Laserfiche WebLink
<br />2305 <br /> <br />DECEMBER 1978 <br /> <br />R. E. CARBONE AND LOREN D. NELSON <br /> <br /> <br />physical) information is output from the model. The <br />authors will present only drop size spectra and param- <br />eters thereof at cloud base, since these results provide a <br />conceptual framework for understanding the aircraft <br />observations of-spectral evolution, The aircraft observa- <br />tions permitted input of measured state parameters, <br />CCN, updraft radii and droplet concentrations. <br /> <br />3. Echo climatology <br /> <br />The period 1 July~15 August 1975 exhibited con- <br />siderable homogeneity with respect to environmental <br />conditions and characteristics of initial echo formation <br />and development. The majority of echoes first appeared <br />at relatively low altitude and warm temperature and <br />exhibited little or no vertical growth. Most echoes may <br />be accurately characterized as single-cell, nonsteady <br />showers with one cycle of updraft, precipitation forma- <br />tion, and fall within a total lifetime of 30-45 min. <br />Cloud bases were warm (:l0-180C) and vertical shear <br />of the horizontal wind was weak ("-'2X 10-3 S-I). <br />Boundary layer winds were typically south-southeast <br />to southwest with cell movement toward the northeast. <br />Cloud droplet spectra sanipled in August 1975 were <br />quite continental in character. <br />Fig. 2a shows the frequency distribution of first <br />echo top temperature. The clear histogram includes <br />all echoes, with 86% warmer than -lOoC and 49% <br />warmer than Ooe. This distribution is highly suggestive <br />of a warm rain precipitation-initiation mechanism. The <br />shaded histogram in Fig. 2a is the so-called" shallow" <br />first echo distribution. It was found that the 5 min <br />scan cycle time was inadequate to observe first echoes <br />in that many echoes were spread over 2-4 km vertical <br />depth upon their initial detection. Clearly, substantial <br />upward and/or downward growth had taken place <br />within the 5 min interval and the echo top might not be <br />indicative of the true precipitation initiation tempera- <br />ture regime. The shallow:rrrst echoes are those which <br />exhibited vertical depth < 1.5 km on detection. This <br />reduced the sample population by roughly a factor of 6 <br />and may have biased the sample. A qualitative review <br />of the selection process revealed no obvious bias by <br />date, time or growth rate, and it was concluded that <br />the shallow echo distribution consisted of those echoes <br />which developed by chance at a height and time <br />favorable to early detection by the radar scan cycle. <br />This distribution has higher frequency in the 0-50C <br />interval with lower frequency at temperatures warmer <br />than 50e. This shift may be due to the fact that 68% <br />of the total sample population did not grow vertically <br />but rather descended in height within 5 min after <br />detection. Thus, it may be inferred that the shallow <br />first echo population was detected prior to echo descent. <br />Given this change in the distribution the result vis-a.-vis <br />dominant precipitation mechanisms remains unchanged <br />in that ice phase may not have been involved in the <br />majority of first echoes during July and August. It <br /> <br /> <br />35 <br /> <br />EARLY ECHO <br />(a) TOP TEMPERATURE ... <br />DISTRIBUTION <br /> <br />30 <br /> <br />>-. <br /><.;, <br />2: 25 <br />LLI <br /> <br />n Total sample <br />(676) <br />Shallow <br />sample <br />( III) <br /> <br />=, <br />01 <br />~120 <br />LL. <br /> <br />~: 15 <br />LLI <br /><.;I <br />a: <br />LLI 10 <br />A.. <br /> <br />5 <br /> <br /> <br />o <br />-40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 <br />TEMPERATURE lOCI <br /> <br />GROWTH TIME (min) <br />3.5 30 2~ ?O I~ 10 ~ 0 <br /> <br />ECHO <br />( b) GROWTH <br />DISTRIBUTIONS <br /> <br />\ - .:'...:' <br /> <br />10 <br /> <br />>- <br />~ 2~5 <br />w <br />~ <br />c <br />~20 <br />lL. <br /> <br />~ 15 <br />w <br />u <br />0::: <br />~ 10 <br /> <br />20 <br />>- <br />u <br />z <br />30 ~ <br />c <br />w <br />40~ <br />~ <br />z <br />50 t3 <br />0::: <br />W <br />a.. <br />. ....... 160 <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />5 <br /> <br />o <br /> <br />o 100 200 300 400 500 <br />GROWTH RATE (m/min) <br /> <br />FIG. 2. Normalized frequency distributions for the July-August <br />1975 period: (a) early echo top temperature for the total sample <br />population (clear) and shallow echoes < 1.5 km in depth (shaded) ; <br />(b) echo growth rate (bottom) and echo growth time (top, <br />inverted). Only 32% of early echoes grew subsequent to detection. <br /> <br />should be noted that "first echo" definition in this <br />study is threshold detectability, which ranges from <br />8 to 22 dBZe over the region of observation. It is <br />possible that improved radar sensitivity could affect <br />the results significantly in that these data could be <br />dominated by a "bright-band" effect which results <br />from melting ice particles. Improved sensitivity would <br />resolve whether ice particles above the aoc level pro- <br />duce stronger signals below due to the increased radio <br />refractive index of liquid water. <br /> <br />