Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br /> <br />was not possible to relate a sounding with a precipitation episode, especially if it <br />was of short duration. The basic assumption is that the' air mass characteristics <br />depicted by a sounding from a site upwind of a massif will be applicable to the air <br />mass characteristics over the massif at a later time. The Northern Hemisphere series <br />of daily surface and 500 mb charts were used to determine the time lag from the sound- <br />ing station to the massif. Those charts are available only through 1966, at present, <br />and subsequent to this, the NWS daily weather map series were used to determine the <br />time lags. <br />For the twelve major basins, there were thirty-three massifs identified. These <br />consisted of independent mountain ranges and in some cases divisions along a mountain <br />range due to differences in orientation and/or topography. In order to provide the <br />necessary input data to complete the analysis for the first seven priority basins, <br />it was necessary to identify precipitation episodes with associa.ted sounding station <br />and time lags for twenty-five of the thirty-three massifs for the period 1951-01971- <br />1. 2. 5 ~omparison of Precipita!:jo~B-at~~-L<.>r 59_Q_..!!I1b anE_ Cl~l!d T_o2-J_~pera~~res. <br />In the Climax investigations mentioned earlier, the 500 mb temperature was consi- <br />dered representative of cloud top temperature for stratification purposes. Although <br />this may be a reasonable assumption for the winter cases in the Rockies, it is con- <br />sidered to be an over-simplification when looking at the period October through <br />April. In the Twelve Basin Investigation it was considered that a better approxima- <br />tion of cloud temperatures could be made based upon the temperature dewpoint spread <br />as outlined by Elliott et al (1967). <br />Climax 2NW precipitation rate versus cloud top temperature may be seen in Figure <br />1.2-6. In Figure 1.2-7, Climax 2NW precipitation rate versus 500 mb temperature may <br />be seen (note different precipitation rate scale). It may be noted that the peak at <br />-l6C based on 500 mb temperature is shifted to -26C based on cloud top temperature. <br />A recent study of precipitation rates versus 500 mb temperature in the Sierra <br />(Rowland et al., 1973) indicated that although precipitation rates increased w~th <br />warmer 500 mb temperatures, there was not a break in the curve representative of a <br />critical temperature. Figure 1.2-8 shows precipitation rate versus cloud top tempera- <br />ture for Hamilton Branch in the' northern Sierra Lassen massif. Figure 1.2.-9 shows <br />the precipitation rate versus 500 mb temperature for this station. The latter is <br />similar to the curves found in the Sierra study mentioned above. In Figure 1. 2-8 <br />the high rates at temperatures colder than -35C is felt to be a reflection of cases <br />with warm 500 mb temperatures, but with cold cloud tops. On this curve a critical <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />1-24 <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I I <br />