|
<br />500
<br />
<br />highest potential for effect from weather modification
<br />has indicated no clearly adverse effects, emphasis on
<br />hurry-up studies to ward off imagined catastrophes, such
<br />as species extinctions, no longer appears justified. Sec-
<br />ond, assessment of long-term effects of weather modifica-
<br />tion on the environment as a whole is assuming rela-
<br />tively greater importance, and means for such
<br />assessment are under review.
<br />For this assessment, the process approach encounters
<br />severe difficulties. How the fragmentary and mostly
<br />tentative results of impacts on specific environmental
<br />components should be formed into an overview of ef-
<br />fects on the environment as a whole depends on assump-
<br />tions about the strength and direction of intercomponent
<br />effects. Not enough is know about these effects for more
<br />than a speculative exploration. As Cooper (1973, p. 102)
<br />noted,
<br />
<br />. . . ecosystems do not necessarily respond in ways that
<br />would be predicted from a knowledge of the properties
<br />of their individual components. . . . The complexity and
<br />variability, in both space and time, of real ecosystems is
<br />such that it is probably impossible to devise a generally
<br />agreed upon quantitative description against which fu-
<br />ture states of the system can be judged.
<br />
<br />d. Holistic approach
<br />
<br />An alternative approach is the holistic, integrative ex-
<br />amination of the general properties of environments as
<br />a whole after they have developed under the influence
<br />of weather differences similar to those expected to re-
<br />sult from weather modification. The Special Commission
<br />on Weather Modification of the National Science Foun-
<br />dation (1966, p. 20) pointed out that among the avenues
<br />open to improved forecasting of biological effects is
<br />"examination of areas biologically and climatically
<br />analogous to the changed and unchanged situations." .
<br />Howell (1976) has shown that short-term and middle-
<br />term effects (up to 10 years or so) may be analyzed by
<br />observation of environmental system responses to na-
<br />tural trends in the weather elements subject to modifi-
<br />cation, since natural variations over time spans of 2-10
<br />years exceeding those attainable by weather modifi-
<br />cation are frequent. A few such studies have been made,
<br />especially respecting the recovery of vegetation from the
<br />strain of severe drought, but the opportunity appears
<br />great for more systematic and widespread application
<br />of the method.
<br />
<br />e. Comparison ot environmental communities
<br />For longer-term effects, especially those spanning the
<br />natural successional changes leading to a climax vege-
<br />tational community, the preferred approach is by com-
<br />parison of environmental communities that differ
<br />in the properties expected to be affected by weather
<br />modification but that are otherwise as similar as pos-
<br />sible. A well-known example is the vegetational gradient
<br />of the Great Plains. Another example, currently under
<br />study in the Uinta National Forest, is comparison
<br />of vegetation in the interior of a forest stand with
<br />that a few tens of meters inside the stand border, where
<br />snow blown from a nearby meadow accumulates in late-
<br />lying drifts while soil, aspect, temperature, and other
<br />
<br />Vol. 58, No.6, June 1977
<br />
<br />conditions are substantially identical. The same general
<br />approach characterizes the phytosociological studies of
<br />the San Juan Ecology Project (Dix et al., 1973), which
<br />established gradients across many stands under different
<br />conditions of climate, elevation, and aspect, wherein the
<br />principal component of the variations was found to be
<br />strongly related to snow duration. This, in turn, was
<br />found strongly related to slope aspect. By studying
<br />nearly adjacent plant communities under natural condi-
<br />tions that simulate the changes expected from precipita-
<br />tion management, potential impacts may be assessed.
<br />
<br />f. Study ot natuml and acculturated components
<br />Consideration of the wide variety of landscapes that may
<br />be subjected to precipitation management suggests that
<br />they exemplify "wild" and "cultivated" components that
<br />are combined in dramatically varying proportions and
<br />modes. In every wilderness area, there is some degree
<br />of acculturation, game management being an example.
<br />Even in the city, there are some wild pockets. Changes
<br />within the wild compartments are for the most part
<br />genetically controlled. They include the entire repertory
<br />of responsive strategies that have accounted for the
<br />evolution and persistence of species and, by and large,
<br />render the prevailing ecosystems extremely robust, resil-
<br />ient, and durable under a wide range of stresses and
<br />insults, natural and man made.
<br />The acculturated components, on the other hand, are
<br />governed by human actions. These actions are only
<br />partly rational and predictable, and many of them are
<br />responsive to stimuli quite dissociated from the environ-
<br />mental situation. Whether a field is plowed, left fallow,
<br />or planted with one crop or another may be governed
<br />by land-bank politics, foreign markets, or the latest de-
<br />velopments in crossbreeding. In this situation, the major
<br />manipulations of the ecosystem, responsive to a rela-
<br />tively small number of decision-making inputs, cause
<br />changes so drastic that they overwhelm the smaller and
<br />more indirect consequences not only of other decisions
<br />(e.g., which fertilizer or insecticide to use) but also of
<br />all but the strongest environmental variables.
<br />In landscapes having a high level of domesticity, it
<br />becomes more and more certain that the environmental
<br />consequences of precipitation management (which in
<br />wild landscapes follow natural laws at least potentially
<br />knowable) will be less and less subject to natural law
<br />and more and more subject to unpredictable human be-
<br />havior quite unrelated to weather modification.
<br />
<br />g. Summary
<br />As the result of painstaking research, weather modifica-
<br />tion impacts are no longer seen as the horrendous threat
<br />they were depicted to be a decade ago (Sargent, 1967),
<br />and familiarity has not bred contempt. Rather, it might
<br />be said that the environmental problems posed by
<br />weather modification are being brought into perspective
<br />and that that perspective is giving them the appearance
<br />of a familiar landscape, in both the physical and institu-
<br />tional senses. The task now is not that of arming against
<br />a suspected enemy but of understanding a potential
<br />friend.
<br />
|