My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WMOD00476
CWCB
>
Weather Modification
>
DayForward
>
WMOD00476
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/28/2009 2:40:06 PM
Creation date
4/23/2008 1:57:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Weather Modification
Project Name
Colorado River Basin Pilot Project
Title
Executive Summary of Comprehensive Evaluation
Date
12/1/1976
Weather Modification - Doc Type
Report
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />predictions applied to treated cases were then used as covariates in the sta- <br />tistical analysis. <br /> <br />Using data from the balloon-borne rawinsondes (shown in Figure 4) in an <br />orographic flow model, the evaluators computed the total condensation as the <br />air mass cooled in its ascent over the barrier. The computation was done <br />separately for cold top and warm top, stable and unstable clouds, and with <br />and without seeding. The unstable category of clouds contained all those in <br />which deep convective activity was indicated from the sounding; whereas, the <br />stable category contained all others, including many with a shallow unstable <br />layer. The bulk condensation amount was then compared with the average pre- <br />cipitation observed over three equal segments of the San Juan range: the <br />western upwind slope, the crest, and the downwind slope. <br /> <br />Figure 5 shows, for the stable category of clouds, the average percent- <br />age of the total condensate falling out over each seglnent when cloud-top <br />temperatures were warmer than -290C (left) and colder than -290C (right). <br />One curve (8) is for seeded clouds, the other (N) for not-seeded. <br /> <br />For the "warm" clouds, sample (S) shows fractions ranging from .090 <br />on the upwind slope to .205 at the crest, and .125 on the downwind slope. <br />These total 42.5% of the total available moisture that was produced over the <br />profile. In the control or natural sample (N), the range was from .050 on <br />the upwind slope to .095 on the crest, and .050 on the lee slope, for a total <br />of 19.5%. The natural efficiency of removal of condensate as snow over the <br />whole barrier was thus under 20 percent, a little over 80% evaporating <br />to the lee, while seeding raised the overall efficiency to about 42 percent, <br />more than double that of the natural case. <br /> <br />For the "cold" clouds, natural precipitation is quite efficient, amount- <br />ing to 86 percent for the barrier as a whole. The seeding sample curve shows <br />the ravages of overseeding. The overall barrier efficiency for the seeded <br />sample is 43 percent. Thus, seeding all cold-top clouds appears to decrease <br />their precipitation by about half. However, as will be discussed below, there <br />is a sub-category of cold top clouds that yield increases in precipitation <br />with seeding. <br /> <br />-11- <br /> <br />.J <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.