Laserfiche WebLink
<br />/i <br />.. <br /> <br />, <br /> <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />b <br /> <br /> <br />D <br /> <br />Fig. 3. Regional airflow pattern on January 17, 1979, at <br />1800 UTC from the MM4 for the 700-mb level (3) and at <br />500 m agl (b). Locations of the standard synopti.c <br />rawinsonde sites at Desen Rock, NV (DRA), Wmslow, AZ <br />(INW), and Tucson, AZ (TUS) ~"abel~. .M~4 <br />sounding points selected for an uutial preclplt.BtJon <br />modeling study are shown by ( J..). and the am ~f the. <br />MogoUon Rim is shown by (A-). Two CCM gnd pomts <br />(.) lie within this limited region of the MM4. UOIts are <br />the same as in Figure 2. <br /> <br />Large variations in the horizontal gra~ients of <br />moisture and wind flow evolved throughout this storm. <br />These gradients controlled the moisture Dux .~d . <br />resulting distribution of condensate and preClpltaUon. <br />Figure 3 focuses on the region affe~ing th~ Ver.de and <br />Salt River Basins. It shows the detaIled gnd pawt <br />structure of airflow at sigma = 0.95 (boundary layer <br />air at 500 magI) and at 700 mb over Arizona at 1800 <br />UTe. Note that the surface pressure in this region <br />varies from 900 to 850 mb. Our analysis concentrates <br />on the low-level airflow which is strongly influenced by <br />the terrain and which is largely responsible for the <br />precipitation. A weU-defin~d cyclonic flow is shown by <br />the wind vectors (see Fig. 3). This region had a <br />100m S-I change in wind speed over a north-south <br />distance of 150 km at 700 mb (see Fig. 3a). This <br />mesoscale pattern of winds resulted in a wen- <br />organized zone of convergence from the bound:uY <br />layer to 700 mb with divergence at 300 mb, w~lch <br />produced strong lifting over. the region of m~lmum <br />precipitation. The divergence patterns (see FIg. 4) <br /> <br />show the spatial continuity and mesoscale structure <br />over north-central Arizona at the time of maximum <br />precipitation on January 17 at 1800 llJ'C. This <br />pattern moved from southern Arizona across the <br />region and into Colorado on the 18th. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br /> <br />b <br /> <br /> <br />Fig. 4. Regional divergence pattern on Janua.ry 17, 1979, at <br />1800 UTC at 300-mb (3) and 700-mb levels (b) illustrating <br />the mesoscale continuity of the storm dynamics. Units are <br />10-6 S.I. Dashed lines indicate convergence. The grid <br />points are as in Figure 2. <br /> <br />Significant spatia] variations in moisture <br />occurred in the mixing ratio fields from 500 m to <br />700 mb at 1800 ure. The boundary layer maximum <br />over southern Arizona shown in Figure S resulted in a <br />decrease of 3 g kg-I from south to north aver a <br />distance of 250 km across the watersheds of interest. <br />Aloft at 700 mb, the tongue of maximum moisture <br />passed over southeast Arizona resulting in an east.-to- <br />west decrease of 1.5 g kg-I along the Mogollon Rim. <br />The 40-percent decrease in mixing ratio over ~e . <br />domain combined with a 50-percent decrease 10 w10d <br />speed would result in large errors in computations of <br />precipitation from unrepresen~tive ~undiJllgs at . <br />standard synoptic stations shown in FIgure 3. Dunng <br />this period, the v-component of the wind all 700 mb <br />increased nearly S to 8 m S-I over the rim :in 6 hours. <br />Similarly significant changes in mixing ratio of about <br />1-2 g kg-I occurred, suggesting the importance of high <br />temporal resolution to describe the duration and <br />intensity of precipitation. These variations in moisture <br />supply for a specific watershed clearly show the <br />importance of defining the regional scale structure of <br />storms. Similar complex. nonlinear, mesoscale <br />patterns evolved over other watersheds in t.he Western <br />United States during January 1979. <br />