My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WMOD00476
CWCB
>
Weather Modification
>
DayForward
>
WMOD00476
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/28/2009 2:40:06 PM
Creation date
4/23/2008 1:57:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Weather Modification
Project Name
Colorado River Basin Pilot Project
Title
Executive Summary of Comprehensive Evaluation
Date
12/1/1976
Weather Modification - Doc Type
Report
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />experimental day following a seeded experimental day was contaminated by <br />nuclei returning from the west, after brea~~p of the blocking flow regime, <br />in 7.6 percent of the three-hour blocks. <br /> <br />5. Seeding appears to have affected a broad area lying up to 160 km <br />from the generator sites. Much of this effect occurred, as expected, down- <br />wind of the target area, with south to west winds. Some of the effect <br />occurred (unexpectedly) well to the west of the target area as a result of <br />seeding under blocking flow conditions. Over the downwind area (e.g., San <br />Luis Valley) any net increases in precipitation were small in absolute value. <br /> <br />6. The overall potential for precipitation enhancement by generators <br />located southwest of the San Juans was assessed at around ten percent, which <br />translates into an overall streamflow enhancement potential of around ~/" <br />percent. This potential was not fully realized in the seeded 24-hour experi- <br />mental days due to the following items: a) the opportunities lost 'with late <br />starts in the fall season, b) suspensions, c) missed forecasts of suitable <br />days, d) no increases in experimental day precipitation when strong blocking <br />flow deflected nucleant from the target area, e) increases in precipitation <br />on unseeded days actually seeded by nucleant from a preceding seeded day <br />with blocking flow, as explained in 4. above, f) losses when cold-top deep <br />but stable, orographic clouds were seeded when winds were strong, and g) <br />possible moderate seeding-produced losses on the upwind slopes when strong <br />convection was seeded. <br /> <br />7. Cases of snowfall days with suitable clouds, but with northerly <br />winds, were not studied as part of this experiment. Seeding with generators <br />located north and west of the target area could increase the potential evaluat- <br />ed in this report. <br /> <br />SUMMARY <br /> <br />Constraints imposed by randomization and by suspension permitted the <br />two primary goals of the project to be achieved with differing degrees of <br />success. Detailed a posteriori analysis demonstrated that wintertime preci- <br />pitation had been increased by seeding under certain cloud conditions and <br />decreased under others, agreeing with the findings of Climax. This confirmed <br /> <br />-19- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.