Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Development of the initial prototype Algorithm is the subject of sections 10 to 13, <br />although calculations of a and P coefficients is discussed in section 9. <br /> <br />4. Collect high-quality observations of Sand SD during the winter/spring of 1995-96 near <br />Denver, Colorado. In the context of the MOU, snow depth refers to the depth of freshly- <br />fallen snow in the absence of melting, compaction by surface heating or other factors, or <br />redistribution by the wind. These S measurements (5 locations) and SD measurements <br />(1 location) will be used for further Algorithm testing and refinement. This task is <br />discussed in section 3.3. <br /> <br />5. Obtain good-quality observations of Sand SD in a climatological area with WSR-88D <br />coverage other than the Denver area during the winter/spring of 1995-96. This <br />observational program, called. "more limited" (than Denver's program) in the SOW, ended <br />up in the Albany, New York, area. The Albany WFO (Weather Forecast Office) of the <br />NWS (National Weather Service) installed and operated a large volunteer observer <br />network, which is discussed in section 3.2. Availability of the Albany Sand SD <br />measurements has been delayed by quality ~ontrol checking. Observations of S from the <br />Cleveland, Ohio, area, scheduled for November 1, 1996, delivery, have been substituted <br />for Albany observations in this report. <br /> <br />6. Based on the MOU Supplement No.1 of August 1995, install and maintain five Belfort <br />Universal recording precipitation gages from mid-November 1995 through March 1996 <br />between the near and far ranges of the Cleveland WSR-88D. The gages were deployed <br />parallel to the south shore of Lake Erie. The main purpose of this line of gages was to <br />investigate lake effect storms and the ability of the WSR-88D system to detect snow and <br />estimate snowfall accumulation as a function of range. The Cleveland measurement <br />program is discussed in section 3.4. <br /> <br />2. Observations from the 1994.95 Winter <br /> <br />As discussed in more detail in the quarterly reports, only a limited number of NEXRAD <br />systems was equipped with functioning Level II recorders during the 1994-95 winter, and <br />those systems were typically located in the southern half of the continental U.S. A key <br />measurement provided on Level II data tapes is Ze for each l-km by r range bin out to a <br />.230-km range. A range bin is the basic spatial unit for which these data are recorded. <br />Doppler velocities and spectrum width are also provided, but at 0.25-km by 10 resolution. <br /> <br />Denver was the northernmost radar with Level II data during the winter in question (the <br />Boise, Idaho, Level II recorder was not functional). Other radars with operational Level II <br />recorders, located even farther south and at lower elevations than Denver, likely observed <br />frequent bright band returns associated with melting snowflakes. Dry snowfall cases were <br />probably infrequent at those locations and no effort was made to obtain data from them. <br />Instead, it was decided to concentrate on data collection during the 1995-96 winter when <br />many more WSR-88Ds would be equipped with Level II recorders. <br /> <br />The high-resolution (0.0 I-inch) Belfort Universal gage at the Denver (Stapleton Airport) WFO <br />was discontinued with the March 1, 1995, opening of DIA (Denver International Airport). <br />The convention in this nation of using English units for measurement of precipitation and <br />snow depth is followed throughout this report. The DIA ASOS (automated surface <br />observation station) non-heated tipping bucket gage does not provide suitable observations <br /> <br />2 <br />