Laserfiche WebLink
<br />hour of interest, and a simple average accumulation was calculated for the hour. Occasional <br />hours had scans from both clear air and precipitation mode scan strategies, representing <br />about 10- and 6-minute samples, respectively. But weighing each volume scan by the time <br />interval it represents would have little influence on the results because hours rarely had <br />different scan strategies. <br /> <br />Because each precipitation gage chart was read at the end of each hour, the radar snowfall <br />estimates were for the same hours. Future work will investigate whether any significant <br />improvement results from shifting the hourly radar-estimated snowfalls forward to allow time <br />for the snowflakes to fall from the 0.50 beam to the surface. The present results are based <br />on zero time lag between the two observational sets. <br /> <br />Future work will partition storms by types (upslope, lake effect, general synoptic, etc.) and <br />other means. However, the results herein are based on all available data extracted so far <br />with no partitioning. A few minor storms were ignored at both Cleveland and Denver if they <br />were of limited duration (few hours) and if hourly totals did not exceed 0.02 inch. Many <br />other storms provided an abundance of hours with accumulations of 0.02 inch h-l or less in <br />addition to higher accumulations. <br /> <br />Because gage charts were reduced at the "top" of each hour, hourly snowfall accumulations <br />are for 1200 to 1300, 1300 to 1400, etc. UTC on a 24-hour per day basis. Individual radar <br />volume scans were extracted for all the same hours for which gage charts were reduced; that <br />is, from the beginning to the end of any detectable snowfall by any gage during a storm <br />episode. This approach resulted in many hours with zero detectable snowfall by some or all <br />of the gages. However, unless otherwise stated, only hours with detectable snowfall (at least <br />0.005 inch) were used in the analyses to follow. This approach ignores many hours with light <br />radar-estimated accumulations. Such hours may have had virga, snowfall that missed the <br />gage, or snowfall that was too light to be detected by the gage. <br /> <br />In general, WSR-88D antennas never stop except for problems, maintenance, etc. When a <br />volume scan is completed by making the highest tilt scan, the antenna is moved to the lowest <br />elevation tilt and the next volume scan starts at 0.50 tilt. Volume scans do not take exactly <br />5, 6, or 10 minutes as suggested by Federal Meteorological Handbook No. 11 (1991), but <br />slightly shorter times, like, 5.75 or 9.67 minutes, which might vary from scan to scan. Scans <br />were separated by several seconds as the antenna moved from highest to lowest tilt. As a <br />result, most hours had from 9 to 11 volume scans with the precipitation mode scan strategy <br />usually used during snowfall. Ai:, few as 4 volume scans were accepted as adequate for the <br />occasional hours where continuous scanning was interrupted for whatever reason. Four <br />volume scans require about 23 minutes in precipitation mode scanning and about 39 minutes <br />in clear weather mode scanning, which is sometimes used at. the beginning and ending <br />portions of storm periods. But the large majority of hours had continuous radar coverage. <br /> <br />7. Z-S and Ze-S Relationships for Snowfall <br /> <br />7.1 Introduction <br /> <br />The fact that sensitive radars can detect and track precipitation echoes is of major importance <br />to weather forecasting and other weather-related activities such as aircraft operations. But <br />use of well-calibrated radars is also important to provide quantitative precipitation <br />accumulation estimates over large areas. To do so clearly requires that a relationship be <br /> <br />18 <br />