Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Iraham: Field Experimentation in Weather Modification <br /> <br />65 <br /> <br />mented. Neither of these facts could have been learned <br />hadthe project not employed randomization. <br /> <br />winds and cloud-top temperatures. A substantial effort <br />went into the experiment design. Advice was sought from <br />many statisticians and meteorologists, and nonscientific <br />. sectors also had much to say about the final design. In due <br />course, a project was carried out over a portion of the <br />SanJuan Mountains of Colorado during five winter <br />seasons between 1970 and 1976. Although the final report <br />of the project has not yet been published, many details <br />are available from a very comprehensive contractor re- <br />port by Elliott et al. (1976). <br />The design called for unrestricted. randomized seeding <br />during 24-hour periods forecast to have suitable winds and <br />cloud-top temperatures equal to or exceeding -250C. <br />There were 147 experimental days, 71 seeded and 76 not- <br />seeded. Silver iodide nuclei were released from ground <br />generators upwind of the target, the number and location <br />of generators depending on wind direction and speed. An <br />attempt was made to tailor the generator output ac- <br />cording to anticipated cloud-top temperatures, with <br />higher output.s on days with warmer clouds. Apparently, <br />cloud-top temperatures were not often measured directly <br />but were computed from data obtained from project <br />radiosondes released upwind of the target. <br />There were eighteen precipitation stations in the tar- <br />get area for which data were available for all five years.. <br />The ratio of seeded- to not-seeded-day precipitation at <br />individual stations ranged from 0.7-1.01, with 16 of 18 <br />being less than 1.00. Application of a rank-sum test led <br />to the conclusion that there were no statistically signifi- <br />cant differences in precipitation attributable to seeding. <br />According to the Elliott et al. report, apparently no effort <br />was made to obtain an overall seeding result for the entire <br />target. . <br />A number of post-factum studies were carried out. One <br />of these indicated that up to 22 of the control days might <br />have been seeded as a result of carry-over of seeding <br />material from the previous (seeded) day or from another <br />project upwind of the target. When these 22 days were <br />removed, the treatment effect ratios at individual stations <br />ranged from 0.94-1.51, with 16 of 18 greater than 1.00. <br />The rank-sum test applied to individual stations again <br />indicated no statistically significant difference. Another <br />ex post facto study showed that cloud conditions actually <br />changed substantially within individual experimental <br />periods and that seeding had not been limited to clouds <br />meeting the suitability criteria. Therefore, the seeded <br />and not-seeded periods were divided into 6-hour blocks <br />and stratified according to cloud-top temperature and <br />air-mass stability. This analysis suggested substantial <br />snowfall increases from seeding during stable thermo- <br />dynamic conditions and cloud-top temperatures between <br />-90C and - 290C. Colder cloud tops and most conditions <br />of deep convection seemed to be associated with snowfall <br />decreases. <br />Scientifically the San Juan Project appears to have <br />been a suc. cess in that it verified the scientific hypotheses <br />I <br />from Climax I and Climax II. Operationally, it was a <br />failhre because the design was not effectively imple- <br />! <br /> <br />~'4: <br /> <br /> <br />~,;:,.~____.i';':<,~L,:,_.".~ .cJ--.-.lo;._"i...' <br /> <br />4.3 I~roject FACE <br /> <br />Project FACE (Florida Area Cumulus Experiment) of <br />the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration is <br />an experiment to determine whether rainfall from large <br />cumulus clouds can be increased through application of <br />the dynamic seeding strategy described in Section 2. <br />Phase I, the exploratory phase, was carried out during <br />five summers between 1970 and 1976 (Simpson and <br />Woodley 1971, 1975; Woodley and Sax 1976; Woodley <br />et al. 1977). <br />This project considered both a geographically fixed <br />target and wind-borne (floating) targets within it. Seeding <br />was randomized by day. Experimental days were selected <br />on the basis of certain suitability criteria involving radar <br />observations and calculations of a numerical model. The <br />model was used to predict the amount of cloud-top <br />growth expected from the glaciation of an individual <br />cloud turret. The design called for seeding individual, <br />growing cloud turrets near their tops by dropping into <br />them pyrotechnic flares containing silver iodide. l3Y <br />glaciating the updraft region of many adjacent cloud <br />turrets, the experimenters hoped to assist those clouds <br />to organize their convective motions and to merge into a <br />larger cloud system. Growth by mergers of many smaller <br />clouds has long been recognized as a pattern of develop- <br />ment of convective rainstorms. As yet, there are only <br />very crude theories to account for this behavior of natural <br />clouds, much less to anticipate changes in such behavior <br />as a result of seeding. <br />The primary response variate was surface rainfall cal- <br />culated from radar measurements, with and without an <br />adjustment factor obtained from clusters of surface rain <br />gages. As a result of local cloud climatology, most of the <br />experiments were conducted during mid to late <br />afternoons. <br />The seeding decision was determined through a random <br />process after suitable clouds were observed to be present <br />within the target area. The seeding decision was not <br />communicated to the scientists responsible for judging <br />cloud. suitability. Final acceptance of an experimental <br />day depended on the development of six or more suitable <br />cloud.s, or of clouds suitable for the expenditure of 60 or <br />more seeding flares, or both. Application of these selection <br />criteria led to 39 seeded days and 36 not-seeded days <br />spre:ll.d over five summers. <br />AJlthough there were several changes in the experiment <br />as it progressed, only two have thus far been identified <br />as a,ffecting the. results: (1) a change in the type of <br />seeding flares used (1975), and (2) a change in the <br />number and types of airplanes used for seeding (1976). <br />However, the analysis underwent continual evolution <br />both in overall philosophy (Bayesian, significance testing, <br />exploratory data analysis) and in the partitions and co- <br />variates considered. A comprehensive reporting of FACE <br />was given at a 1977 scientific meeting, .from which the <br /> <br />