My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WMOD00477
CWCB
>
Weather Modification
>
DayForward
>
WMOD00477
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/28/2009 2:40:06 PM
Creation date
4/23/2008 1:57:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Weather Modification
Title
Field Evaluation of a Dual-Channel Microwave Radiometer Designed for Measurements of Integrated Water Vapor and Cloud Liquid Water in the Atmosphere
Date
3/1/1987
Weather Modification - Doc Type
Report
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />MARCH 1987, <br /> <br />MARK HEGGLI, ROBERT M. RAUBER AND 1. B. SNIDER <br /> <br />207 <br /> <br /> <br />n <br /> <br />three occasions during calibrations. Procedures asso- <br />ciated with analysis of data for each of these modes <br />and results of the comparisons are the subject of the <br />following discussion. <br /> <br />1) VERTICAL MODE <br /> <br />The largest portion of the 3-week experiment was <br />reserved for data collection in the vertical mode. This <br />dataset included both cloudy and clear weather events. <br />Due to differences in the operating programs of the <br />two radiometers, data were recorded at different rates. <br />The NOAA radiometer recorded data each minute, the <br />USBR radiometer every 2 min. The NOAA I-min data <br />points were averaged and compared to the 2-min values <br />obtained by the USBR radiometer. The total 2-min <br />averaging periods for the two radiometers were simul- <br />taneous. <br />Figures 2 and 3 show the comparisons of the mea- <br />surements of integrated water vapor (centimeters) and <br />liquid (millimeters) for the vertical mode dataset. The <br />vapor data are stratified into three groups:' pairs ob- <br />tained when liquid water was recorded (liquid water <br />~ 0.05 mm), pairs obtained when little or no liquid <br />water was recorded (liquid water < 0.05 mm) and all <br />data points. Statistics are given in Table 1. <br />A high correlation (0.95) was obtained for the mea- <br />surement of vapor in the total dataset. However, the <br />correlation was lower (0.79) in periods when liquid was <br />present. The mean absolute difference and the rms dif- <br />ference for no liquid and all points were between 0.05 <br /> <br />1.00 <br /> <br /> 0.75 <br />E <br />.!J <br />0:: <br />0 <br />0... <br /><( <br />> <br />cr: 0.50 <br />W <br />I- <br /><{ <br />:3 <br />0:: <br />OJ .. , <br />IJ) <br />::J <br /> 025 <br /> <br />0.08.00 <br /> <br />0.25 <br /> <br />0.50 <br /> <br />NOM WATER VAPOR (em) <br /> <br />and 0.07 cm. The values were higher (0.07 and 0.08, <br />respectively) in the presence ofliquid. These differences <br />compare favorably with a rms difference of 0.08 cm <br />for two collocated radiometers reported by Hogg et aI., <br />(1983). <br />Measurements of integrated liquid water were con- <br />sidered when either radiometer reported a threshold <br />value of 0.05 mm. For this comparison, a correlation <br />coefficient of 0.99 was obtained with an average ab- <br />solute difference of 0.02 mm. The rms difference was <br />also only 0.02 mm. <br /> <br />2) SCANNING MODE <br /> <br />Direct comparison of the radiometric measurements <br />during azimuth scans offers two advantages over ver- <br />tical comparisons. The primary advantage is that the <br />integration path extends over a larger atmospheric path <br />length, resulting in larger values of the measured pa- <br />rameters. This is particularly helpful when only low <br />concentrations ofliquid water are present. The second <br />major advantage is that a wide range of values can be <br />obtained, particularly in the liquid measurement, due <br />to the large temporal and spatial variability of liquid <br />water in an orographic environment. This variability, <br />however, requires that the antenna beams be closely <br />coordinated in space and time to make comparisons <br />valid. <br />Six coordinated scans were made during a 3-h storm <br />period on 28 November 1984. The scans were done at <br />a 150 elevation angle between the azimuths of 1730 <br /> <br />&,. <br />00 .... <br />%~O ~o. ," <br />(DO; is~ lo<f. Q~'go :0 <br />o"tl8...... 0 og8;~.~. 0 00 <br />OCl(l) .u~... <br />oo~o 0 o+;ffi ..,~ o~o <br />o -~ ,," 0 <br />.. "0 ,,'0 o~ 0 <br />:.... ..:~ ' <br />...... !+ o~ <br />-: .p <br />.0, <br /> <br />!ii\fr; . 0.B~3d5 <br />~cirt:=S~lO <br />_._...Y.... <br /> <br />P8:f.ei~t~~~rr~~t > = '~~<j'P' <br />Average a'R'Mg1,,= d1l8~~ . .669 <br />Number sy~t&'; : T7 <br /> <br />All ~;rs <br />Corielale:n1 cae ,'(tent '" 0.948 <br />Average a'R'Mg1,,= .~7src1rce . .054 <br />Nu~~~r Po" end ,811 <br /> <br />~~t~;~~~22 <br />.... y.. <br /> <br />~\f,' . 0.8704 <br />~rr:=~~r <br /> <br />0.75 <br /> <br />1.00 <br /> <br />FIG. 2. Scatter plot of integrated water vapor retrieved by the NOAA and USBR radiometers <br />. from data taken at Steamboat Springs, Colorado. Statistics are provided for vapor retrieved in <br />the absence ofliquid water (0), in liquid water (+), and all points. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.