Laserfiche WebLink
<br />~ <br />I <br />I~ <br />I <br /> <br />IR3 <br /> <br />SILVER IODIDE GENERATOR <br /> <br />275 <br /> <br />The ACGIH threshold level for carbon monoxide is 100 ppm in air. This is <br />the concentration which can be tolerated day after day without adverse effect. <br />Higher concentrations can be accepted for limited periods. Concentrations of <br />400 ppm to 500 ppm in air can be inhaled for 1 hr without appreciable effect. <br />Exposure to 600 ppm to 700 ppm for 1 hr wil.l produce barely appreciable <br />effects. The same exposure to 1,000 ppm to 1,200 ppm is dangerous. Exposure <br />to 4,000 ppm or greater is fatal in less than an hour (10). <br />It is highly unlikely that an individual would expose himself to an effluent <br />temperature of 150" F for more than a few minutes. Cooling and further dilu- <br />tion to a tolerable temperature will reduce the carbon monoxide concentration <br />well below the ACGIH threshold level. Therefore the hazard to an individual <br />from the' carbon monoxide emitted from a silver iodide generator is non- <br />existent. ,The hazard to the general population by this material is also <br />nonexistent. <br />Propane-acetone silver-iodide generators have been in common use for <br />over 15 y,r. During this arne, only one instance of reaction to the effluent has <br />been reported. In this case, an individual was servicing a silver-iodide gener- <br />ator mounted on a tower and remained within a few feet of it, directly in the <br />effluent, fbr a period of 6 hr. He suffered a skin rash which, while inconvenient, <br />was not $erious enough to cause loss of work. No other substantiated case of <br />injury (or reaction) to any individual has been reported as arising from the <br />chemical icontent of the effluent of a silver iodide generator. <br />To further emphasize the inoffensive nature of a silver-iodide generator, <br />the materials it releases can be contrasted with other materials being re- <br />leased to,the atmosphere on a routine basis. Industrial plants, home heating <br />furnaces and incinerators, aircraft, automobiles, and many other products of <br />our advanced civilization are releasing tons of materials to the atmosphere <br />each day. Public concern with the problem of air pollution is steadily increas- <br />ing and sqme legislative action has been taken to lessen this problem. <br />A silver-iodide generator and an automobile engine are similar in size and <br />fuel consumption rate. Both release unfiltered combustion products to the free <br />air close to the ground. It is therefore reasonable to contrast their effluents. <br />. The n~mber of silver-iodide generators which would be employed for a <br />target area will vary somewhat depending upon the operator. Fifteen to 30 <br />generators might be installed for a rectangular target area of 2,000 sq miles. <br />During seeding operations no more than about half of them would be used at <br />anyone time. In general, one generator is used for each 100 sq miles of target <br />area. On the other hand, automobiles are in common use throughout the nation; <br />their density dependent upon the population. <br /> <br />AUTOMOBILE EXHAUSTS <br /> <br />It is w~ll known there are many materials found in automobile exhaust <br />which contribute substantially to air pollution (8). Among these are nitrogen <br />oxides, unburned hydrocarbons, metallic salts, and carbon oxides. <br />Two materials found in automobile exhaust were selected for comparison <br />with the c0mponents of the effluent of a silver-iodide generator. These two <br />materials in automobile exhaust present potential and actual toxic hazards. <br />Carbon monoxide, highly toxic, is present in automobile exhaust in concen- <br />trations and temperatures as follows (2): <br /> <br />i <br />. <br />