Laserfiche WebLink
<br />1154 <br /> <br />JOURNAL OF APPLIED METEOROLOGY <br /> <br />VOLUME 27 <br /> <br />seeded ice particles should tend to be smaller than older <br />natural crystals, and a decrease in the SL W content of <br />the seeded volume might be anticipated. For these rea- <br />sons, measurements of ice particles and SL W were <br />critical to the conduct of the experiment. Observations <br />of ice nuclei (effectively of AgI; see Part I) were also <br />necessary to verify the targeting and approximate extent <br />of the seeded cloud volume. <br />The lowest IFR sampling over the BR T A was at 2.7 <br />km, 300 m above the highest terrain and approximately <br />the same level as the crest of the Main Ridge. Results <br />of previous VFR plume tracing indicated that this low <br />flight level was necessary for the successful conduct of <br />the experiments. It should be noted that IFR sampling <br />this near to the barrier, made possible by a fortuitous <br />combination of light air traffic, a nearby navigational <br />station, and low terrain crosswind of the target, is not <br />practical in most mountain locations. As will be shown, <br />monitoring at normal terrain clearance altitudes of 600 <br />m agl usually detected little of the seeding material that <br />was consistently present nearer the BRTA surface. <br />Prior to 0900 (all times MST) of each operational <br />day, a forecast was prepared using National Weather <br />Service products as well as pibal and surface observa- <br />tions from the seeding site. If a westerly wind com- <br />ponent and substantial clouds existed or were forecast, <br />a technician was instructed to start the AgI generator <br />approximately an hour prior to aircraft takeoff. <br />At the start of most research missions, the aircraft <br />entered a holding pattern over the Bozeman Airport <br />(BZN), 13 km west of the seeding site, while a sounding <br />was made to about 5.2 km, or to above the cloud deck, <br />whichever was lowest. Following the sounding, a west- <br />to-east pass was made over the seeding site to the <br />Shields Valley (Fig. 1). The aircraft then returned to <br />the BRTA and conducted a series of N-S passes de- <br />scending from 3.9 to 2.7 km in 300 m intervals to 3.0 <br />km, and 150 m steps below. The flight to the Shields <br />Valley and the descending profile were to test for un- <br />manageable turbulence. <br />Following the BR T A traverses, a sounding was often <br />made over the Shields Valley, after which the aircraft <br />returned to BZN along the SSL (see Fig. 1). The flight <br />plan was generally adhered to, excepting variations <br />imposed by the flight controller due to other aircraft <br />traffic. <br /> <br />3. Determination of seeded and control zones <br /> <br />Most results presented in this paper are from the <br />analysis ofN-S passes made over the BRTA. The seg- <br />ment of each pass with an enhancement in ice particle <br />concentration (IPC), presumably due to AgI seeding <br />(hereafter enhanced IPC zone), was determined in the <br />following manner. The natural background IPC was <br />established for the sampling level by examining the <br />regions well north and south of any obvious enhanced <br />IPC zone. The upper values of the natural background <br /> <br />IPC were used to determine the edges of the high IPC <br />zone by examining the buffer-by-buffer listing of IPC <br />from the 2D-C probe. The north (south) edge of the <br />enhanced IPC zone was considered to be that distance <br />from the SSL where travel further north (south) would <br />encounter no greater than natural maximum IPC levels <br />for several kilometers. <br />Once the enhanced IPC zone was defined for each <br />pass, attention was given to determining the entire <br />seeded zone and the neighboring nonseeded cloud re- <br />gions that would serve as control zones. Each side of <br />the seeded zone was considered to be bounded by the <br />enhanced IPC zone or by the estimated AgI plume <br />edge position nearest in time for that side, whichever <br />resulted in greater crosswind extent. Most commonly, <br />the enhanced IPC zone boundaries determined both <br />edges of the seeded zone, probably due to the errors in <br />estimation of the AgI plume edge position discussed <br />in Part I. However, on a few passes, AgI was detected <br />up to a few kilometers further crosswind, which may <br />be because the AgI did not encounter SL W in these <br />limited regions. <br />Control zones of 2.5 km width were finally desig- <br />nated both north and south of the seeded zone using <br />1.0 km "buffer zones" between the seeded zone and <br />each control zone. The purpose ofthe buffer zones was <br />to minimize the effects of any underestimates of AgI <br />plume width and the "tails" of the seeding-caused ice <br />particle plume that might have IPC values just below <br />the background selected. <br />The above procedures might seem unduly compli- <br />cated, since in practice, defining the seeded zone was <br />usually straightforward, because of abrupt increases in <br />IPC and because the enhanced ice particle region was <br />wider than the estimated AgI plume width. However, <br />on a limited number of passes the seeded zone was not <br />obvious and an objective means of handling these <br />"problem cases" was considered desirable. <br />The seeded zones were subdivided into thirds for <br />more detailed examination. If, for example, the IPC <br />had a Gaussian distribution, the center of the seeded <br />zone would exhibit the highest concentration. If ice <br />particles settled to the sampling level in the presence <br />of vertical wind directional shear, the seeded zone could <br />have a skewed distribution, with the highest IPC on <br />the side overlain by the falling particles. North-south <br />gradients in SL W could also cause variations across <br />the seeded zones. <br /> <br />-\ <br />. I <br />~ <br /> <br />4. Results of six in-cloud sampling missions <br /> <br />January 1985 was colder and much drier than usual; <br />the average monthly temperature at the Bozeman Air- <br />port was 2.70C below the normal. The 1 Feb 1985 <br />snowpack water equivalent at the highest altitude <br />Bridger Range snow course was only 63% of the long- <br />term average. The colder periods of the month were <br />usually dry. <br />