Laserfiche WebLink
<br />OCTOBER 1988 <br /> <br />HOLROYD, McPARTLAND AND SUPER <br /> <br /> <br />I <br />,. <br /> <br /> x <br /> all in <br /> ice <br />U; plume <br />E :+ <br /> ~ <br />E . <br />~ \ <br /> . <br />w . <br />Q ~+ <br />::;) <br />!:: <br />~ crest <br />c x <br /> 3 <br /> x <br /> 10 100 1000 <br /> Total ice nuclei per pass <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />FIG, 5, The average vertical distribution of total ice nuclei counted <br />for each pass near the crest. <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />ticle plumes were averaged over the same partitions as <br />in Table 2. The results are not presented because the <br />various regions of the table were dominated by the data <br />of particular dates. All the data from the seeding site <br />were from 2 to 16 km (rather than 14 km as above). <br />They were combined into the "ice" column in Table <br />3 and plotted in Fig. 6 to represent a vertical profile of <br />ice particle concentrations. The concentrations were <br />generally greater at the higher altitudes, probably as a <br />result of both the greater effectiveness of the nuclei at <br />colder temperatures and the decreasing concentrations <br />at lower altitudes as the ice particles settled and evap- <br />orated. The bottom of the profile was dominated by <br />the experiments of 20 March, in which the effects of <br />evaporation on snow showers were visible in the pho- <br />tographs of the clouds as well as in the ice particle <br />measurements. <br />The regression line [Eq. (1)] fitting the right column <br />of Table 2 and plotted in Fig. 5 was used to estimate <br />IN concentrations for comparison with the ice particle <br />concentrations in Fig. 6. The total IN per pass, C, as <br />measured at - 20oC, was assumed to be sampled within <br />a 150 wedge over a crest approximately 7 km down- <br />wind of the seeding site. The aircraft would pass per- <br />pendicularly through the plume there at about 95 m <br />s -I in a time, t, of almost 20 s. The air was sampled <br />at a rate, r, of 10 L min -I , giving a sample volume of <br />rt. The counter operated with a loss ofIN to the walls <br />assumed to be a factor of 10 (Langer 1973). The es- <br />timated IN concentrations, N, are given by N = IOC j <br />rt and are listed in the - 200C column of Table 3 for <br />each 0.2 km layer. <br />Garvey (1975) gives data on the AgI effectiveness, <br />E, at various temperatures, T. The concentration of <br /> <br />1139 <br /> <br />* Than typical temp, <br /> <br />nuclei effective at other temperatures is N. E( T)j E <br />(-200C). Several winter months of microwave radi- <br />ometer and surface temperature measurements have <br />revealed a typical crest temperature of about -70C <br />during liquid water episodes (Boe and Super 1986). <br />An approximate moist adiabatic temperature profile <br />for these typical conditions is listed in the far right <br />column of Table 3. The values ofN were converted to <br />the typical temperature profile and to profiles 30C <br />warmer and colder for the remaining columns of Table <br />3. This presumes that the NCAR acoustical counter <br />observations are similar to AgI activation in natural <br /> <br />u; <br />E <br />E <br />~ <br /> <br /> <br />I', <br />-'b'( 1 , <br />'ft.'(~'" ~ <br />a\ '3o~ \', <br />--... / \ <br />-- / <br />II of\.'~. \"'_./ \ <br />.S aG'\.\ -- 1 <br />-- <br />+ 1 <br />".'" <br />o\~.~ ". <br />rest a\ '3 o~ <1- - <br />-- <br />-- <br />- <br /> <br />W <br />Q <br />::;) <br />~ <br />~ <br />c( <br /> <br />3 <br /> <br /> <br />10 100 <br />Ice nucleus and particle <br />concentration L-1 <br /> <br />FIG, 6. The vertical distributions of average ice particle concen- <br />trations resulting from ground-released AgI smoke, and the distri- <br />butions of ice nucleus concentrations effective at three typical tem- <br />perature profiles, <br />