Laserfiche WebLink
<br />GRAM <br /> <br />V. ANALYSIS <br /> <br />.h. <br /> <br /> <br />r. <br /> <br /> <br />, \ <br />.\ : <br /> <br />/ <br /> <br />/ <br /> <br />~ PRtQICT~D <br /> <br />_ MEASURED .......-...--.. Ale TRAeKS <br /> <br />igure 43a.-Plume Dimensions and Pibal (pilot Ballon) <br />Soundings for 2 February 1965. <br /> <br />'elease <br /> <br />te the <br />on the <br />,ienta- <br />lepeat <br />.itions <br /> <br />within about one-half hour after initial tracer dis- <br />persing. The mean direction of the plume is closely <br />related to the 11,000 feet ASL (above sea level) <br />wind direction and its propagation speed to the <br />wind speed at that altitude. The plume dimensions <br />and direction have little relationship to the wind <br />measured at the Emerald Mountain dispensing site. <br />The parameter (FO V-where (FO is standard devia- <br />tion of the lateral wind direction and V the mean <br />wind speed-as measured on Emerald Mountain, <br />appears to indicate the relative growth of the plume <br />with time, but its use in conventional plume predic- <br />tion models does not lead to usable results. The <br />vertical dimension of the plume is difficult to meas- <br />ure under quasi-operational conditions because of <br />restricted VFR airspace and rapid mixing of the <br />plume by convective action. The values of the (Fe U <br />value for each diffusion test are given in table 5; <br />equivalent values for each analysis period are also <br />listed. It appears that a value of (Fe U >0.5 assures <br />adequate dispersion of the plume. <br />Snow samples taken after the 25 March and 8 <br /> <br />nboat <br />1965. <br />:le de- <br /> <br />.lotted <br />:,43d, <br />March <br />'ly op- <br />ced a <br />:adian <br /> <br />33 <br /> <br />April 1965 tests reveal high concentrations of <br />tracer material on the ground beneath the plume. <br />The concentrations are often 1,000 times greater <br />than the minimum detectable by the laboratory <br />ZnS analyzer, figure 44. <br />Diffusion tests on 2 February, 3 February, 18 <br />February and II March 1965 were conducted under <br />stable to very stable conditions-not operational <br />nucleating conditions. The detected plumes behave <br />much as predicted by theoretical models-narrow <br />both laterally and vertically. <br />Conclusion.-Under even light convective condi- <br />tions, artificial nuclei dispersed from Emerald <br />Mountain will reach and cover the target area in <br />high concentration if the 11,000 feet ASL wind is <br />between 2400 and 3000 true. Since the majority <br />of the Phase I winter-spring storms had associated <br />with them such winds, figure 45, and these storms <br />produced most of the precipitation, figure 46, most <br />of the important storms over the target area can <br />be nucleated artificially from Emerald Mountain. <br />Operational Consequence.--A single nucleating <br /> <br /> <br />10 IN R. <br /> <br /> <br />\ <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />... <br /> <br />.- "00' <br />c- .aoo' <br />G- 'IiQO' <br /> <br /> <br />~. <br /> <br />.I <br /> <br />'1 <br />II <br />"i <br />\.11 <br />p! <br /> <br />ill <br />II <br />I! <br />III <br />,Ii <br />i <br />\~ <br />II. <br />"I <br /> <br />:k~; <br /> <br />I' <br /> <br />/ <br />/ <br />/ <br /> <br />OAK CREEk <br /> <br />~ PAEDICT[O <br /> <br />IR!iiiIII MEASUREO t-----f 'Ale TRACKS <br /> <br />Figure 43b.-Plume Dimensions and Pibal Soundings for 3 <br />February 1965. <br /> <br />