My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WMOD00464
CWCB
>
Weather Modification
>
DayForward
>
WMOD00464
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/28/2009 2:39:58 PM
Creation date
4/23/2008 12:04:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Weather Modification
Title
The Management of Weather Resources - Volume II
Prepared For
The Weather Modification Advisory Board
Date
6/30/1978
Weather Modification - Doc Type
Report
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
114
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />B-1 <br /> <br />B. EVALUATIONS OF RECENT PROJECTS <br /> <br />We were asked to do what we could to re~examine and discuss the most important experi- <br />ments involving rainfall enhancement conducted recently. Earlier experiments were discussed <br />in the reports of the National Academy of Sciences and National Research Council (MacDonald <br />et ai, 1965) and (Malone et al, 1973). The material that follows covers those experiments in <br />the list given us for which data was reasonably accessible. <br /> <br />Without the support provided by three experienced meteorological statisticians -- Glenn <br />Brier, Paul Mielke, a.nd Ronald Biondini -- who went over reports and papers in (;onsiderable <br />detail and prepared summaries according to the outline given in Section 46 of the Appendix, we <br />would have been unable to prepare the discussions that follow. <br /> <br />At a late stage, we were asked, again with the aid of Drs. Brier, Mielke. and Biondiini, to <br />also reconsider the Climax II experiment. The results will be found in Section 45 (in the <br />Appendix) . <br /> <br />7. Skeletal descriptions <br /> <br />* Florida area cumulus expl~riment * <br /> <br />This randomized exploratory study , (FACE), conducted over a large area of south central <br />Florida during the p,eriod 1970-1976, involved dynamic seeding of "suitable" clouds during <br />each summer season. Throughout the course of the experiment, seeding entailed the firing of <br />airborne AgI flares (but see 9. Operational Changes and Difficulties). Rainfall estimates were <br />based upon radar rea.dings, in most years adjusted by measures from rain gauges'. The study <br />was designed to be a "double-blind" experiment (but see 8. Dangers of Subjective Influences). <br />Over the course of the study, there were 98 experimental days, 52 seeded and 46 not seeded. <br /> <br />* national hail research exp1eriment * <br /> <br />This study (NHRE) was planned to be conducted over the period 1972.1976.' Blocked <br />randomization was employed, with block size two. The study was carried out during summer <br />seasons in Colorado., Effects of cloud-based seeding within updrafts with AgI flares were <br />assessed from hail-s~lparator and hail-pad records in the target area. NHRE was terminated <br />prematurely, in 1974, since physical measurements colle(;ted prior to that time failed to sUPlPort <br />the hypothesis of hail suppression due to seeding. The study embodied 57 experimental days, <br />27 seeded and 30 unseeded. <br /> <br />* Colorado River Basin pilot project * <br /> <br />This project, randomized by 24-hour days, was designed, among other objectivl~S, to <br />confirm suggested efl'ects from Climax and Wolf Creek experiments, all of which were winter <br />studies conducted in the San Juan Mountains of Colorado. The project was completed during <br />five successive winter seasons -- 1970-71 to 1974-75 -- wIth a total of 306 experimental days. <br /> <br />* Israeli cloud seeding experiment II * <br /> <br />This confirmatory study was based upon findings of Israeli experiment I (1960-1967), that <br />had suggested rainfall increases, due to seeding, of approximately 15 percent in the target area. <br />The study was conducted during win.ter seasons, 1969-1975. Days were selected randomly for <br />seeding or no seeding on a 50-50 basis, prior to each season. In data analysis, a day was (;On- <br />sidered to be "seeded" if it had been (randomly) scheduled for seeding, whether or not seed- <br />ing operations actually were conducted. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.