Laserfiche WebLink
<br />MARCH 1987 <br /> <br />MARK HEGGLI, ROBERT M. RAUBER AND J. B. SNIDER <br /> <br />205 <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br />The field evaluation was performed in two phases. <br />The first, carried out in the SCPP, compared radio- <br />metric measurements of water vapor with precipitable <br />water vapor measurements made by a collocated ra- <br />winsonde unit. The second phase was conducted during <br />COSE. During this experiment two radiometers were <br />brought together for an intercomparison test. A limited <br />number of rawinsondes were also launched during <br />routine radiometer calibrations to compare vapor <br />measurements. <br />A third phase of the experiment, not reported here, <br />attempted to compare radiometric liquid measure- <br />ments with in situ measurements by aircraft. To date, <br />this later experiment has met with limited success, pri- <br />marily because variations in cloud integrated liquid <br />occur on time scales shorter than that required for an <br />aircraft to descend through the cloud (e.g., Heggli and <br />Reynolds, 1985; Rauber et al., 1986). <br /> <br />2. Instrumentation <br /> <br />a. Dual channel microwave radiometer <br /> <br />The dual channel microwave radiometer is a ground- <br />based passive instrument which determines the bright- <br />ness temperatures emitted by water vapor and cloud <br />liquid water. The quantity of vapor and liquid is de- <br />termined by the magnitude of the brightness temper- <br />ature at specific microwave frequencies. The principles <br />of microwave thermal emission from Rayleigh atten- <br />utating clouds have been described by Westwater <br />(1972). The design and operation of the dual-channel <br />ground based microwave radiometer have been pre- <br />sented by Hogg et aI., (1983) and Guiraud et aI., (1979). <br />The SCPP radiometer was designed by NOAA and <br />manufactured by the Hughes Corporation. <br />The radiometer operates at two frequencies: 20.6 <br />GHz, sensitive primarily to water vapor, and 31.65 <br />GHz, sensitive primarily to liquid water. The antenna <br />beam width is 2.50. Path-integrated amounts of water <br />vapor and liquid water, expressed as depth in centi- <br />meters and millimeters, respectively, are calculated <br />from the radiometer measurements of brightness tem- <br />perature using statistical retrieval algorithms (Hogg et <br />aI., 1983). The coefficients in these algorithms are de- <br />rived from a set of radiosonde data appropriate to the <br />area in which observations are made. The coefficients <br />include the effects of the small absorption by oxygen <br />at each operative frequency. For nonprecipitating <br />clouds or clouds with relatively low amounts ofliquid <br />. water (i.e., < 1.5 mm zenith-equivalent), the retrieval <br />coefficients are self-correcting and limit the algorithm <br />induced measurement uncertainty to less than 5% <br />(Westwater and Guiraud, 1980). This measurement <br />uncertainty can be further reduced through the use of <br />adaptive coefficients, which are a function of the initial <br />estimates of the amounts of vapor and liquid present <br />during the observation. However, due to the low <br /> <br /> <br />amounts ofliquid water present in the clouds reported <br />here, adaptive coefficients were not employed. <br />Sources of error in radiometric measurements of <br />liquid and vapor are associated with estimation of the <br />mean radiating temperature of the emitter, the deter- <br />mination of brightness temperature, uncertainties in <br />dry attenuation, and uncertainty in the vapor and water <br />attenuation coefficients (Westwater, 1978). Westwater <br />estimated that with these uncertainties in the absorp- <br />tion calculation, liquid retrieval accuracies better than <br />15% can be achieved for a wide range of liquid water <br />contents. Rain or mixed phase precipitation also may <br />obscure the measurement of cloud liquid. False signals <br />can also be caused by melting hydrometers and/or a <br />water coated reflector. Periods when melting occurred <br />or the reflector was wet were removed from the dataset <br />prior to this analysis. Ice crystals, on the other hand, <br />have no discernible effect on the emissions by water <br />vapor and liquid, whether it be falling or resting on the <br />reflector. <br />During SCPP, the USBR radiometer was located in <br />the high alpine environment of the central Sierra Ne- <br />vada at Kingvale, California, elevation 1857 m (all <br />heights are relative to mean sea level). This radiometer <br />was operated during the winter months of December <br />1984 through March 1985. Rawinsonde observations <br />were taken concurrently during storms at Kingvale. <br />The USBR and NOAA radiometers were collocated <br />in COSE. The elevation of the radiometers was 2050 <br />m. The two radiometer systems operated indepen- <br />dently. However, the mean radiating temperatures and <br />atmospheric attentuation coefficients used to retrieve <br />vapor and liquid were identical. Retrieval coefficients <br />were calculated from a sample of 352 soundings re- <br />leased in previous COSE experiments from Craig, Col- <br />orado. <br /> <br />b. Rawinsondes <br /> <br />Upper air observations were made during the SCPP <br />and COSE. The Sierra Cooperative Pilot Project <br />launches were made at Kingvale, where the radiometer <br />was operated. The Colorado Orographic Seeding Ex- <br />periment launched rawinsondes - 8 km from the col- <br />located radiometers. <br />TheVIZ Acculok rawinsonde was used at both field <br />sites. The VIZ package is used in upper air measure- <br />ments in more than 20 countries, and also by the Na- <br />tional Weather Service. The rawinsondes were factory <br />calibrated by VIZ at a temperature of 300C and 33% <br />relative humidity, which is considered to be within the <br />optimal calibration range. The humidity sensors were <br />the most current sensor at the time. Relative humidity <br />attained from these sensors at saturation was slightly <br />lower than previous models. This is discussed by Shaffer <br />(1982) and Nordahl (1982). Under these baseline con- <br />ditions the relative humidity was expected to be deter- <br />mined within 3 over the range from 50 to 97% relative <br />