Laserfiche WebLink
<br />SEPTEMBER 1996 <br /> <br />REYNOLDS <br /> <br />1445 <br /> <br /> 5000 <br /> 4500 td <br /> ttl <br /> 4000 <br /> 3500 <br />g 1 <br />E <br />Ol 3000 TT . <br />.0; t <br />:r: l ACFT <br /> 2500 I! . <br /> ~ ACFT <br /> 2000 t <br /> 1500 t 1 m/s JVL: <br /> 1000 <br /> .10000 -5000 0 5000 10000 15000 <br /> Distance from JVL (m) <br /> <br /> <br />FIG. 13. Rawinsonde-derived vertical velocities for 17 March, <br />showing a well-defined lee-wave pattern that influenced the transport <br />of SF6 on this day. Locations of aircraft sampling altitudes over the <br />valley and ridge passes are annotated. <br /> <br />sampling port of the aircraft and the registration of SF6 <br />on the analyzer. This was accounted for in the analysis <br />of these data but is not in the figures of SF6 plumes <br />shown in this paper. Plume intercept times were com- <br />piled and identified for whether the plume originated <br />from site 7 or 9 if simultaneous releases were made. <br />Statistics were compiled on each plume, and parame- <br />ters tabularized for the site of origin and whether it was <br />sampled on the valley, the ridge, or the downwind flight <br />track. These results are discussed in the following sec- <br />tions. <br /> <br />1) V ALLEY TRACK PLUME INTERSECTIONS <br /> <br />Table 3 lists a total of 31 valley interceptions of the <br />SF6 plume from site 7 made by the aircraft. The mean <br />distance from site 7 to the valley intercept was 13 kIn. <br />At this distance, the plume age varied dependent on <br />wind speed. On average, the plume was approximately <br />15 min downwind of the release point but varied from <br />10 min on 17 February to 27 min on 19 March. <br /> <br />For flights made in IFR conditions, the highest con- <br />centrations of SF6 at 2500 m and above were found on <br />5 February. Unfortunately, temperatures were too <br />warm at the release site to initiate seeding. This day, <br />along with 16 March, had the most liquid water at and <br />above 2500 m. The fewest plume interceptions were on <br />17 March. Only one plume intercept was observed on <br />the valley track. Winds were near 25 m s -Ion this day <br />and may have caused the plume to move almost hori- <br />zontally from the release altitude of 2200 m since very <br />little SF6 was found in the valley either. It should be <br />mentioned that when winds exceeded 25 m s -1 , aircraft <br />operations were aborted. <br />If the average SF6 concentration is plotted against the <br />SF6 intercept altitude (Fig. 10) for all plume intercepts <br />on aU experimental days, it is apparent that concentra- <br />tions peak at the release altitude and falloff dramatically <br />above and below this altitude. Fifty-five percent of the <br />passes made along the valley track at 2500 m showed <br />no SF6. Almost all passes made below 2400 m along the <br />valley track showed SF6 above background levels. <br />It is important to note the horizontal dimensions of <br />the plume to determine whether dispenser density is <br />sufficient to cover the target area. On average, the <br />plume is about 130 or 3 kIn wide over the valley. This <br />is very close to the dispersion rate used in the opera- <br />tional targeting model (section 4) and similar to the <br />average dispenser seperation. There is a tendency for <br />the plume to be wider at plume interceptions made near <br />the release altitude. This would indicate that the plume <br />centerline remains near the release altitude, with the <br />plume becoming narrower both above and below this <br />elevation. Thus, at 2500 m the aircraft is probably sam- <br />pling near the top of the plume over the valley as the <br />frequency of plume intersection drops off dramatically <br />and the plume width narrows. <br />Table 4 summarizes the valley plume interceptions <br />from site 9. Site 9 SF6 releases could not be made until <br />17 February due to equipment problems. Thus, many <br />of the plume interceptions were made on VFR flights <br />at altitudes below 2500 m. The mean distance from site <br />9 to the plume intercept was almost 18 kIn. This 5-kIn <br />difference compared to site 7 is a result of site 9 being <br /> <br /> TABLE 7. Sulfur hexaflouride plume characteristics from site 7 as observed by aircraft for downwind track. <br /> Plume <br /> width <br /> Dist. site 7 Max SF6 Avg SF6 AIt Temp Avg LWC Wind speed Wind direction <br />Date Pass C) (lan) (lan) (ppt) (ppt) (m) CC) (g m-3) (m S-I) ("1') <br />9 March 15 26 15 31 58 25 2471 3.1 0.00 10 197 <br />9 March 16 28 15 30 45 21 2475 2.9 0.00 5 215 <br />16 March 11 1 1 38 14 8 2606 0 0.25 NA NA <br />16 March 16 7 5 36 23 11 2597 -0.3 0.33 6 196 <br />16 March 18 16 10 33 23 9 2598 0.4 0.20 13 227 <br />Average 16 9 34 33 15 2549 1.2 0.16 8 209 <br />