My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WMOD00467
CWCB
>
Weather Modification
>
DayForward
>
WMOD00467
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/28/2009 2:40:01 PM
Creation date
4/23/2008 1:56:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Weather Modification
Title
Ecological Effects of Silver Iodide and Other Weather Modification Agents: A Review
Date
2/1/1970
Weather Modification - Doc Type
Report
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />92 <br /> <br />COOPER AND JOLLY <br /> <br />microorganisms, a property of substantial com- <br />mercial importance. Minimum effective concen- <br />trations are somewhat hard to come by, since <br />most of the literature deals with the amounts <br />required to kill all bacteria rather than with <br />threshold levels at which effects can first be <br />detected. <br />Many investigators have placed Ag at or near <br />the top of the list among heavy metals in <br />toxicity to fungi, slime molds, and bacteria <br />[Porter, 1946]. Water containing 15 X 10-10 g <br />ml-1 Ag from contact with specially prepared <br />metal has exhibited bacteriocidal activity. Water <br />containing 60 X 10-10 g ml-1 Ag has killed E. <br />coli in 2 to 24 hours, depending on numbers of <br />bacteria [Lawrence and Block, 1968]. Bacter- <br />iocidal activity in this context usually implies <br />death of at least 99.9% of the cells present. <br />It has been suggested that Ag interferes more <br />effectively with metabolism of anaerobic bacteria <br />than with aerobic organisms. Evidence to this <br />effect is not conclusive, but this point could be <br />rather easily established in the laboratory. Selec- <br />tive interference with anaerobic bacteria could <br />have significant ecological consequences where <br />water is deoxygenated by organic pollution, in <br />naturally anaerobic sediments, and in sewage <br />treatment processes. <br /> <br />SUBLETHAL INHIBITION BY SILVER <br /> <br />Very little information is available about <br />sublethal effects of silver or its compounds. <br />There do not seem to be any reported investi- <br />gations of effects of silver concentrations on <br />growth rates of microorganisms or fishes. <br />Nonlethal inhibition is highly probable, how- <br />ever, 51 X 10-10 g ml-1 Ag immobilized Daphnia <br />magna in Lake Erie water at 250 C [McKee <br />and Wolf, 1963]. <br />It has been suggested that silver adversely <br />affects anaerobic processes in sewage treatment, <br />but no concentrations have been cited at which <br />this effect appears. The Office of Pollution <br />Abatement of the Eastman Kodak Company <br />reports (personal communication) that the <br />levels of silver in their effluent are 'so low as <br />to be inconclusive,' and that no definitive tests <br />to determine threshold .levels of toxicity for <br />microorganisms have been conducted. They <br />noted that concentrations in water from which <br />Ag is recovered sometimes reach 100 or even <br />1000 ppm with no noticeable effect on bacterial <br /> <br />decomposition. They stated that no definite <br />conclusions could be drawn about effects of <br />Ag on sewage treatment because of variations <br />in bacterial species and . in the forms of the <br />elements or compounds being tested for toxicity. <br /> <br />^ <br />J <br /> <br />COMPARISONS WITH MERCURY <br /> <br />Public attention is being increasingly drawn <br />to the possible deleterious effects of mercury <br />in the environment [Novick, 1969]. Some bi- <br />ologists have expressed concern that dispersal of <br />other heavy metals like silver may have similar <br />consequences. There appear to be significant <br />differences between silver and mercury, how- <br />ever. <br />Mercury readily forms volatile, relatively <br />stable organo-metallic compounds such as <br />dimethylmercury with soluble derivatives. The <br />analogous silver compound, methylsilver, de- <br />composes at temperatures above -400 C. Those <br />organo-silver compounds or complexes that are <br />stable at ordinary temperatures tend to be <br />nonvolatile, insoluble, and almost inert. Al- <br />though no statements to this effect have been <br />found in the literature, it would appear that <br />the lower solubility of most silver compounds <br />makes reversal of the bacteriostatic effect of <br />silver easier than similar reversal of mercury's <br />effects. <br /> <br />y <br /> <br />ENVIRONMENTAL CONCENTRATION PROCESSES <br /> <br />Much of the silver in precipitation falling on <br />land will be adsorbed on clays and organic <br />colloids as the water percolates through the soil. <br />However, rain and melted snow moving over <br />the surface of the ground as overland flow, or <br />passing quickly through subsurface layers, <br />makes little contact with soil colloids, and most <br />of the silver in this direct runoff will be de- <br />livered to streams or lakes. Silver in precipita- <br />tion falling directly into lakes and streams is <br />immediately introduced into aquatic systems. <br />Biological concentration in terrestrial sys- <br />tems. Because of the low solubility of most <br />silver salts, and because of the tendency for <br />adsorption of silver by soil colloids, most silver <br />in terrestrial systems will presumably be im- <br />mobilized. Silver uptake by plants seems to be <br />essentially passive and is determined by silver <br />concentrations in the immediate environment <br />[Cannon et al., 1968]. No plants have been <br />found that regularly concentrate silver, and <br /> <br />.~ <br /> <br />f- <br />I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.