Laserfiche WebLink
<br />1150 <br /> <br />JOURNAL OF APPLIED METEOROLOGY <br /> <br />VOLUME 27 <br /> <br />Mesa in a sheltered clearing about 300 m south of and <br />100 m below the Mesa caprock. Winds were rarely <br />more than 2 m s -1 at this location. Snow fell down a <br />31 cm diameter chimney onto cold glass plates for <br />timed intervals. These plates were photographed with <br />sufficient detail to identify the particle habits as well <br />as the concentrations. The area of the collection plate <br />photographed was always the same, so any possible <br />tendency of the camera operator to select areas con- <br />taining the larger or more interesting crystals was <br />avoided. <br /> <br />4. Methodology <br /> <br />The ground-based seeding techniques used over the <br />Bridger Range and the Grand Mesa were essentially <br />identical, while the airborne seeding method used over <br />the Grand Mesa employed a different approach. In each <br />of the experiments, a single seeding generator was used. <br /> <br />a. Ground-based seeding experiments <br /> <br />For each of the ground-based experiments, a single <br />AgI generator was operated well up the windward side <br />of the barrier. The plume thus generated was advected <br />up and over the barrier into the orographic cloudmass, <br />as will be shown in Parts II and III. <br />An instrumented aircraft monitored the seeded cloud <br />volume and neighboring natural cloud volumes by <br />making constant-altitude passes downwind of the gen- <br />erator and approximately perpendicular to the wind. <br />Aircraft altitude sometimes varied from pass to pass <br />but was usually the minimum allowable: about 300 m <br />above the highest terrain in the vicinity. Reciprocal <br />passes at a single altitude were utilized to delineate the <br />leading edges of the AgI plume as defined by (1), so <br />that the width of the plume was approximated for each <br />pair of passes. Any corresponding increases in IPC were <br />presumed to be due to the Agl. Natural clouds cross- <br />wind on either side of the plume were evaluated as <br />controls for comparison with the regions containing <br />AgI and enhanced IPC. <br /> <br />b. Airborne seeding experiments <br /> <br />To initiate each airborne seeding experiment, the <br />aircraft AgI generator was ignited and an arc flown at <br />a constant distance from the surface target at the lowest <br />permissible altitude. Each arc was centered on the line <br />intersecting the surface target and parallel with the <br />mean wind at the seeding altitude. The distance of each <br />arc from the target was varied from experiment to ex- <br />periment in an effort to assess the impacts on plume <br />spreading, nucleation, and precipitation development. <br />After each seeding pass the instrumented aircraft <br />made a series of sampling passes at the seeding altitude, <br />over the Snow Lab and parallel to the mean wind. The <br />evolution of the AgI plume as it spread, encountered <br />SLW, and produced enhanced IPCs was thereby mon- <br /> <br />itored. As in the ground-based experiments, regions <br />having enhanced IPC coincident with AgI were pre- <br />sumed seeded. Some additional knowledge about the <br />deformation and stretching of the plume was also ob- <br />tained. <br />The ultimate evaluation of each airborne seeding <br />experiment was based on the characteristics and inten- <br />sity of the precipitation observed at the Snow Lab sur- <br />face target, which were monitored for the duration of <br />each experiment by means of the previously described <br />ice crystal photography system. <br /> <br />5. Summary <br /> <br />Several winter orographic cloud seeding experiments <br />were carried out over mountain barriers in Montana <br />and Colorado. Silver iodide was released either on the <br />windward slope or by aircraft. Recent advances in <br />technology made it feasible to detect (i) the AgI in- <br />cloud to within about 300 m of each target area's high- <br />est terrain; (ii) corresponding changes in ice particle <br />concentration, habits and sizes; and (iii) corresponding <br />changes in SL W content. Relative changes in the pre- <br />cipitation rate were estimated at aircraft levels with a <br />recently developed computerized approach. In addi- <br />tion, surface observations of seeding-induced changes <br />in ice particle characteristics and precipitation were <br />made in Colorado. <br />In this first part of a three-part study, we have de- <br />scribed the experimental design and physical hypothesis <br />underlying the experiments and discussed in detail the <br />instrumentation used, its associated calibrations and <br />limitations, and the methodology employed in each <br />type of experiment. <br />The results of applying the instrumentation and <br />methodology [described here] are found in Parts II <br />and III. They show that marked changes in cloud mi- <br />crophysics were detectable with both airborne and <br />ground-based AgI seeding of winter orographic clouds. <br /> <br />REFERENCES <br /> <br />American Meteorological Society, 1985: Planned and inadvertent <br />weather modification: A policy statement of the American Me- <br />teorological Society as adopted by the Council on September <br />27, 1984. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 66,447-449. <br />Boe, B. A., and A. B. Super, 1986: Wintertime characteristics of <br />supercooled liquid water over the Grand Mesa of western Col- <br />orado. J. Wea, Mod., 18, 102-107. <br />DeMott, P. J., W. G. Finnegan and L. O. Grant, 1983: An application <br />of chemical kinetic theory and methodology to characterize the <br />ice nucleating properties of aerosols used for weather modifi- <br />cation. J. Climate Appl. Meteor" 22, 1190-1203. <br />Deshler, T., 1988: Corrections of surface particle probe measurements <br />for the effects of aspiration. J, Atmos. Ocean, Tech., 5, accepted. <br />Flossmann, A. I., W. D. Hull and H. R. Pruppacher, 1985: A theo- <br />retical study of the wet removal of atmospheric pollutants. Part <br />I: The redistribution of aerosol particles captured through nu- <br />cleation and impaction scavenging by growing cloud drops. J. <br />Atmos. Sci" 42, 583-606. <br /> <br />.~. <br />