Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br /> <br />The extension of the cloud top P-T curves towards colder cloud top temperatures <br />will be determined by the extent of the data within the sample. The limit of exten- <br />sion on the warm side will generally be considered to be -SC (activation threshold <br />of AgI). <br />The upwind and downwind limits of seeding effects is determined by judgement <br />on the basis of the average topographic profile of the massif, physical and theo- <br />retical considerations, and input data from operational and research programs as <br />applicable. <br />Although SC temperature blocks have been used in the illustration, one degree <br />blocks are used for the historical data. <br />The above approach provides an estimate of increased precipitation based solely <br />upon microphysical effects in orographic cloud and is considered a conservative esti- <br />mate. There is some experimental evidence of additional increases which are believed <br />to be the results of positive dynamic effects of seedling upon cumuliform clouds that <br />are often embedded within the stratiform orographic cloud deck. It is possible to <br />form another estimate that includes this additional seeding effect based upon the <br />fraction of precipitation normally occurring in storms with warm cloud top tempera- <br />tures (temperatures warmer than the critical temperature) and t~he fraction of these <br />cases which could be expected to be unstable. Evidence suggests that increases in <br />these cases are on the order of 100% and for our computations, it has been assumed <br />that the precipitation is doubled in the fraction of cases whic:h are unstable. The <br />estimate of increased precipitation which includes both microphysical and convective <br />effects should therefore be considered as a liberal estimate. <br />1. 2.2 Identification of Massifs. In the Five Basin Study (NAWC 1971), <br />seedabi1ity considerations were oriented toward individual natural cloud seeding <br />units. Such units were mountain massifs, or portions thereof, having a distinct <br />orientation, and physically separated from other such seeding units. Due to the <br />limitations of raingage and rawinsonde data, a breakdown of the twelve basins into <br />seeding units of the limited size of those appearing in the Five Basins Study was <br />not justified. The approach in the Twelve Basin Study identifies the major mountain <br />massifs contributing runoff to each major basin. An individual massif may be related <br />to several study watershed seeding units within a major basin, and also may be re- <br />lated to more than one major basin. Figure 1.2-4 shows the massifs identified for <br />the study and the basic orientation of each massif. Table 1.2-2 lists the massifs <br />for each major basin and the streamgages used in the analysis. <br />1.2.3 Identification of yrecipitation Episodes. In order to make optimum <br />use of the methods available for analyzing seeding potential, it would be desirable <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />11 <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />}-10 <br /> <br />I <br />