pilot Project. J. Appl. Me-
<br />teor., 27,989-1015.
<br />Heymsfield, A, J., 1986: Aggregates as embryos in seeded clouds.
<br />Precipitation Enhancement-A Scientific Challenge, R. R.
<br />Brahm, Jr., Ed" Meteor, Monog" 21, 33-41.
<br />Hill, G. E., 1980: Dispersion of airborne-released silver iodide in
<br />winter orographic clouds. J. Appl. Meteor., 19,978-985.
<br />
|