Laserfiche WebLink
<br />~ <br /> <br />and on into the post frontal airmass. A jet <br />maximum occurs near 80 kPa in excess of 15 m/:; <br />and a direction of about 2380 on the 0600 GMT, <br />15 December sounding. This jet occurred about <br />6 to 8 hours before the frontal passage i n thl~ <br />area. This jet presented an enhancement to the <br />orographic effect because of its perpendicular <br />component to the barrier. The horizontal <br />placement of the jet was over the foothills of <br />the Sierra Nevada as seen from the University <br />of Wyoming aircraft data. On the 1800 GMT, l!; <br />December sounding, the wind direction shows a <br />discontinuity centered near 70 kPa and an <br />associated jet in the same region. Since the <br />frontal passage occurred approximately at 1200 <br />GMT at the rawinsonde launch point this probably <br />represents the cold frontal surface in that <br />region as it reaches up to the vicinity of thE! <br />70 kPa jet maximum. <br /> <br />Subsequent to 1800 GMT, soundings no longer <br />showed a low level jet. The wind speeds con- <br />tinued to increase with height and the main <br />upper level jet stream maximum seen in Figure 8 <br />appeared as the dominant feature in the last <br />sounding. A rather sharp backing in the winds <br />was evident between the 2100 GMT, 15 December <br />and the 0000 GMT, 16 December soundi ngs in thE! <br />low levels. This is further indication that <br />the cold air intrusion was continuing into thEl <br />area. By this time, most precipitation had <br />ceased and clearing skies were the rule for alll <br />locations except higher mountainous areas whel'e <br />post frontal convective shower activity continued <br />for several more hours. <br /> <br />Several other cross sections were analyzed, and <br />some interesting features are worth mentionin~1 <br />at this time. The temperature cross section of <br />thi s storm showed a marked tendency for upper., <br />1 eve 1 temperature fa 11 s 9 to 12 hours in advance <br />of the frontal passage at surface stations. <br />The 50 kPa level between 0300 GMT, on 15 December <br />and 1200 GMT, 15 December experienced 50C <br />cooling from -150 to -200C. The OOC temperature <br />height dropped from about 71 kPa to 80 kPa <br />during that same 9 hour period. The effect of <br />the band passage on 14 December on temperature! <br />was not nearly so evident but falls of 10-20e <br />did occur and could be attributed to the conVE!C- <br />tive band passage. The wet bulb potential <br />temperature analyses indicated moderate insta.. <br />bilities associated with the band and high <br />instabilities associated with the front. The <br />stable period of the storm is reflected in the: <br />low potential temperature gradients between <br />2100 GMT, 14 December and 0900 GMT, 15 Decembe:r. <br /> <br />The presence of moisture in this or any storm <br />can be represented in several ways. Analysis <br />of the relative humidity time cross section of <br />this storm, figure 11, showed several characte:r- <br />istics which could be common to many Sierra <br />storms. First, in advance of the actual preci- <br />pitation on the ground, a layering of moisture <br />is seen on the soundings. Two, three or even <br />more moisture layers are not uncommon in pre- <br />storm as well as in storm soundings. This <br />feature is visibly evident in the multiple <br />cloud layers that are often seen in storms. <br />Photographs taken by the University of Wyoming <br /> <br />verify this multi-layering of clouds on 14 <br />December. The cross section shows another <br />feature of interest. In general, between the <br />main convective band on 14 December and the <br />cold frontal passage on 15 December, the moisture <br />remained reasonably uniform and high. Relative <br />humidities in excess of 70 percent were seen as <br />high as 44 kPa with increasing amounts toward <br />the surface. It appeared that the passage of <br />the band caused some lowering of moisture <br />content for about nine hours after passage. <br />The frontal passage was preceded by dropping <br />moisture levels until 1200 GMT, 15 December, <br />where 70 percent relative humidities existed <br />only below 72 kPa. Cloud top temperatures <br />observed from the GOES-WEST satellite were very <br />cold during the period from 0300 to 1100 GMT, <br />15 December. Temperatures below -400e were <br />common until just before frontal passage and <br />were associated with a high cirrus deck. Cloud <br />top temperatures warmed to near -200e as the <br />front moved through the area and the cirrus <br />deck dissipated. The cold frontal passage is <br />marked by an increase in low level moisture <br />centered around 80 kPa to near saturation. <br />This is understandable because of the polar <br />maritime nature of the airmass. <br /> <br />A look at the wet bulb potential temperature <br />cross section shows instability just prior to <br />both the band and the front. The atmosphere <br />was still stable in the sounding preceding the <br />band. The jet core was located above the <br />maximum region of instability near the band. <br />However, as the band passed over the area, the <br />region of instability and jet maximum occurred <br />in the same general region. The instability <br />ahead of the front, is indicated to be about in <br />the same location as the jet maximum. There <br />was little vertical displacement. <br /> <br />It does appear that low level jet cores act as <br />a transport mechanism for low level moisture <br />(Hobbs, 1976). Further case study analyses <br />will be necessary to ascertain whether this is <br />coincidence or is a feature of many storms in <br />this area. <br /> <br />4. MICROPHYSICS AND PRECIPITATION ANALYSIS <br /> <br />The signature of a storm as determined by <br />precipitation on the ground as measured in the <br />gage and the analysis of snow crystals on the <br />ground can reveal properties of the storm that <br />are important. <br /> <br />Precipitation received on the ground was reported <br />by about 40 recording tipping bucket gages in <br />and near the project area. The analysis of the <br />gage data available yielded some clues as to <br />the effects of Sierra Nevada topography on <br />precipitation amounts. It was noted that the <br />lowest precipitation total for the storm occurred <br />at Auburn, ealifornia (350 m) and the highest <br />total was at Blue Canyon, California (1600 <br />meters). Precipitation increased gradually in <br />a west-to-east direction across the barrier <br />from Auburn (4.67 cm) to Baxter (7.1 cm). <br />However, from Baxter to Blue Canyon the precipi- <br />tation amount rose from 7.11 cm to 11.77 cm in <br />about 400 m of elevation increase. The distance <br /> <br />154 <br />