My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WMOD00476
CWCB
>
Weather Modification
>
DayForward
>
WMOD00476
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/28/2009 2:40:06 PM
Creation date
4/23/2008 1:57:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Weather Modification
Project Name
Colorado River Basin Pilot Project
Title
Executive Summary of Comprehensive Evaluation
Date
12/1/1976
Weather Modification - Doc Type
Report
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />3. OPERATIONAL POTENTIAL <br /> <br />Two seeding strategies were analyzed to obtain the potential precipita- <br />tion increase. Strategy I involves seeding only stable, warm-topped clouds. <br />Strategy II involves seeding them and also stable cold-topped clouds when winds <br />are light enough to permit snowflakes to fall where desired. In each case, the <br />unstable clouds are not treated because seeding might actually decrease pre- <br />cipitation. Table 1 lists the separ~te zones within which data from groups <br />of monitoring stations in each zone have been averaged. Also given are per- <br />centage increases determined from the diagnostic analysis, after stratification <br />of data corrected by regression-type covariate analysis. <br /> <br />Increases of 61 to 120 percent are obtainable from Strategy I for warm, <br />stable clouds alone. Over the entire winter season, seeding only these clouds <br />would produce an overall seasonal increase of 8 to 11 percent. In Strategy II, <br />seeding only light wind, cold-topped, stable clouds along with all warm top <br />clouds produces increases of 67 to 98 percent. However, the addition of this <br />subcategory of stable cold clouds increases the number of suitable clouds so <br />much that the overall seasonal increase would climb to 10.5 to 12.5 percent. <br />The potential assumes that operations are flawlessly carried out, with no sus- <br />pensions or other restrictions. <br /> <br />These figures were translated into average precipitation increase during <br />the snow accumulation season from October 15 to May 15, and put into the <br />hydrologic streamflow model developed as part of this evaluation. The net <br />result is a potential increase in annual runoff of the San Juan River (inflow <br />to Navajo Reservoir) of 150 million m3 (122,000 acre feet) for Strategy I and <br />197 million m3 (l59,OOO acre feet) for Strategy II. In the Rio Grande Basin, <br />on the downwind side of the crest, the potential increase in annual runoff <br />(at Cochiti) is l73 million m3 (140,000 acre feet) for Strategy I and 186 <br />million m3 (151,000 acre feet) for Strategy II. <br /> <br />Thus, Strategy II offers a potential increase in annual runoff of about <br />19% or 383 million ~3 (311,000 acre feet). This additional water could be <br />used to irrigate 75-100,000 acres of new farm land or serve the water needs <br />for a city of over one million people. <br /> <br />-l6- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.