Laserfiche WebLink
<br />1148 <br /> <br />JOURNAL OF APPLIED METEOROLOGY <br /> <br />VOLUME 27 <br /> <br />time required to cycle the unit to calculate the SL W <br />content, for 17 cases having continuous liquid water <br />over the distance required for one cycle of the probe. <br />Droplet collection efficiency was considered to be unity <br />at typical aircraft flight speeds. Cycle times ranged from <br />11-70 s and resulting mean SL W contents were from <br />0.22-0.03 g m -3. These were compared with the mean <br />J-W contents for the same time intervals. The corre- <br />lation coefficient for the 17 data pairs was 0.975. The <br />J-W tended to be about 0.01 g m -3 higher for values <br />near 0.05 g m -3, while the Rosemount tended to be <br />about 0.03 g m -3 higher for values near 0.15 g m -3 . <br />This comparison indicates that the J-W SLW content <br />values were reasonably accurate. <br /> <br />d. AgI detection <br /> <br />An NCAR acoustical ice nucleus counter was used <br />to determine the approximate AgI plume position in <br />each experiment. The acoustical counter will be dis- <br />cussed in some detail because it is not as commonly <br />used as other aircraft instrumentation. Although a <br />number of individuals or groups have had inconsistent <br />results with acoustical counters, properly maintained <br />and operated systems have provided consistent results <br />in detection of AgI from day to day and location to <br />location. For examples, see Super (1974) and Heim- <br />bach and Stone (1984). <br />Different but very similar counters were used on the <br />two aircraft. They were improved versions of the coun- <br />ter discussed in detail by Langer (1973). Air from out- <br />side the aircraft cabin was sampled at about 10 L min-1 <br />and had water vapor and cloud condensation nuclei <br />added prior to injection into a refrigerated 17 L cloud <br />chamber maintained near - 20oC. This resulted in <br />cloud formation near the chamber top with droplet <br />concentrations well in excess of natural cloud. The high <br />droplet concentration was intended to limit transient <br />supersaturations to a few tenths of one percent and to <br />partially offset the short chamber residence time (1-2 <br />min for most particles), which is especially important <br />for ice crystal formation that is due to contact nucle- <br />ation. The work of Demott et al. (1983) suggests con- <br />tact nucleation as the predominate mechanism with <br />the type of seeding material used. In spite of the marked <br />differences between natural clouds and those main- <br />tained in the acoustical counter, Langer and Garvey <br />(1980) reported good agreement between measure- <br />ments of ice nucleus concentrations with various AgI <br />smokes using an acoustical counter and measurements <br />obtained in the Colorado State University (CSU) iso- <br />thermal chamber. The latter simulates natural clouds <br />much better than the former. <br />Cloudy air was continuously drawn out the bottom <br />of the counter chamber through an acoustic sensor, <br />where ice crystals that had grown larger than about 20 <br />~m produced audible clicks. These sounds were con- <br />verted to voltages by a small microphone and the total <br /> <br />"counts" then processed and recorded once per second <br />by appropriate electronics. The formation of large <br />droplets in the cloud chamber injection tube, which <br />could also trigger the sensor,. was avoided by slightly <br />heating the tube to prevent condensation. <br />Laboratory work has revealed that only about 10% <br />of the ice crystals formed in the cloud chamber reach <br />the acoustic sensor due to losses on the glycol-covered <br />walls and exit cone (Langer 1973). However, unless <br />otherwise noted, the data reported are simply the counts <br />as detected by the acoustic sensor. <br />The acoustical counters, operated at - 200C at both <br />experimental sites, indicated that the background con- <br />centration of natural ice nuclei was almost zero. <br />Whether numerically correct or not, this characteristic <br />made detection of AgI straightforward, since experience <br />showed that encounters of more than a few counts per <br />minute were always downwind of an AgI source. As <br />used in these experiments, the acoustical counters were <br />essentially AgI detectors rather than natural ice nucleus <br />detectors, and their response will be presumed to be <br />due to AgI only. <br />The entry edge position of an AgI plume can be <br />approximated by estimating the delay time to first <br />counts. The width of a ground-released plume can be <br />estimated by making pairs of passes in opposite cross- <br />wind directions as done by Super (1974), which as- <br />sumes that plume meander is not significant in the <br />several minutes between passes. This is not always <br />valid, particularly in very stable conditions. <br />Each counter's delay time was empirically deter- <br />mined from ground tests in which varying amounts of <br />AgI smoke were injected into the counter by hypoder- <br />mic syringe over a few to several seconds. The delay <br />time (.:It) was defined as the first second of the first <br />seven-second period having three or more total counts. <br />Because nucleation, growth and detection in the <br />acoustical counter is a stochastic process, first-response <br />time was well related to the total counts ( C) per injec- <br />tion by a power curve of the form <br /> <br />.:It = AC-P, <br /> <br />(1) <br /> <br />where A and P were empirically determined constants. <br />As an example, a correlation coefficient of 0.88 resulted <br />from this power curve fit to the data from the counter <br />used over the Grand Mesa, where A = 50.6 and P <br />= 0.10. Individual data points were within :t3 s of the <br />curve for total counts greater than 100, but some de- <br />partures were as great as 6 s for lower amounts of AgI. <br />Equation (1) was used to estimate the entry edge po- <br />sition on each flight through an AgI plume where C <br />was the total counts recorded during the pass. However, <br />(1) does not strictly apply because the time to traverse <br />a plume was usually much longer than the AgI injection <br />period in the ground tests. As a consequence, derived <br />plume widths are narrower than the actual widths. The <br />problem is not usually serious because, for example, <br />