My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WMOD00462
CWCB
>
Weather Modification
>
DayForward
>
WMOD00462
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/28/2009 2:39:54 PM
Creation date
4/23/2008 12:04:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Weather Modification
Contract/Permit #
87-1999
Title
Development of Empirical Equations of Ice Crystal Growth Microphysics for Modeling Analysis - Final Report
Date
9/1/1988
Weather Modification - Doc Type
Report
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
119
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />6 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />to 2.5 minutes, improved the model's empirical basis. However, the same <br /> <br /> <br />fundamental problems that plagued the calculations of Jayaweera continued <br /> <br />in the model of Miller and Young despite the increased sophistication and <br /> <br /> <br />use of better data. <br /> <br /> <br />Uncertainty existed not only in the application of experimental data but <br /> <br /> <br />in the factors affecting crystal growth. Both models used theoretically derived <br /> <br /> <br />results that had not been properly tested with experimental data for growth <br /> <br /> <br />periods lasting longer than a few minutes. Indeed, Fukuta (1969) has used <br /> <br /> <br />data obtained from his mixing chamber to compare with values obtained <br /> <br /> <br />from the Maxwellian growth equation modified to account for shape, <br /> <br /> <br />ventilation and nearby cloud droplets. His results showed that the equation <br /> <br /> <br />with the corrective factors was not sufficient to account for the behavior of <br /> <br /> <br />the growth process. Fukuta and Walter (1970) have shown that this was due <br /> <br />to a diffusion-kinetic factor. <br /> <br /> <br />Another effect not even considered in the works of both Jayaweera (1971) <br /> <br /> <br />and Miller and Young (1979) is accretion, which increases ice crystal size by <br /> <br /> <br />collecting water droplets and then freezing them onto the crystal surface. <br /> <br /> <br />Accretion has been theoretically studied in detail, but no experiment before <br /> <br /> <br />1980 was able to show under what conditions this mode becomes important. <br /> <br /> <br />Since some rain drops begin coalescence well within 10 minutes after <br /> <br /> <br />nucleation (Rogers,1979), accretion could possibly become important within <br /> <br /> <br />the same period. However, this conjecture could not be supported by <br /> <br /> <br />experiment. Thus, without experimental clarification data critical questions <br /> <br /> <br />about accretion remained unanswered. <br /> <br /> <br />In summary, then, the importance of obtaining accurate experimental <br /> <br />data of ice crystal growth for an indefinate period of time cannot be <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.