Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br /> <br />Any layer with a top below a height: of D' above the valley floor is assumed not to <br />participate in the precipitation process. Excluding such layers, the base of the <br />lowest .layer encountered is taken to be the base of the effective cloud layer. If <br />there is a layer above this first layer, a check is made to determine whethl~r the <br />two layers are separated in the vertical by more than a distance D. If they are, <br />the top of the lower layer is taken as the top of the effective cloud layer. If <br />not, the process is continued upward until a layer top is found which has clear air <br />extending for a distance of at least D above it. Both D and D' are set to 500 m in <br />this study. It was determined that the values of D could be changed by a factor of <br />two without noticeably affecting the analysis. Once the effective cloud top is thus <br />determined, it is lifted along a streamline (using the nodal surface concept) to a <br />point over the crest. The temperature is determined assuming a moist adiabatic <br />ascent and ~ermed the lifted cloud top temperature. <br />It should ]Je noted that this method produces an over-abundance of cloud tops <br />in the vicinity of -40C. By convention, it is at this temperature that the report- <br />ing of the relative humidity is discontinued due to instrument unreliability~ For <br />temperatures colder than -4OC, the relative humidity is arbitrarily set to 5% in <br />this study. The dewpoint depression criteria would always return a clear air indi- <br />cation for such humidities. So no matter how high the cloud tops actually 1;..Tere, <br />they could not be recorded with temperatures colder than -40C. The fact that some <br />lifted cloud top temperatures have values colder than -40C is due to the lifting <br />of effective cloud tops near -40C to colder temperatures. This aspect of the <br />method should not hinder the analysis since these cloud top temperatures are at the <br />edge of or out of the region of interest. <br />In computing the average normal wind component in the effective cloud layer, <br />the method is to average the components for the standard levels that lie within <br />the layer. No interpolation is performed in attempts to produce resolution finer <br />than the standard 50 mb intervals. <br />1.2.7.2 Analysis of master files. Three separate 'programs were used to <br />analyze the data stored in the master file. The first produc,ed a plot of precipi- <br />tation rate versus lifted cloud top temperature and corresponding tabulated data. <br />The second produced scatter diagrams of the various parameters against lifted cloud <br />top temperature. The third produced for each parameter its average, standard devia- <br />tion, frequency, relative frequency, maximum and minimum stratified by SC intervals <br />of lifted cloud top temperature. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />1-32 <br />