Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />t <br /> <br />3.3 Snow Spatial Variation <br /> <br />~ <br />~ <br /> <br />An analysis of the' climate station data was conducted <br />to examine the gross spatial characteristics of the <br />regional snowfall. The sparse measurement network <br />and complex terrain makes any data interpolation be- <br />tween points questionable but some patterns may be <br />apparent. Figure 11 shows the computer-contoured <br />average annual snowfall in the project region. This <br />contouring includes prairie stations and is based on a <br />one-pass weighted-average data smoothing. <br /> <br />The map shows that maximum snowfall amounts <br />occur over the mountain regions, as expected. A fairly <br />steep gradient over the drier Columbia river valley is <br />indicated. Snowfall amounts gradually decrease across <br />the Alberta foothills and into the lower prairie regions. <br />The effect of the limited and irregular network is sug- <br />gested by the apparent lower values over the divide <br />southwest of Banff. This feature may be due more to <br />network sparseness rather than any real precipitation <br />patterns. <br /> <br />The variability of snowfall frequency is indicated by <br />the annual number snowfall days (Fig. 12). Two data- <br />smoothings were performed to minimize the significant <br />variability of this data. A maximum frequency over the <br />higher mountain regions is indicated. The complex pat- <br />tern suggests a general tendency for the number of <br />snowfall days to decrease eastwards across the <br />prairies. <br /> <br />The high correlation of snowfall amount with site <br />elevation may mask other factors influencing snow <br />distribution. The previously noted snow-elevation <br />regression model approach was used to "subtract" the <br />elevation influence from the annual station values. <br />Elevation-predicted annual snowfall amounts were <br />determined for each station and the ratio of the actual <br />to predicted values calculated. The contour plotting of <br />these actual/predicted ratios is illustrated in Figure 13 <br />(two smoothings). The plotted ratio can be used to sug- <br />gest whether other factors may be responsible for <br />snowfall variation. Values in excess of one indicate <br />larger than expected snowfall values. Conversely, <br />values less than one suggest less than expected <br />snowfall values. <br /> <br />A general trend of underestimation towards the <br /> <br />southwest and overestimation in the northeast is sug- <br />gested. The excessive values for the southern part of <br />the region may reflect the area's closer proximity to <br />maritime moisture sources. The lower-than-expected <br />values for the north may indicate dryelr continental <br />climate patterns. <br /> <br />4.0 CONCLUSION <br /> <br />This brief preliminary analysis has outlined some of <br />the general characteristics of the snow climate of the <br />southern Canadian Rockies. The seasonal strong <br />season character of snowfall with a mid-winter peak has <br />been indicated. The maximum snowpack depth in late <br />spring, and subsequent rapid melt, has also been <br />delineated. A strong correlation with site elevation pro- <br />vided equations for predicting snowfall and average <br />snowpack water equivalent. The spatial distribution of <br />snowfall has been shown to be quite varia.ble with max- <br />imum values being indicated along the higher <br />elevations. <br /> <br />These results give a preliminary oVElrview of the <br />snowfall climate of the snowpack stud~' region. The <br />temporal trend of snowfall and snowpack water <br />equivalent suggests that a substantial contribution is <br />made during the late winter and spring. The spring <br />"seeding window" (Renick et aI, 1979) may then oc- <br />cur during this period of substantial natural precipita- <br />tion. This suggests that a potential for snowpack <br />augmentation within the study area may occur during <br />the spring months. <br /> <br />The study has also indicated the difficulty of assess- <br />ing the snow climate due to the sparse network and <br />limited snow survey record length. The importance of <br />site elevation is also indicated. Based on these <br />preliminary results, a measurement network for the <br />region cannot be confidently specified. <br /> <br />A more detailed analysis of the precipitation data <br />would provide a more confident climate assessment. <br />Examination of daily records from the climate network <br />would assist in this by identifying individual precipite- <br />tion events. A time series analysis of the data may <br />delineate any trends in the snow data. Finally, a cloud <br />climatology of the region would provide relevant infor- <br />mation on. the snow-producing clouds of the region. <br /> <br />5 <br />