<br />"
<br />
<br />.
<br />
<br />A Mul ti sensor" Three-Dimensional Analysis
<br />of a ME!so-High's Development
<br />
<br />e
<br />
<br />by
<br />
<br />John C. Lease
<br />
<br />and
<br />
<br />David A. Matthews
<br />Bureau of Reclamation
<br />Denver, Colorado
<br />
<br />1. INTRODUCTION
<br />
<br />Mesoscale triggering mechanisms are ve~ important
<br />to the initiation of organized convective cloud
<br />development, locally heavy precipitation, and
<br />severe weather events. One type of mesocale
<br />triggering mechanism is the mesoscale cold front
<br />associated with the meso~high created by moist
<br />downdrafts from decaying thunderstorms (Fujita,
<br />1956). The meso-cold front is often delineated by
<br />an "arc cloud" in satellite image~. The intersec-
<br />tion of two arc clouds has been associated with
<br />severe weather and triggering of convection (Oliver
<br />and Purdom, 1974).
<br />
<br />e
<br />
<br />In the central and southern High Plains, arc clouds
<br />appear to be an important mechanism for organizing
<br />convection and producing large meso-scale systems
<br />(Matthews and Koshio, 1977). Detailed analysis of
<br />mesoscale surface observations by Maddox showed
<br />that a meso-high was associated with the Johnstown
<br />Flood in 1977 (Maddox and Chappell, 1978). Meso-
<br />high arc clouds may also be important in promoting
<br />cloud mergers, and recent results from the Florida
<br />Area Cumulus Experiment (Simpson and Woodley, 1975,
<br />and Cunning et al., 1977) suggest that total rain-
<br />fall from large mesoscale systems resulting from
<br />cloud mergers may be from one to two orders of
<br />magnitude greater than that from single isolated
<br />convective clouds or thunderstorms.
<br />
<br />On August 19, 1977, near the Goodland, Kansas, High
<br />Plains Cooperative Program (HIPLEX) field site, we
<br />had an opportunity to make multisensor observations
<br />of a meso-high arc cloud. This paper discusses the
<br />results of the multisensor (satellite, radar, air-
<br />craft, rawinsonde, and numerical model) analysis
<br />of this arc cloud. The structure, strength, and
<br />effect of mesoscale triggering on the release of
<br />available potential instability are presented.
<br />
<br />2. SATELLITE AND RADAR OBSERVATIONS
<br />
<br />e
<br />
<br />A mesoscale cluster of cumulonimbus clouds 45 km
<br />wide developed on August 19, 1977, at 1900 G.m.t.
<br />125 km northeast of Goodland, Kansas. This cluster
<br />produced a distinct meso-high arc cloud in a field
<br />of cumulus clouds at 2030 G.m.t. In regions were
<br />sufficient instability and moisture exist, a series
<br />of clouds will form along the leading edge of this
<br />meso-scale cold front. These clouds will be seen
<br />on satellite imagery as a distincit arc. The arc
<br />generally moves radially outward from the gener-
<br />ating cumulonimbus clouds.
<br />
<br />The arc cloud moved southwestward from the cloud
<br />cluster with a mean speed of 7 ms-1, while the
<br />cloud cluster moved southward at 6 ms-1. This
<br />relatively weak arc cloud had a cord length of
<br />nearly 95 km and duration of more than 4 h
<br />
<br />i
<br />(see figure 1). Note the clear ~egiOn behind the
<br />arc cloud associated with the cold, moist, stable
<br />air produced by the thunderstorm downdraft and
<br />local cloud-environment compensating subsidence.
<br />Several large cumulus congestus S'ouds developed
<br />along the arc; however, the dry subsidence'
<br />associ ated wi th the synopti c-sca l:e hi gh pressure
<br />in Nebraska suppressed further development of
<br />clouds along the arc.
<br />
<br />The formation and development of ithe meso-high and
<br />its associated arc cloud was also: observed with t.he
<br />Bureau of Reclamation's 5.4-cm (C~Band) radar.
<br />Thi s radar is located at Goodl and" and is operated
<br />conti nuously whenever there are clouds wi thi nits
<br />150-km range. It normally operat:es in a volume-
<br />scan mode, which consists of one 13600 azimuth rot.a-
<br />tion for each 10 elevation angle between 1 and 120.
<br />In this mode, the first 3600 scan~ requires 34 s
<br />and the remaining scans require 1;7 s each, with the
<br />entire volume scan completed in 51 min. On this
<br />date radar data were recorded continuously through-
<br />out the life of the meso-high. :
<br />I
<br />I
<br />The cumulonimbus cloud cluster whiich produced the
<br />meso-high is clearly visible in f~gure (1). As the
<br />arc cloud moved southwestward, the mesco-cold front
<br />and the associated cells which de~eloped along it
<br />were readily discernible on the raw video display
<br />and were recorded as digital datal for later analysis
<br />(fi gure 2). The average speed ofl the front was
<br />6-7 ms-1 toward the southwest. .
<br />
<br />3. AIRCRAFT OBSERVATIONS
<br />
<br />I
<br />Two aircraft extensively instrumerted for cloud
<br />phsics measurements operated fromiGoodland in
<br />support of the HIPLEX program. Measurements of the
<br />basic state parameters, turbulence, vertical
<br />velocity, doppler winds, and liqujd-water content
<br />were recorded at 1-s intervals. In addition of
<br />the spectra and concentrations oflaerosol, cloud,
<br />and precipitation particles were recorded at
<br />1-s intervals. I
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />To investigate the structure of the arc, rada."
<br />information was used to establishlfli9ht patterns
<br />that would result in penetrations made perpendicu-
<br />1 ar to the front. The ai rcraft f'l ew at 160 and
<br />320 m above ground level, with th~ lower airCl"aft
<br />(Meteorology Research, Inc., Navajo) approximately
<br />1 km behind the upper aircraft (Upiversity of
<br />Wyoming, Queen Air). This resulbed in a time
<br />separation of approximately 12-15: s. Figures 3
<br />shows data for two passes through: the arc for
<br />each ai rcraft. In these fi gures 'the ai rcraft fl ew
<br />out of the meso-high, turned arou~d, and reentered
<br />it. The data as presented have been binomially
<br />averaged over a period which is lhnger than the
<br />response time of any of the instrlJmentation.
<br />
|