My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WMOD00472
CWCB
>
Weather Modification
>
DayForward
>
WMOD00472
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/28/2009 2:40:03 PM
Creation date
4/23/2008 1:56:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Weather Modification
Title
Estimation of Cloud Liquid Water in Winter Storms on the Mogollon Rim
Date
5/1/1993
Weather Modification - Doc Type
Report
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />MODEL ESTIMATION OF CLW <br /> <br />Model features <br /> <br />A one-dimensional model, known as the SFM (Smith-Feddes model), currently employed in the <br />Winter Icing and Storms Project (conducted in the Colorado front range) for CLW and icing <br />studies, was obtained for application in Arizona. The model could be configured to employ <br />soundings as input. For each 100-m layer of each cloud deck, the model developed estimates of <br />CLW concentration, temperature, and probability of the cloud layer in question being all liquid. <br />Also generated for each cloudy layer was an estimate of the cloud type, volumetric mean drop <br />diameter, and the probability of encountering cloud. <br /> <br />The model was originally developed by Feddes (1974) and Smith (1974) and improved by <br />Rogers et al. (1985). The early Smith and Feddes procedures estimated CLW and some other <br />cloud parameters as a function of cloud type and temperatures. Improvements have led to more <br />accurate estimates of CLW. Others have altered the input/output of the computer code for <br />interactive operation and driving (of the SFM) from the LAPS (Local Analysis and Prediction <br />System) (McGinley, 1989) data base. The LAPS analyses produce estimates of temperature and <br />cloud descriptions on a grid that is updated hourly by objective analyses on data from various <br />sensors including surface mesonet, doppler radar, wind profiler, satellite and rawinsonde. <br />Technical details of the model are given in Haines et al. (1989) and Luers et al (1988). Only a <br />brief summary of the more important model details appears here. <br /> <br />In the configuration. for Arizona, model input/output was altered to enable running files <br />containing a number of soundings. Those files from CVR, INW, and TUS were employed to <br />provide estimates of CLW and other outputs of secondary interest. The latter included <br />estimates of the severity of icing for helicopters and fixed-wing aircraft, as developed by using <br />an ice accretion algorithm. <br /> <br />Given on figure 15 is a listing of the model inputs and outputs. With a sounding as input, the <br />program PROC-SND develops, for each cloud determined, estimates of the type of cloud, base <br />and top elevations, percentage cover, temperature, and pressure, every 100 m, and percent total <br />coverage. The SFM uses the outputs ofPROC-SND to develop various estimates for each cloudy <br />layer. A sample of model output is given on figure 16 for the TUS OOOOZ UTC sounding of 10 <br />February 1987. The CLW content is given in the column entitled "LWC" (liquid water content) <br />in units of glm3. <br /> <br />Of primary interest to this study was the estimated CLW content produced by the model. The <br />SFM generates CLW according to the Rogers et al. (1985) approach in which the adiabatic CLW <br />profile is calculated and then adjustments are made based on estimates of entrainment that <br />depend on cloud type. The adiabatic CLW is calculated for each 10 m of a cloud layer by <br />computing the water condensed in an air parcel that rises 10 m and cools at the saturated <br />adiabatic lapse rate at the bottom of the layer. Entrainment adjustments for cumulus and <br />stratocumulus clouds use a curve developed by Skatskii (Rogers et al., 1985) that depicts the <br />ratio of observed mean condensed Ill,oisture content (CMC) to the adiabatic CMC. A similar <br />curve developed by Warner (1979) is employed in adjustments for stratoform clouds. In the case <br />of cirroform clouds the liquid water is assumed zero and any condensed moisture is ice water. <br /> <br />13 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.