My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WMOD00500
CWCB
>
Weather Modification
>
DayForward
>
WMOD00500
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/28/2009 2:40:19 PM
Creation date
4/24/2008 2:48:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Weather Modification
Title
Observations of Silver Iodide Plumes over the Grand Mesa of Colorado
Date
10/10/1988
State
CO
Weather Modification - Doc Type
Report
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />1126 <br /> <br />JOURNAL OF APPLIED METEOROLOGY <br /> <br />VOLUME 27 <br /> <br />dataset. Application of the GUIDE model (Elliott et <br />al. 1983), with local upwind soundings as input, re- <br />sulted in the conclusion that "only 36% ofthe sound- <br />ings considered showed seeding material was delivered <br />to the clouds." In the majority of cases, intended trans- <br />port was apparently not achieved, due to easterly <br />downslope flow, trapping inversions, or air flow parallel <br />to the mountains. <br />A common element in all ofthese programs was the <br />use of ground-based seeding generators located at low <br />altitudes. In contrast, seeding sites for the Bridger Range <br />Experiment (BRE) were selected to avoid trapping <br />problems by placing ground generators more than <br />midway up the windward slope of the barrier (Super <br />and Heimbach 1983). Tracing experiments performed <br />during this program showed that the AgI seeding ma- <br />terial was routinely transported up and over the oro- <br />graphic barrier (Super 1974). Recent physical studies <br />conducted over the BRE target area have confirmed <br />that the artificial IN can be routinely transported over <br />the target during storms and in sufficient quantities to <br />induce observable microphysical effects (Super and <br />Heimbach 1988). The positive targeting results from <br />this program strongly emphasize the need for careful <br />investigation of ground generator siting prior to initi- <br />ation of any seeding program using this mode of IN <br />delivery. <br />Obviously, alternatives to ground generators exist <br />for seeding. Principal among them is the use of aircraft <br />to dispense AgI smoke at an appropriate altitude and <br />upwind distance from the target clouds, although use <br />of this technique involves other logistic considerations <br />and higher costs. In addition, the potential problem of <br />low diffusion rates in the free atmosphere has recently <br />been documented. Karacostas (1981) reported on the <br />results of two experiments during light turbulence in <br />stratiform clouds. A Particle Measuring Systems <br />2D-C optical array probe was used to determine the <br />along-the-wind horizontal spreading rate of ice particles <br />resulting from both aerial AgI and dry ice seeding. The <br />median value of the 11 observational points given was <br />1.7 m S-I, with a range from 1.4 to 2.1 m S-I, consid- <br />ering both upwind and downwind plume edges. Times <br />from seeding to observation ranged from about 230 to <br />3500 s. Hill (1980) used a National Center for At- <br />mospheric Research (NCAR) acoustical ice nucleus <br />counter (Langer 1973) to monitor along-the-wind <br />spreading of AgI lines released by aircraft. The 11 mea- <br />surements made in winter orographic clouds had a <br />median value of 0.8 m S-1 over a range of 0 to 4.2 m <br />s -1 . Times ,from release ranged from 1200 to 6600 s. <br />The relatively low median value and wide range of <br />spreading rates may be partially due to scavenging <br />losses in the clouds and to additional problems asso- <br />ciated with using an NCAR acoustical ice nucleus <br />counter to determine AgI plume edges in cloud. These <br />problems are discussed later in this paper (sec. 3.b) and <br />in Super et al. (1988). <br /> <br />Ideally, airborne seeding should be conducted suf- <br />ficiently far upwind so that individual lines of material <br />will merge prior to reaching the target clouds. However, <br />at the low rates cited, frequent repetitions along a fixed <br />upwind line are necessary to achieve plume mergers, <br />which necessitates the use of multiple aircraft operating <br />simultaneously to treat anything other than a small <br />target area effectively. Additionally, Hill (1980) ob- <br />served a vertical diffusion rate of less than 0.1 m s -I , <br />indicating that only a small vertical extent of the cloud <br />is likely to be treated in the absence of convection. <br />The transport and dispersion of cloud seeding ma- <br />terials in winter orographic cloud systems is an example <br />of dispersion in complex terrain. A considerable <br />amount of work on the latter topic is currently being <br />done, as summarized by Egan and Schiermeier (1986). <br />One of the goals of this research is to identify a critical <br />height above which the air will flow over a terrain ob- <br />stacle rather than around it. The critical height for any <br />given topography will vary with the vertical profiles of <br />stability and wind speed and direction; it can therefore <br />change throughout a day. This has direct bearing on <br />the altitude selected for ground-based generators. First- <br />order effects of terrain on altering flows are achievable <br />with current models and can serve as a guide to the <br />behavior of seeding plumes over a numerical simpli- <br />fication of complex terrain. But it appears that there <br />may be a limit to the guidance coming from the im- <br />proved models of the future. If the models become <br />good enough to describe flows over real terrain accu- <br />rately, it is likely that they may not be able to be prop- <br />erly initialized with real three-dimensional observations <br />of the wind and temperature fields at a sufficient num- <br />ber of points. In view of the turbulent nature of the <br />atmosphere on many scales, the end result of the re- <br />search on transport and dispersion in complex terrain <br />may only be generalized flow fields with a statistical <br />description of the plume characteristics. The use of <br />scatter diagrams in the field results described below <br />may therefore be an appropriate presentation. <br /> <br />2. The Grand Mesa experiments <br /> <br />One of the major objectives of the 1985-86 Colo- <br />rado River Augmentation Demonstration Program <br />(CRADP) field effort was transport and dispersion in- <br />vestigations. A series of experiments was conducted <br />around the Grand Mesa area of west-central Colorado <br />during February and March 1986. <br />Investigations were made using both ground and <br />airborne AgI releases, while tracing was accomplished <br />using an instrumented aircraft. Flight measurements <br />were made during both Visual Flight Rules (VFR) and <br />Instrument Flight Rules (IFR) conditions. The primary <br />objective of the experiments was to improve knowledge <br />in the following areas: <br /> <br />1. The minimum elevation (if any) at which upwind <br />ground generators can be placed for AgI smoke to be <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.