My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WMOD00493
CWCB
>
Weather Modification
>
DayForward
>
WMOD00493
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/28/2009 2:40:13 PM
Creation date
4/23/2008 1:58:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Weather Modification
Title
Nested Model Simulations of Regional Orographic Preocipitation
Date
1/17/1993
Weather Modification - Doc Type
Report
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />260-km domain. Small dots show each MM4 grid point and <br />large dots indicate the CCM (Community Climate Model) R- <br />15 (rhomboidal spherical harmonic truncation at wave <br />number 15) 500-km resolution grid points. 1be CCM has <br />been used widely by modelers to examine the effects of <br />doubled C02 on global climate (Washington and Meehl, <br />1984). Clearly, nested regional and local-scale models are <br />required to examine precipitation processes at the watershed <br />leveL <br /> <br />a <br /> <br />AT p. 1'00.000 Of( &3OTZOOQ. i883 lilt. <br /> <br /> <br />b ~4H pcp AT S- 1000 ON ft,.W720 (CtnJ <br /> <br /> <br />Figure 1. Monsoon flow and precipitation over the West. <br />MM4 simulations of the monsoOIi flow at 700 mb on July <br />20, 1983, at 0000 UTC (figure la). Vectors indicate airflow <br />with moisture sources in the Gulf of Mexico and Pacific <br />marked by bold arrows. MM4 grid points are marked by <br />small dots and wind vectors are plotted at every 3 cd point. <br />Large dots ( .) show the very coarse resolution of the general <br />circulation model grid with - 500- km resolution. The <br />nested Clark model domains for 10-km (solid bold square) <br />and 5-km resolution (dashed square) are marked over the <br />Gunnison Basin. Precipitation predicted by MM4 from <br />1200 UTC on July 19 to 1200 UTC July 20, 1983, shows a <br />5.25-cm maximum over Colorado (figure Ib). <br /> <br />Reclamation is using two models to simulate local <br /> <br />orographic precipitation: Rhea and Clark models. Medina <br />(1992) has adapted the steady-state Rhea model (Rhea; 1977) <br />to simulate local precipitation over the Gunnison River <br />Basin in Colomdo aud has adapted the model to use initial <br />conditions from soundings derived from MM4. This <br />approximates a one-way, local-scale nesting. Comparisons <br />between Rhea modE:I simulations from mwinsondes and <br />MM4-derived soundings are encouraging; however, <br />convective precipitatilon is not accurately simulated in either <br />the MM4 or Rhea models. <br /> <br />Therefore, we are also using the more sophisticated, <br />three-dimensional, time-dependent, local-scale Clark model <br />to simulate the local evolution of convective clouds and <br />precipitation over complex terrain in the central Colomdo <br />Rockies. The Clark model is used extensively throughout <br />the research community to simulate phenomena ranging <br />from airflow over complex terrain to deep convection (Clarlc, <br />1979). The model is an anelastic, finite difference model <br />with one- and two-wny intemctive nesting described by Clark <br />(1977), and Clarlc and Hall (1991). The Clark model will be <br />used to understand the complex three-dimensional airflow <br />and evolution of clouds and precipitation in a limited sample <br />of cases. It will contribute to better parameterizations of <br />airflow structure for lthe Rhea model, which may be roo on a <br />large number of casE:S. Initial Clark model simulations are <br />examining model sensitivity to initial conditions and <br />increased resolution .of complex terrain in western Colorado <br />using mwinsondes aud MM4 soundings. <br /> <br />3. INITIALIZATION AND ASSESSMENT OF <br />MODEL SIMULATIONS <br /> <br />Giorgi and Bates (1989) began a validation of the <br />CCM-MM4 nested modeling approach using observations <br />for 40 months from January 1982 to December 1,983, and <br />January 1988 to April 1989. They used initial conditions <br />from ECMWF (European Center for Medium-range Weather <br />Forecasts) analyses of observed data gridded to a spatial <br />resolution of 2.8 by 2.80 and having temporal resolution of <br />12 h. MM4's lateral boundary conditions were adjusted <br />every 12 h using the ECMWF gridded data. These initial <br />conditions were located at grid points that matched the CCM <br />T-42 (triangular spherical harmonic truncation at wave <br />number 42) used in climate simulations. <br /> <br />Giorgi et al. (1992a) have validated mean monthly <br />precipitation predict1ed by the MM4 model during the 1982- <br />83 and 1988-89 peliods. They found that the correlation <br />coefficient between observed and modeled monthly <br />precipitation varied from 0.53 to 0.94 among each of six <br />subregions of the Western United States. Over the Central <br />Rocky Mountains, cold season precipitation was reasonably <br />well simulated with a bias of 40%, however, the wann <br />season bias was 157% in the base runs. The revised <br />horizontal diffusion method lowered this bias to 39% in the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.